Post vaccination masking

7,258 Views | 53 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by planoaggie123
InternetFan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/about-face-coverings.html

Your Guide to Masks
Updated Aug. 13, 2021
Languages
Print

Wearing a mask over your nose and mouth is required on planes, buses, trains, and other forms of public transportation traveling into, within, or out of the United States and while indoors at U.S. transportation hubs such as airports and stations. Travelers are not required to wear a mask in outdoor areas of a conveyance (like on open deck areas of a ferry or the uncovered top deck of a bus).
The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieKatie2 said:

The Agly Duckling said:

AggieKatie2 said:

Corporate appears to be instituting vaccination requirement to enter office, but also commented about mask being required in public areas.

Looking at hospital and death rate per 100,000 for vaccinated persons (per NYT site)....the numbers now appear to be well below pre-covid flu numbers, so why are we still forcing masking?
If you'/re vaccinated you are well protected against getting severe illness, hospitalization and death. You may still contract the virus and spread it to other people.

You are not telling me anything I don't know. Even with a mask you can still spread it, but if the other party is vaccinated, then the likelihood of hospital/death is SOOOOO freaking low.

In your opinion, what is the goal? Because 0 hospitalization and 0 deaths from Covid, vaccinated or not, will most likely never occur in my lifetime, if ever. You can't save every life, especially when lifestyle choices have such a major impact on severity and survivability.

Everyone's number is different, but for me, I believe the governments original lockdowns did more harm than good to quality of life/economy/etc. So taking that a step further, post-vaccination restrictions of any kind are farcical and sit on the extreme of conservative risk mitigation.
First, if one person gives it to another person - even if both are vaccinated - then they can both still spread it to other people who may or may not be vaccinated.

Further, variants occur the more replications take place. In order to "stop" a virus, we must stop it from replicating.

Wear a mask, 6 ft. minimum, outdoors is better than indoors, day is better than night, frequent hand washing, etc.

It's like this: M-16, 9mm sidearm, kevlar, body armor, mortars, artillery, gunships, fixed and rotary winged air support and medevac, sat intel, night vision, etc., etc. There is no magic one thing that works, these are all mitigative steps.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do you still not realize that both masking and 6 ft separation were pulled out of thin air?
The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

Do you still not realize that both masking and 6 ft separation were pulled out of thin air?
No, I am unaware that masking and 6ft. were pulled out of thin air, especially since masking was done with the Spanish Flu here in the U.S. and in many different countries currently in modern times during cold and flu season. Medical personnel have been wearing masks in certain clinical situations here in the U.S. for decades. Ever seen the TV show "MASH?"

Please explain how "both masking and 6 ft. separation were pulled out of thin air."
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Masks weren't recommended during flu season because all the evidence showed it wasn't effective. Suddenly when it was time to "reopen" masks were the key, based on nothing at all. 6 ft of distance was literally a guess, which has since been shown to be nonsense. But here we are, with people in face diapers standing on six foot spaced stickers and separated by plexiglas. Because it works? No we know it doesn't. But it makes some people feel better.
The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

Masks weren't recommended during flu season because all the evidence showed it wasn't effective. Suddenly when it was time to "reopen" masks were the key, based on nothing at all. 6 ft of distance was literally a guess, which has since been shown to be nonsense. But here we are, with people in face diapers standing on six foot spaced stickers and separated by plexiglas. Because it works? No we know it doesn't. But it makes some people feel better.
I do not know where you're getting your information, but some of it is simply incorrect.

Masks are not* (please see the EDIT below) doctor recommended for the general populous during flu season because 1) it is not currently a part of our culture like it is in some other countries so they know most Americans would just flip them off and they'd lose precious credibility for when something big actually does come along, and 2) the flu's not nearly as deadly as CoViD 19.

(Taiwan, Japan, etc. lose fewer productive work days per year from common cold and flu than we do. Some argue that our immune systems are a little stronger because we make our bodies fight through these maladies more than they do.)

Masking was recommended from very early on, starting in March of 2020, once enough data came in to prove that masking was an effective countermeasure. It was not recommended only when we wanted to "reopen." I don't know from whence you're getting that but it is completely incorrect.

Nothing is 100% effective and different viruses spread in different ways. I was reading yesterday that evidence is pointing to SARS-CoV-2 spreading, yes, through relatively large moisture droplets from our mouths and noses when we expel air through those orifices but also in much smaller moisture droplets that can remain in the air for as much as a few to several hours. The author of the report speculated that perhaps is why N95s and FFPs have been demonstrated to be superior to surgical, fleece, cloth, etc.

One point you made is, as I understand, at least partially if not completely valid. I've read that in many tests 3' has been about as effective as 6', but I cannot remember the other factors and circumstances.

I will be keeping tabs on that. However, can you blame them? They're health professionals that are trying to keep us safe. No, they don't, and they can't, know everything about this virus and the diseases it causes until it's been studied much, much more. If indeed they were wrong about 6ft./2 meters and it should've just been 3 ft./1 meter, do they deserve scorn and ridicule? Should we throw out all the great stuff they've done and will continue to, such as the vaccines?

