**** Game Thread: Texas A&M vs mizzou ****

32,976 Views | 693 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by htxag09
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bigsoos said:

taylorswift13_ said:

Can't believe we ruined a Clemence 20 point game
maybe start him over Dominguez?
Yes, we need the size. Dominguez and/or Griffen aren't power forwards
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One ironic change from last year to this is without a Zhuric or WT we don't have an iso guy that can get a shot whenever he wants, Agee and maybe Hill is the closest resemblance.

Definitely not advocating against our offense, it requires a team effort though (and not blowing your layups when they are open)
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Oh...

That actually was the designed play.

Concern grows
HotardRat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
linkdude said:

One ironic change from last year to this is without a Zhuric or WT we don't have an iso guy that can get a shot whenever he wants, Agee and maybe Hill is the closest resemblance.

Definitely not advocating against our offense, it requires a team effort though (and not blowing your layups when they are open)

Griffen is WAY more efficient at that than Zhuric.

Phelps played losing basketball.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He had good positioning against a slower defender, he decided to spin around and take a dumb layup
phatty26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't even get a shot up,

As I said earlier we need 4 guys in double figures. Only had 3.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mean, it likely was an option drive/DHO between him and Rylan, Agee just lost too much steam on the spin
HotardRat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMUallen said:



Oh...

That actually was the designed play.

Concern grows

Well what he probably means is that the drive was available to him. It probably was the secondary option.
phatty26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HotardRat said:

linkdude said:

One ironic change from last year to this is without a Zhuric or WT we don't have an iso guy that can get a shot whenever he wants, Agee and maybe Hill is the closest resemblance.

Definitely not advocating against our offense, it requires a team effort though (and not blowing your layups when they are open)

Griffen is WAY more efficient at that than Zhuric.

Phelps played losing basketball.


Zhuric was awful
FlyingAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
taylorswift13_ said:

Although Clemence was a big reason they got in the bonus so early

Plus the refs weren't calling it even. I saw a lot of grabbing players thst didn't het called. Plus the last missed shot shoulda been a foul.
JMHO
[i][b]Time to bring back the Wrecking Crew![/i][/b]
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMUallen said:



Oh...

That actually was the designed play.

Concern grows



He had the step on the drive. The spin let Mizzou kid get back position to defend.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For some reason I wanted Vinson in there, in bound to Griffen or Lane and alley oop it to Vinson to return the favor
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Exactly if attacked with his quick first step he would've breezed on by the big guy and got it in or had a better chance of drawing the foul
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The_Truth said:

Ag1188 said:

johnnyblaze36 said:

DartmouthAg said:

Key play was Griffen jacking up a 3 with a 1-point lead, 10 on shot clock and 35 or so to play.

He was wide open and hot in the first half and is the 2nd highest three point percentage shooter in the entire SEC from three right now. Nothing at all wrong with that shot. Just didn't go in.

What are his numbers from NBA range?


It was a bad shot, plain and simple. They were going 2 for 1 in that situation and should have gotten a much higher percentage attempt than that.

Am I taking crazy pills? The dude was 4/8 from 3 in the game. Ended up 4/9 missing an open look to go up by 2.

A college 3 point shot to take the lead is as high of a percentage shot as any, especially on a team without any true bigs.

And well, we saw what happened when our only "alpha" big tried. My own IQ level has sufficiently dropped this evening from reading this thread.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
taylorswift13_ said:

For some reason I wanted Vinson in there, in bound to Griffen or Lane and alley oop it to Vinson to return the favor
Overplay-backcut layup to Pop would've fed us tonight
phatty26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The five on the floor last 5 minutes is our best group. Still too small but it's what we got roll with. Agee, Griffen, Zach, Jacari, and Hill.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
johnnyblaze36 said:

The_Truth said:

Ag1188 said:

johnnyblaze36 said:

DartmouthAg said:

Key play was Griffen jacking up a 3 with a 1-point lead, 10 on shot clock and 35 or so to play.

