flown-the-coop said:
Ignore reports from MS and LA. Texas has not and does not follow the paths those states took. In fact, our good folks at the State of Texas learned mightily from those failures and actually rebuilt, rehabilitated homes post_ike instead of buying Harrahs gaming cards and bass boats.
How can one conclude that giving $3 billion in grants to 31k homeowners to rebuild their flooded homes (that weren't in zones that required flood insurance) was a failure? I will concede that there have been quite a few structures along the MS Gulf Coast that have not been rebuilt, but that's because they were reduced to nothing more than slabs by a 30+ ft storm surge and building codes were revised to the extent that rebuilding was nearly impossible from a cost standpoint. Having grown up on the MS Gulf Coast, I would agree that there are certain areas where structures should not be rebuilt.
Another $2 billion was given to the area to rebuild public infrastructure. Another $1.5 billion was spent on debris removal. Another $2.5 billion was paid out in flood insurance claims. $9.6 billion in FEMA funds goes fast when you have 230,000 damaged or destroyed homes and two federal highways with major bridges are completely destroyed.
I haven't been able to find any numbers on how much federal assistance the casino industry in MS received in funds. And having watched it take over my hometown, I am certainly no fan. But it was the third largest casino market (behind Las Vegas and Atlantic City), generated $1.23 billion in revenue before the storm, and provided 17,000 casino and hospitality jobs (that number is only about 9200 today). It's arguable that the whole reason the area has built back to the extent that it has is because of the gambling/tourism industry.
What's interesting to me is the diversity of funding sources that make up the total of $22 billion in federal aid sent to MS. Only $9.6 billion came from FEMA. The rest came from HUD, USDOJ, USDHHS, USDOL, and direct congressional appropriations to state agencies like k-12 education, the Institutions of Higher Learning, the Corps of Engineers, etc.
LA was a little different, and from what I understand, the state required that anyone who accepted a FEMA grant must live in the property for some set period of time (something like 2 or 3 years, IIRC) or they would have to repay the money. Consequently, lots of homeowners just walked away. You can see many of those abandoned properties when you drive along I-10.