Houston's defense

1,942 Views | 15 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Pumpkinhead
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interested to see how we handle this tomorrow. We've faced a few different kinds of defenses already, Virginia's pack line really messed us up but I still think a lot of that was tired legs. We took some good shots in that game and just seemed like none of them went down. Memphis really threw us off with their length and willingness to press out on Taylor. Houston is going to ramp the ball pressure up even more. Virginia and Houston are probably the polar extremes of what is still man-to-man defense.

Nobody in the country forces more turnovers than Houston. Opponents turn the ball over 27% of the time against them. Their opponents shoot a lot of threes, but they don't shoot them well and that's likely mostly due to their opponents not getting any good looks from two. Houston is #4 in two-point percentage defense.

But interestingly, we have already faced a team with a similar profile and beat them in a game that neither Boots nor Coleman played in. Iowa State is #2 in turnover percentage, and #2 in two-point percentage defense. (A notable difference, both teams force opponents to shoot a lot of threes, but Houston does a much better job defending those threes. They're also in the top 20 in three-point percentage defense where Iowa State is in the 200s.)

And here's where, if we can win this game, we're probably going to do it. To force all those turnovers, Houston fouls. A LOT. They're close to #300 in free throw rate defensively.

If we can stay in control and not let one turnover turn into three, and continue to attack and not just settle for bad threes (though we do have to shoot them when they're open), I do think there's a path to victory here that isn't all that hard to imagine. This game is a huge opportunity for Wade because I think Houston is going to want to play a style of game that he's good at.
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we need to play a lot more controlled than we did against Memphis.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know if Memphis wore us down or what, but we did a lot of things in that game we don't normally do. Like fouling way too much on defense.

But yeah, we can't waste possessions against Houston. And that's what I mean about letting one turnover become three. We can't have Wade or Manny get mad that they turned it over and then just wildly drive into traffic the next play in some sort of futile effort to make up for it.

We also just need to be smarter around the basket. It's one thing to try and get fouled, but take too many shots that have absolutely no chance. Some of the shots we get blocked might as well be turnovers.
GrayMatter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobinator said:

This game is a huge opportunity for Wade because I think Houston is going to want to play a style of game that he's good at.
absolutely, the helter skelter kind of game is down Wade's alley just like Iowa St.

However....

...they trap a lot and force turnovers that way. They double on the post, they double up high and they pressure guards making entry passes.

Because they double (or at least they doubled a lot against Jackson St), that is also going to leave them prone to not being in position for rebounds. They are equally good at rebounding so we need to make them a one shot team.

If it comes down to free throw shooting, I like our chances in that department. We just have to limit the turnovers and make sure we get to the free throw line.
GrayMatter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Method Man said:

I think we need to play a lot more controlled than we did against Memphis.
Memphis had length that we couldn't overcome especially when they double teamed us. Houston doesnt have that kind of length but they do have beefier guards that are good 1 on 1 defenders.
Expert Analysis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need the refs to call fouls when UH holds wade or bodies him up. Wade needs to be able to penetrate and shoot floaters instead of setting for bad 3 pointers. Boots being back to being boots and being able to get into the lane should help free things up for Wade. If Wade keeps jacking bad 3's MO should get all his minutes.

the screen and roll to henry is our best play, we didn't go to it at all against Memphis.
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Have a feeling it's gonna be a rock fight and hopefully they're calling it tight
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's one thing Memphis got away with that was really annoying. We need fouls to be called fouls. We also need to adjust what we're doing better if they're not calling them, but teams have been getting away with way too much grabbing off the ball and putting their hands on our guards.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
what i think will be interesting is how playing a harder schedule up to this point will prepare us for this game. if you look at houston, yes they have been dominate but they have played a very weak schedule . if we had played their schedule we would also be 10-0. it may account for nothing but we are the first team they will have played that can actually punch back for the most part.
Fanatic15...Drs2B!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excellent discussion. Like Bobinator said...

How we win tomorrow... is going back to how we won in conference play last year: be the first team (by ALOT) to the bonus and double bonus - especially in the second half when Houston is tired and subsequently fouling more. Then we have to make free throws. Like 90%.

If we hit the bonus at the 10-12 minute mark and double bonus at 16-17 minute mark of both halves - or earlier - then I think that portends well for our boys to emerge victorious.

AND...We cannot let them hit 3 point shots at better than 25-30%. A common theme in Aggie losses the last few years has been blistering 3 point shooting by the opponent.

BTHO Houston to hand the Coogs their first loss of the season - and come back home to College Station with a notable Quad 1 win!!!
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Post game team stats that stick out to me:

A & M 3 pt % -34.6 , not terrible but like to see it over 35
A & M ft %_ - 63.7 - Left too much on the table there
UH 3 pt % - 42.6

2 of 3 improve just slightly and you're on the winning side of it

And then there was the reversed goal tend call which was probably the right call imo albeit super
Close
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's almost like good teams shoot a better % from 3 against us than their average.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd like to see the numbers on that. If you sort Torvik's stats just by games against top 50 teams our opponents are shooting 37.3%. Hard to imagine that's much above average.
txag72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

but teams have been getting away with way too much grabbing off the ball and putting their hands on our guards.
Couldn't see that much had changed as far as officiating. Seemed like a Houston home game with all the swatting going on.
GrayMatter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
None of the Houston guards could keep up with Wade. They resorted to grabbing him and hand checking him which was frustrating to witness.
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wade obviously has consistency issues that can be a real problem - which is why having Radford next to him IMO is so key - but when he is 'on' he is as good as anyone who has worn an Aggie uniform. You can count on only a couple of hands the number of former Aggie players who you could see with a scoring burst ceiling to drop 26 points in half a game on an opponent like Houston.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.