Bassmaster said:
Proposition Joe said:
He's a guy that used to shill for third-rate online sportsbooks. He gained an audience by pandering to a specific college football demographic, then found he could gain 100x the audience (and $$$) by pandering to a political demographic. Some of his tweets early in the pandemic were downright embarrassing how wrong they ended up being. As another poster said, he's a guy that doesn't believe half the **** he writes but he knows what gets likes/clicks.
So, basically he was just like everybody else on both sides. Interesting.
I'm not sure how that changes anything? Because "everybody was wrong on both sides", somehow the guy that had a vested financial interest in pushing a narrative shouldn't be called out?
He's an entertainer and he's found a niche where he has made a crap-ton of money. Kudos to him. Hopefully most people can see through the crap though.
This is literally a guy who would contact an online sportsbook, tell them to post low-limit odds up on something ridiculous like "who will be Team X's next hire" - complete with provided names including some ridiculous names that will get the most talk - then go and pen a "news" article on his website announcing that "XYZ Sportsbook just posted odds on the next Arkansas head coach and could it be Obama!?" with a link that when readers clicked it kicked him back money per signup or net loss... He literally made money off of his readers reading what was purported as "news" and then losing their money gambling.
If you like what he has to say, great. If he entertains you, great. There's been far more unsavory characters that have carved out far more larger pieces of the social media money-pie.
But the guy is a shill through and through.