BiochemAg97 said:
Ross Skillman 70 said:
BiochemAg97 said:
Ross Skillman 70 said:
McInnis said:
foulbeast said:
McInnis said:
- Correct, it is illegal to block a serve. The receiving team must be within their rotation - which is a whole topic unto itself and is a little complicated.
The rotation I keep hearing about is confusing. The only players I ever saw near the net were Stowers, Cos-Okpalla and Lendcky. Why do they not rotate to the backcourt? I guess maybe if I saw a game in person instead of TV I might be able to figure it out.
I understand you said it's a little complicated but could you take a shot at a dummies version please?
I just found this site that does a better job that I can: Serve receive rotation rules. Read the "Overlap Rule" section to understand the requirements for position on the court. Then look at the 5-1 section to see what it looks like on the court.
What that site doesn't show is the libero (Underwood/Thomas) and defensive specialist (Applegate) roles, so if you look at rotation 1 under the 5-1, and replace our players for positions it looks like this:
Front row:
RS: Lednicky
M: Cos-Okpalla
OH: Stowers
Back row:
OH: Applegate (back row) or Hellmuth (front row)
M: Underwood/Thomas (back row) or Perkins (front row)
S: Waak
Each time you break serve, the players move one spot clockwise. Most teams start with rotation 1 so the setter is in the back row for the first 3 rotations and we get 3 hitters in the front row.
The position pictures under option 2 is what we would do in rotations 1-3. Neither option is correct for us in rotations 4-6 because we never had Lednicky receive serve. She was always hiding in serve receive behind Applegate, Underwood, and Stowers when her spot was back row.
Not sure this is a "dummies" version...but it should explain the basics of serve-receive positioning. And you did see other players near the net (Hellmuth, Perkins, Waak all played in the front row) - you just remember the others because they were so dominant when they were in the front row.
Thank you, that was helpful but not sure what you mean by Logan "hiding in serve receive".
I watched the replay of the Louisville 5th set and could see what you're talking about on the rotation. But that raised another question. The Aggies were up 10-9 and had the serve. A Lville player was trying to set the ball and Ifeena reached across the net and blocked it. At first our players celebrated but it was called Lville's point.
The announcer said it was blocking the set and Lville got the point. The announcer then said the ball was not at the top of the plane of the net. What does that mean?
sometimes you "HIDE" a player who is a little weaker in serve receive. TYPICALLY what you see when that happens is that the player being HIDDEN is behind the other five, frequently standing on or immediately in front of the end line. You really do not want that person making the initial play. they are on the floor to ATTACK only! they may be forced to do something else, but you leave them on the court because they can launch an effective attack from behind the ten-foot line
Also tend to want to hide your setter because they can't set if they receive.
I did type out a longer answer. Just so you know, I understand what you said, but the setter typically simply ignores serve-receive as she gets to her position. That person "HIDDEN" on the back row (with her feet really close to the baseline) most of the time is not running to a position. The team receiving serve just wants to prevent her from receiving serve! Like the setter, if the serving team can attack her, they can get her out of the play (they hope). The best serving teams try to serve to the players that want to take out of position to make a successful attack. I don't remember which match it was but there was one that we persistently served to the libero - and that left me wondering why in the world any coach would have a libero on the floor who was not able to competently handle serve-receive! If you can answer that one for me, I suspect even Jamie wonders!!!
So "hidden" is a very specific arrangement, not just trying to keep a player away from the serve receive. Gotcha.
Jamie did say something about when 3 players are all stacked up on one side and potentially targeting them with the serve to create difficulty in getting into position.
I too recall the announcers saying they were targeting the libero. It might have been the Pitt game, as I rewatched that one yesterday. I believe the announcers also said something about Pitt having an offensive and defensive libero. I assume that just meant a 2 L that came in as a serving specialist like Tatum did for us. But the phrasing seemed weird, like maybe they were swapping them every half rotation. Might have to watch that one again to see which L we were targeting and when, plus how they were swapping their Ls.
Hidden typically means when a player is taken out of serve receive as to not get picked on. If they are a back row player at the time then mainly the three person receive pattern blocks her from being picked on and takes balls that may come her way.
Stack is usually when all three front row players are put on one side of the court to allow the right front player (usually the outside hitter) to be closest to where they will attack from. It can also allow a player to hide as well someone if needed. If they don't stack then the outside takes the first ball from RF and typically will hit from RS before going over to the outside. Towards the end of the season we stacked a lot more.
Two liberos offense and defensive is when they rotate the two liberos based upon which team is serving. We did not do that but many teams employ this especially in club. Personally not a huge fan but if you have one player who is much better and dogging and reading an offense you will have her as the libero when her team is serving as the first ball coming back is defensive in nature. If the opponent is serving you can put your better passing libero on the floor to try and improve the pass to the setter and get a FBSO (first ball side out) kill.
If you have one that is better at both skills than the other she is likely the primary libero.
I would say adding in other factors that for us Underwood was better then Thomas at most libero things except serving hence the serving specialist libero.
Hellmuth was for the season maybe our "worst" primary passer and I say that because her season pass score wasn't actually that bad at all but we replaced her for three passing rotations with Applegate who was probably our best passer or close to it with Stowers and her being the best two.
Hope this helps with certain things as to the "why" or terminology.
There are many other factors that come into play but this is the basic reasoning
We didn't always "stack" at the beginning of the season in serve receive but it made for a better system IMO to get Lednicky to just get to RS quick and have Stowers hit immediately from the OH