He was wide open and hot in the first half and is the 2nd highest three point percentage shooter in the entire SEC from three right now. Nothing at all wrong with that shot. Just didn't go in.

What are his numbers from NBA range?


It was a bad shot, plain and simple. They were going 2 for 1 in that situation and should have gotten a much higher percentage attempt than that.

Am I taking crazy pills? The dude was 4/8 from 3 in the game. Ended up 4/9 missing an open look to go up by 2.

A college 3 point shot to take the lead is as high of a percentage shot as any, especially on a team without any true bigs.

And well, we saw what happened when our only "alpha" big tried. My own IQ level has sufficiently dropped this evening from reading this thread.
clearly it's a bad shot because we missed. We can't trust our own players because of years of bricklaying
Texas A&M
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:



Oh...

That actually was the designed play.

Concern grows

Bucky's a good coach, but that was a horrible decision by him.
The Marksman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have to remember that Bucky is really not working with his guys yet. 85% of the portal being scooped up when he got here means he's had to work with what he was able to get.
HoopsAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No brotha, you didn't even get to a layup.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
johnnyblaze36 said:

The_Truth said:

Ag1188 said:

johnnyblaze36 said:

DartmouthAg said:

Key play was Griffen jacking up a 3 with a 1-point lead, 10 on shot clock and 35 or so to play.

He was wide open and hot in the first half and is the 2nd highest three point percentage shooter in the entire SEC from three right now. Nothing at all wrong with that shot. Just didn't go in.

What are his numbers from NBA range?


It was a bad shot, plain and simple. They were going 2 for 1 in that situation and should have gotten a much higher percentage attempt than that.

Am I taking crazy pills? The dude was 4/8 from 3 in the game. Ended up 4/9 missing an open look to go up by 2.

A college 3 point shot to take the lead is as high of a percentage shot as any, especially on a team without any true bigs.
It was an NBA 3. Not a college one. Altho it was a better effort than his next 3 which he seemed to shoot differently than the others.
TheDecadeSapling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You know it's true lol Texags loves a good firing
The_Truth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
johnnyblaze36 said:

The_Truth said:

Ag1188 said:

johnnyblaze36 said:

DartmouthAg said:

Key play was Griffen jacking up a 3 with a 1-point lead, 10 on shot clock and 35 or so to play.

He was wide open and hot in the first half and is the 2nd highest three point percentage shooter in the entire SEC from three right now. Nothing at all wrong with that shot. Just didn't go in.

What are his numbers from NBA range?


It was a bad shot, plain and simple. They were going 2 for 1 in that situation and should have gotten a much higher percentage attempt than that.

Am I taking crazy pills? The dude was 4/8 from 3 in the game. Ended up 4/9 missing an open look to go up by 2.

A college 3 point shot to take the lead is as high of a percentage shot as any, especially on a team without any true bigs.

And well, we saw what happened when our only "alpha" big tried. My own IQ level has sufficiently dropped this evening from reading this thread.

A drive and kick would have been a much higher percentage shot. His makes weren't on pull ups. Someone drove and passed him the ball, then he shot in rhythm.

And we were up by 1 at that point, not down by 1 to go up 2.
TheDecadeSapling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No, keep Clemence coming off the bench. That second lineup only has Pop as a real scoring threat but if Clemence keeps his confidence up, it would be greatly beneficial on that second group
phatty26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now 4 of our losses have been at the end or OT. Team plays hard but our lack of size and talent is catching up to us in this league.
nothingbutlove
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We were at the game again tonight.

Losses are worse in person, imo.

Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We aren't forcing turnovers anymore.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
we're losing the "quickness vs size" debate, unfortunately
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess which 3 are we talking about.

The one I think was a worse shot was the one taken with 43 seconds left, when we were up 1. Seems both are being argued about
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.