JP_Losman said:
pretty sure a female doctor at the W.H.O.
made this claim back in June and was promptly made to retract her statement.
And this paper fails clarify on what the transmission is for presymptomatic people is.Duncan Idaho said:
She didn't retract it, she clarified it....because of the reason I discussed.
She was sloppy when she addressed the Public and said "asymptomatic spread was rare". While technically correct, it was misunderstood. She should have said "transmission from people which never exhibit symptoms is rare." Because what people heard was "transmission from people who haven't started showing symptoms is rare. So if you aren't coughing or running a temperature feel free to do whatever you want and no need for a mask."
Or... Maybe... And just hear me out here... But every scientist and doctor in the world is conspiring to make this seem worse than it really is in order to promote a communist/socialist world where everyone lives in fear and is dependent solely on the government....Duncan Idaho said:
Probably because there is no realistic way to gather that data.
bigtruckguy3500 said:Or... Maybe... And just hear me out here... But every scientist and doctor in the world is conspiring to make this seem worse than it really is in order to promote a communist/socialist world where everyone lives in fear and is dependent solely on the government....Duncan Idaho said:
Probably because there is no realistic way to gather that data.
Or yeah, could be that the average person expects wizardy when it comes to science and thinks everyone has an agenda when science is still developing and doesn't agree with preconceived notions.
coolerguy12 said:bigtruckguy3500 said:Or... Maybe... And just hear me out here... But every scientist and doctor in the world is conspiring to make this seem worse than it really is in order to promote a communist/socialist world where everyone lives in fear and is dependent solely on the government....Duncan Idaho said:
Probably because there is no realistic way to gather that data.
Or yeah, could be that the average person expects wizardy when it comes to science and thinks everyone has an agenda when science is still developing and doesn't agree with preconceived notions.
How about, and hear me out here, when the science is unsure we try to err on the side of personal freedom instead of quarantining healthy people and losing 30 million jobs. Just a thought for the next time something like this comes along.
Nah, personal freedom are just too "wizardy".coolerguy12 said:bigtruckguy3500 said:Or... Maybe... And just hear me out here... But every scientist and doctor in the world is conspiring to make this seem worse than it really is in order to promote a communist/socialist world where everyone lives in fear and is dependent solely on the government....Duncan Idaho said:
Probably because there is no realistic way to gather that data.
Or yeah, could be that the average person expects wizardy when it comes to science and thinks everyone has an agenda when science is still developing and doesn't agree with preconceived notions.
How about, and hear me out here, when the science is unsure we try to err on the side of personal freedom instead of quarantining healthy people and losing 30 million jobs. Just a thought for the next time something like this comes along.
That is something that someone with an agenda would say.bigtruckguy3500 said:Or... Maybe... And just hear me out here... But every scientist and doctor in the world is conspiring to make this seem worse than it really is in order to promote a communist/socialist world where everyone lives in fear and is dependent solely on the government....Duncan Idaho said:
Probably because there is no realistic way to gather that data.
Or yeah, could be that the average person expects wizardy when it comes to science and thinks everyone has an agenda when science is still developing and doesn't agree with preconceived notions.
