The 2006-2007 team was a wonderful team but not unassailable in a GOAT debate.
They went 13-3 in conference losing twice to Tech, were upset the first game of Big 12 tournament and yes they were good enough to be in a Final Four but also almost didn't make it out of the second round escaping an upset by 6-seed Louisville by a razor's edge.
Comparing them to this year's team, I think this year team is a bit deeper but 2006-2007 had a senior All-American PG who was a NBA lottery pick (pick 11). To me that is the one key edge to 2006-2007, cause I'd could easily argue Dennis is every bit as good as Kirk, Radford as impactful as Carter, equally cohesive strong culture teams with great coaching, etc. oh, and down the bench Hefner >>>> Logan Lee.
Now This team does have an elite PG in Wade who will be first team All-SEC, is the best PG in the SEC, and only Miller at Bama has scored more points than Wade in conference games. I hope most Aggie fans are coming to that realization. Wade isn't just good, he's GREAT even with the handful of No! plays each game.
but no Wade not yet an Acie level which few college PGs are though he has been delivering more often Law level performances (Saturday the latest). And he is only a sophomore!
As has been mentioned on this thread, let's see how this post-season goes. Then we will have yet more data to come back and debate this.
The wonderful thing is that there is even any debate going. that this thread even exists. It means this has been a special particularly memorable team like a select few in seasons before.