So if I wanted confirmation I was reading this correctly I would post it to the politics board. I found this extremely surprising even as a vaccine hesitant person. I have generally believed vaccines provided significant protection from severe illness and death, but I am hesitant for 3 reasons (1) lack of long term safety data (I.e can it cause cancer or heart disease), (2) low probability of me dying (I'm 37, less than 15k people my age or younger have died of Covid
In the US), and (3) it doesn't appear the vaccines prevent infection or spread.
All of that said, I don't want to discuss or debate the above, just wanted to caveat this post so you are aware of my own inherent bias to generally seek and find information that confirms my own position.
The UK data in the below link appears to my biased eyes that to say there is minimal reduction in death against delta, particularly in young people (see pages 21-22 and excerpts below):
Unvaccinated cases (by age group)
Under 50: 212,989
Over 50: 6,724
Unvaccinated deaths (% vs cases):
Under 50: 99 (0.0046%)
Over 50: 437 (6.5%)
Vaccinated Cases:
Under 50: 62,403
Over 50: 51,420
Vaccinated deaths (% vs cases):
Under 50: 37 (0.0059%)
Over 50: 1,054 (2.05%)
So in my conclusion, the vaccine was helpful for old people but at best was not helpful for young people. Given the sample size, I don't think you can say there is sampling error here. On plausible explanation would seem to be there is a large difference in the overall health of the unvaccinated vs the vaccinated (I.e.: all the fat people got vaccinated and all the healthy people didn't). I am curious to hear others thoughts on the data in young people. Maybe there is something about this report that I don't understand?
I did also find it interesting that the report clarified that even though the data appeared to show alpha as more severe than delta, a more thorough examination of the data showed otherwise, but I didn't find any similar explanation for this conundrum.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1014926/Technical_Briefing_22_21_09_02.pdf#page=21
In the US), and (3) it doesn't appear the vaccines prevent infection or spread.
All of that said, I don't want to discuss or debate the above, just wanted to caveat this post so you are aware of my own inherent bias to generally seek and find information that confirms my own position.
The UK data in the below link appears to my biased eyes that to say there is minimal reduction in death against delta, particularly in young people (see pages 21-22 and excerpts below):
Unvaccinated cases (by age group)
Under 50: 212,989
Over 50: 6,724
Unvaccinated deaths (% vs cases):
Under 50: 99 (0.0046%)
Over 50: 437 (6.5%)
Vaccinated Cases:
Under 50: 62,403
Over 50: 51,420
Vaccinated deaths (% vs cases):
Under 50: 37 (0.0059%)
Over 50: 1,054 (2.05%)
So in my conclusion, the vaccine was helpful for old people but at best was not helpful for young people. Given the sample size, I don't think you can say there is sampling error here. On plausible explanation would seem to be there is a large difference in the overall health of the unvaccinated vs the vaccinated (I.e.: all the fat people got vaccinated and all the healthy people didn't). I am curious to hear others thoughts on the data in young people. Maybe there is something about this report that I don't understand?
I did also find it interesting that the report clarified that even though the data appeared to show alpha as more severe than delta, a more thorough examination of the data showed otherwise, but I didn't find any similar explanation for this conundrum.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1014926/Technical_Briefing_22_21_09_02.pdf#page=21