I appreciate and applaud their efforts, and I agree with you and others in acknowledging that they have not been 100% correct on some things, but they've gotten a lot more right than wrong.

I still don't understand why our media hasn't turned to the obvious comparisons such as:

1) What would've happened had the U.S. done what Taiwan did?

2) What would've happened had Abbot done everything Cuomo did and at the same time (including all the good and bad from Cuomo, except the lewd weirdness and unwanted sexual conduct or advances crap.) It looks pretty easy to track and get damn near exact figures. (Same if Cuomo did everything Abbot did and when he did it.)

EDIT: The very important word "not" was initially absent from this post which totally screwed up my point. I apologize for that.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The CDC didn't recommend masks until April, and the WHO was later.

https://www.wired.com/story/cdc-says-wear-a-face-mask/

What studies were conducted to suggest the change as you just claimed? Surely there was a study done between February and April that made Fauci, the CDC, and Surgeon General all do a 180, right? One that was large and stringent enough to supersede the previous RCT's showing no benefit?
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll be busy later so I can go ahead and answer my own question. As of April of 2021, the CDC said:

"CDC is not aware of any randomized controlled trials that show that masks or double masks or cloth face coverings are effective against COVID-19"

https://clashdaily.com/2021/04/cdc-response-to-foia-request-to-provide-studies-on-the-efficacy-of-masks-is-a-must-read/
The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

I'll be busy later so I can go ahead and answer my own question. As of April of 2021, the CDC said:

"CDC is not aware of any randomized controlled trials that show that masks or double masks or cloth face coverings are effective against COVID-19"

https://clashdaily.com/2021/04/cdc-response-to-foia-request-to-provide-studies-on-the-efficacy-of-masks-is-a-must-read/
Great point about the American CDC. Other countries started masking earlier and were reporting that it helped, such as in Taiwan. They lost 12 people during the first year after their government took immediate action as soon as they realized there was a problem in Wuhan.

Here is a link to one representative article. I've put some quote from it beneath.


Quote:

Taiwan took measures early on, including inspecting plane passengers coming from Wuhan starting Dec. 31, banning Wuhan residents on Jan. 23, suspending tours to China on Jan. 25, and eventually banning all Chinese visitors on Feb. 6.

Recognizing that it had to ensure an adequate supply of medical equipment, including face masks, for health professionals and the public, Taiwan's government stopped exports of surgical face masks on January 24 while requesting local companies to step up production. Daily production is set to reach 10 million soon, divided between the public, medical, and industrial sectors.

The government also took control of face mask distribution from the private sector on Jan. 31, ensuring there would be no hoarding of supplies or exploitative pricing, as has happened in other places such as Hong Kong. Taiwan also implemented a purchasing policy on Feb. 6 in which every Taiwanese can buy a certain amount of adult and children's masks per week from pharmacies and clinics for NT$5 ($0.17) each. And to allow for easier distribution and prevent long lines outside clinics, Taiwanese can now start ordering their masks online and pick them up at a later date.

To ensure coordination, Taiwan set up a unified command center, led by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, which manages resources, holds daily briefings, and is in control of public messaging. The authorities have also moved quickly to track down infected persons and map the cases to show the sources of infection. Educating the public on the risks of the illness and precautions to take through television notices and posters is also a big part of anti-coronavirus efforts.

As a major tech powerhouse, it's no surprise that Taiwan made use of tech tools to fight the outbreak. This includes using big data for analytics and developing platforms to inform people where masks are currently available and where infected people have been. Taiwan's health insurance and immigration agencies integrated local and foreign residents' 14-day travel history with their health insurance card data, allowing hospitals, clinics, and pharmacies to access that information when dealing with patients. People undergoing self-quarantine were called frequently by officials and had their phones tracked to make sure they didn't leave their residence.

It also helps that Taiwan has one of the world's best health systemsthanks to massive reforms in the 1990swhich provides affordable, comprehensive, and convenient services to its entire population, including the elderly and low-income groups. User health data is stored on a centralized system accessible to hospitals and clinics, so doctors can quickly see their patients' history.

While travel bans might seem a little controversial, the main priority for any country must be the safety of its own citizens. Though China criticized countries such as the United States and Australia for imposing travel bans on Chinese, the country locked down an entire province of about 60 million people in late January. This was still not enough to prevent Hubei from being ravaged with more than 67,000 cases and more than 3,000 deaths, and the entire province remains in lockdown.

The measures came too late. By the time Wuhan was locked down on Jan. 23, 5 million people from the city were estimated to have had already dispersed across the country and overseas, leading to the spread of the coronavirus to every single Chinese province and region.

Wuhan's plight shows that a travel ban is only useful when it is enacted early on, not after an outbreak has happened. This is why Taiwan was right to enact one from early February.

The bolding above is mine.

The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I respect that you have Friday night plans, as do I, so I'll post this one last one for the day.

I have two good reasons to mask even though I'm vaxxed with the Pfizer-BioNTech.

