Alta said:
Sorry if I missed it but some other threads are alluding to how long this has been in the US? Out of curiousity have you seen an uptick this winter in things that make you wonder if it's been around awhile?
One reason I ask is in mid February I was in enough pain from coughing, very heavy breathing that I went to an ER (I felt bad enough that this was the first trip to a Dr. I had made in 17 years - which I know is horrible) and tested negative for the flu, strep, etc. I got Codeine cough syrup and a steroid shot and went on my way. I also had pink eye a couple days prior to this all starting which is the first time I ever had pink eye. After about 5 days it was gone and a week lady I felt pretty normal again.
Anyways - I don't want to be one of those folks who thinks I must have had it but I do kind of wonder what that was. That's why I wonder if once this all passes if I could go to a Dr. and see if they could do a test to see if indeed I ever did have it.
The rapid flu test has a significant false negative rate. The longer more accurate test takes at least 4 hours to run on the machine. Most doctor offices do a rapid test while you wait. A hospital lab probably has the equipment to do the longer test, but you can probably figure out what you had by the time it took. Just because you test negative on the rapid flu test doesn't mean you don't have the flu.
Interestingly, I have seen doctors get a negative on a rapid strep test and say they were sending it off for a culture to verify. In my admittedly limited experience, I have not seen a doctor send a flu test off for the longer test to verify a negative result on the rapid flu test. I assume that part of the reason is by the time you send it off to the lab and get the results back a few days later, most people are through the worst of it and getting better already.
Also, there are a lot of things that cause similar flu like symptoms. People need to stop assuming that just because they tested negative for the flu they must have had Corona. The risk with that assumption is people thinking they are immune now they had it and then actually get it.
At some point, researchers are going to need to sample a population for antibodies to determine extend of exposure that was never identified to get a true mortality rate. That work won't need to be widespread. so it is unlikely to include all of us.