The NCAA Hates Evan Aschenbeck

6,601 Views | 32 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by jbirdag96
BlockerResident
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And I won't be hearing any rational arguments to the contrary.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why would they get back to Travis and not Evan?
SchizoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How can they just not reply?
missinAggieland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Apparently they also have not gotten back to Schott - posted on another thread.
NewEra2023
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They don't want us to win it all. That's why.
Randy Rhodes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good, now we don't need to use him next year
S.A. Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thank you Evan!!! You will be great in the pro's! You gave us many great performances & memories!!!
themissinglink
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Expected, but still hurts.
Bucketrunner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another reason the NCAA needs to go away Be responsive!
Premieraggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Evan, you have given us so many thrills and memories. Godspeed. Yes Aggieland will always be your home.
spud1910
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Best wishes Evan!
DallasAg10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
missinAggieland said:

Apparently they also have not gotten back to Schott - posted on another thread.


I think Schott is a slam dunk. During Evan's interview a few weeks ago I think they mentioned he may need to litigate in order to come back. With no answer from NCAA or someone telling him behind closed doors that it's a no, he's probably cutting bait and moving on.

Real shame. I desperately wanted him and Prager back in rotation.
missinAggieland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I understand the differences, but how the NCAA cannot even get back to those who have clear cases is absolutely ridiculous.

The NCAA continues to show their complete incompetence.
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
missinAggieland said:

I understand the differences, but how the NCAA cannot even get back to those who have clear cases is absolutely ridiculous.

The NCAA continues to show their complete incompetence.


He didn't have a clear case. He played all year and even into the postseason in 2021 which is the year in question
Sean98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMU1990 said:

Why would they get back to Travis and not Evan?
I don't think they've gotten back to Travis either. He just sees the writing on the wall so went into the portal just to be safe.
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bouncy ball fans know NCAA hates A&M. Derrick Roland should still have a year of eligibility left
you moran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Missin was referring to Schott.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We should have had lawyers filing suit the same day they filed their applications. That's how it works these days.
Aggie12B
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks Evan for the last 2 years. You saved a LOT of games for us. We'll miss you. Good Luck in the Cubs organization
Sea Pony 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good Luck Evan. We're going to miss you
Sean98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HoustonAg2106 said:

missinAggieland said:

I understand the differences, but how the NCAA cannot even get back to those who have clear cases is absolutely ridiculous.

The NCAA continues to show their complete incompetence.


He didn't have a clear case. He played all year and even into the postseason in 2021 which is the year in question
Honestly, he (Evan) probably does have a clear case, it's just not the answer we'd like.
missinAggieland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
you moran said:

Missin was referring to Schott.

AggieMD95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you can't enforce amateurism how is it lawful to enforce eligibility based on yrs of enrollment? Is that rule not just arbitrary?
themissinglink
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I posted this on another thread, but some info about the COVID waiver. My understanding is there was enough ambiguity that there was a decent chance the NCAA would fold if you sued, but Evan likely didn't meet the criteria.
Quote:

For those asking about the extra year waiver, here is what I found...link

The year in question is Spring 2021.

Schott's waiver should be a slam dunk because the Ivy league canceled the season.

If we go through the criteria for Aschenbeck, it's more difficult to get there. All of the following have to be "Yes"

1) Institution or conference canceled or suspended season due to COVID-19; - Yes. Blinn had 7 games cancelled/suspended because of COVID Blinn schedule
2) Student Athlete used season - Yes. Evan pitched and used a season of eligibility.
3) Student Athlete did not compete in more than 30% of maximum permissible contests/dates of competition; - Yes. Evan pitched in 9 games. (2021 Blinn stats - Evan was #23 I think) The maximum allowable is 17. This may be cheating because he's a pitcher, but that's how I understand the rule as written.
4) Student Athlete was eligible for competition; - Yes as far as I can tell
5) Student Athlete and team end competition by selection date for NCAA championship and do not compete in postseason competition - No??? Blinn's season ended May 8 in the Region XIV North tournament. Evan threw 8.0 IP 0 R in a game they won. My understanding is this is the JUCO equivalent to a regional. Maybe there is a technicality I'm missing as the table appears to be more directed toward NCAA student athletes.
EMY92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Even if granted, he likely would have signed. However, it would have given him significant leverage in negotiating his deal.
OrangeAlert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aschenbeck was an impressive closer. Although Tennessee got to him in game 3, I think it was because Sclossnagle used him so much in game 1. Fresh, he likely gets out of there with no runs.
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
missinAggieland said:

you moran said:

Missin was referring to Schott.




Oh I thought Schott already received his waiver
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Non-transparent processes are always essentially political and invite corruption.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many applications across how many sports are they dealing with?
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAGBQ76 said:

How many applications across how many sports are they dealing with?
Irrelevant. They have one job. And must be, quoting Olin, accountable.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course they should be held accountable- and they have sucked at their one job for decades. I'm betting they don't have enough folks to handle the number of requests. This has been a problem forever and isn't going to change until the top 30 or so football programs spin off re-organize how things are done from top to bottom- from eligibility, rules violation enforcement, etc.
ArcheryAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
missinAggieland said:

I understand the differences, but how the NCAA cannot even get back to those who have clear cases is absolutely ridiculous.

The NCAA continues to show their complete incompetence.


The log jam Covid created has to eventually clear out. Evan along with many many others got caught up in the Covid disaster and knew well in advance this was there last year.
jbirdag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NCAA

National Coalition Against Aggies
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.