Except he was updating his bracket every day, or every couple of days.
Several people on here predicted this bump coming though. The online bracketologists live too much in the day-to-day. Once the regular season was over and they stepped back and thought big picture for a bit it was obvious that our resume stacked up better against the bubble teams than they thought it did, and we're seeing that happen across the bracket matrix.
I'm not completely convinced that we're not still being underrated. Again, unless this committee just zigs where the others have zagged, they have emphasized rewarding non-conference scheduling time and time again.
Over the last four years, here are teams with a NET between 25 and 55 (just to get the elite teams out of the way) and a non-con NET SOS ranked around 30:
2023:
North Carolina (20-13) - didn't make the field, but was 1-9 in Quad 1 games
Oral Roberts (26-4) - won the summit league autobid, but wouldn't have gotten in because their league is bad, their overall SOS was 202 despite a non-con SOS of 6
2022:
Alabama (19-13) - 6 seed - NET: 30, had two quad 3 losses, Non-con SOS of 7
Michigan State (22-12) - 7 seed - NET: 36, non-con SOS 25
Notre Dame (22-10) - 11 seed - NET: 53, Non-con SOS: 26 (famously got in over us)
(no real point looking at '21 because the data was so screwed up, and there was no tournament in '20)
2019:
Villanova (25-9) - 6 seed - NET: 26, non-con SOS: 32
Maryland (22-10) - 6 seed - NET: 27; non-con SOS: 17
Utah State (28-6) - 8 seed - NET: 29; non-con SOS: 25
VCU (25-7) - 8 seed - NET: 34, NCSOS: 2
St. Mary's (22-11) - won the WCC tournament but would have made it - 11 seed - NET: 32, SOS: 37
Oklahoma (19-13) - 9 seed - NET: 37, NCSOS: 49
Texas (16-16) - Did not make it - Net: 38, NCSOS: 18
Syracuse (20-13) - 8 seed- NET: 42, NCSOS: 17
Washington (26-8) - 9 seed- NET: 45, NCSOS: 13
Creighton (18-14) - did not make it - NET: 53, NCSOS 28 - were 3-10 in Quad 1 games and only had 1 top 30 win
Several people on here predicted this bump coming though. The online bracketologists live too much in the day-to-day. Once the regular season was over and they stepped back and thought big picture for a bit it was obvious that our resume stacked up better against the bubble teams than they thought it did, and we're seeing that happen across the bracket matrix.
I'm not completely convinced that we're not still being underrated. Again, unless this committee just zigs where the others have zagged, they have emphasized rewarding non-conference scheduling time and time again.
Over the last four years, here are teams with a NET between 25 and 55 (just to get the elite teams out of the way) and a non-con NET SOS ranked around 30:
2023:
North Carolina (20-13) - didn't make the field, but was 1-9 in Quad 1 games
Oral Roberts (26-4) - won the summit league autobid, but wouldn't have gotten in because their league is bad, their overall SOS was 202 despite a non-con SOS of 6
2022:
Alabama (19-13) - 6 seed - NET: 30, had two quad 3 losses, Non-con SOS of 7
Michigan State (22-12) - 7 seed - NET: 36, non-con SOS 25
Notre Dame (22-10) - 11 seed - NET: 53, Non-con SOS: 26 (famously got in over us)
(no real point looking at '21 because the data was so screwed up, and there was no tournament in '20)
2019:
Villanova (25-9) - 6 seed - NET: 26, non-con SOS: 32
Maryland (22-10) - 6 seed - NET: 27; non-con SOS: 17
Utah State (28-6) - 8 seed - NET: 29; non-con SOS: 25
VCU (25-7) - 8 seed - NET: 34, NCSOS: 2
St. Mary's (22-11) - won the WCC tournament but would have made it - 11 seed - NET: 32, SOS: 37
Oklahoma (19-13) - 9 seed - NET: 37, NCSOS: 49
Texas (16-16) - Did not make it - Net: 38, NCSOS: 18
Syracuse (20-13) - 8 seed- NET: 42, NCSOS: 17
Washington (26-8) - 9 seed- NET: 45, NCSOS: 13
Creighton (18-14) - did not make it - NET: 53, NCSOS 28 - were 3-10 in Quad 1 games and only had 1 top 30 win