1) I have a really good buddy who's a Vietnam vet; an older gentleman with multiple underlying health issues. When we have a friend get-together, none of us wear masks as we're eating and drinking so much that it'd be pointless. He only masks when he has to by law and he refuses to get a vaccine because he thinks the government has put something in the vaccines to make us all easier to control. If I get infected and am asymptomatic, I can give him the virus and he could die. It's just not worth the risk. I do it to protect my buddy because he's choosing not to protect himself with a vaccine.

2) I have to test weekly for my job. We've got people at my place of work who've tested positive. They're not allowed back until they're asymptomatic and they've had two negative tests no fewer than three days apart. Not only do I want to protect my co-workers and their families - some of whom live in multi-generational households with older people who are more at-risk - but I also, selfishly, don't want to miss any days of work.

These are two reasons I'm masking even though I'm vaxxed.

I also respect everyone's right to control their own bodies regarding the vaccines currently available.

I'm not trying to convince anybody to get vaxxed or to mask. I'm explaining the reasons for my choices.

God Bless and good health to all.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You seem like a reasonable person although I disagree about the usefulness of masks
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wearing a mask is a method to both (a) demonstrate concern, and (b) make people feel better.



That's it. It doesn't stop/limit the spread of respiratory viruses. Solemn hopes/statements (even from gov't folks) don't change the massive amount of data on this.
The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex, thank you for posting that! I'd never heard of RSV so I just looked it up.

Here's the first article I looked up.

Ags, I appreciate the adult, wise, respectful manner of this discussion. It seems to me that we are all reasonable, intelligent and informed people. It also seems to me that no one wants anyone else to be hurt, but we've gotten different information from each other.

It reminds me of so many things in our nation recently: We seem unable to agree on a basic set facts.

Quote:

The spike is somewhat logical, even if the timing is unusual. When the pandemic hit, sending people inside and behind masks, respiratory illnesses like RSV circulated at "historically low levels," the CDC said in a report published today. Now that people are easing up on COVID-19 precautions, they are also coming back into contact with pathogens that have existed, but weren't spreading much, throughout the pandemic. RSV infections began to tick upward in April 2021, the CDC says.
In the U.S., RSV case counts are "incredibly high for the summer," Antoon says, "but it's about on par with what we see in the winter." That suggests COVID-19 prevention delayed the normal RSV season. A similar RSV spike happened during Australia and South Africa's summer seasons.
But what's harder to explain, Antoon says, is why RSV is circulating widely while some other respiratory viruses, like influenza, aren't. (Though infection rates for parainfluenza, which causes croup in children, are also rising right now, he notes.)

RSV is quite transmissible, more so than some other viruses. But one reason for the surge may be that children who typically wouldn't be susceptible to RSV are vulnerable this year.

Human immunity builds up over time. You're likely to have the worst reaction to a pathogen the first time you see it. After that, your body knows what it's up against and is better at fighting it off.
Typically, the CDC says, almost all children catch RSV in their first two years of life. But babies who were born during or shortly before the pandemic may not have encountered RSV as they usually would have, meaning they're extra susceptible to it now.
"These viruses don't disappear in the summer; they're just much, much lower in frequency," explains Dr. Richard Malley, a senior physician in pediatrics at Boston Children's Hospital. Coming off a year when few children got RSV during its usual season, infections may spike "at times when they would normally not be present, presumably because a little bit of the immunity in the whole community was not reinforced by exposure," he says.
That's no reason for parents to panic, Antoon says. "All the instructions we give to parents winter after winter apply this summer," he says.


AggieKatie2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RSV sweeps through day cares every year. Usually not that big of a deal, but definitely one of my thoughts about keeping people apart for so long is we will be more susceptible to Illnesses our bodies encountered all the time.
The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One of the things that Alex Azar is reported to've said to President Trump is that wearing whatever type of mask he was using at that moment reduces the risk of transmission by something like 72% when two people were masked and 1 meter distant from each other.

I do not know his source on that.
scd88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The primary reason I took the shot was to ditch the mask. I'm not putting it back on except to fly.

It's bullshlt. Fogs up my glasses.
The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
scd88 said:

The primary reason I took the shot was to ditch the mask. I'm not putting it back on except to fly.

It's bullshlt. Fogs up my glasses.
An appropriate, well-fitting mask should not fog up your glasses. If you've got your breath coming up from your mask, there's likely a problem with your setup.
Bassmaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Agly Duckling said:

scd88 said:

The primary reason I took the shot was to ditch the mask. I'm not putting it back on except to fly.

It's bullshlt. Fogs up my glasses.
An appropriate, well-fitting mask should not fog up your glasses. If you've got your breath coming up from your mask, there's likely a problem with your setup.
There is a problem with nearly everyone's setup. Which is one of the many reasons masks are stupid and don't work.
TheMasterplan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The comparison to doctors wearing masks is ridiculous.

Are masks doing open air surgery in a grocery store or someones house? No.

Masks haven't proven to do anything and those that suggest it should receive ridicule.
planoaggie123
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL they even suggested at a School Board meeting to have "how to wear a mask" seminars.

Sure.

Kindergartners will be 100% compliant after a 30 min webinar..
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.