Buzz. Go get Kenneth Loften Jr

10,819 Views | 70 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by MarcAg
Hop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
bobinator said:

Coleman was "forced" to do it because he's good at it. We don't always have to switch 1-5.


That was my point. He wants somebody quick enough to switch and guard the perimeter when needed.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't we change a significant concept with our switching on defense after the Missouri game at Reed where they abused it over and over to get the offensive mismatch they wanted?
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yet he's recruited Marfo, Aku, Brown, and Henderson. None of which are any good at guarding guards at all. And they all also have the bonus of being absolute non-factors on offense.

I don't think being able to guard on the perimeter is a prerequisite for playing the five for Buzz. It would be nice, but like Marc keeps saying, he would probably be our best player.

Are you actually saying you don't think this guy is a take (if we could even get him)?
MarcAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Henderson does alright on the perimeter. I'm not breaking down the film and I could be proven wrong by s film study but on surface level I think he does pretty good on switching off. And I'm not a Henderson fan.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's okay, certainly compared to the others, but I wouldn't say he's good at it like Coleman.
Hop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
MarcAg said:

I think Henderson does alright on the perimeter. I'm not breaking down the film and I could be proven wrong by s film study but on surface level I think he does pretty good on switching off. And I'm not a Henderson fan.


The staff felt Henderson was their best big defender w/ his length. His lack of offensive skills is what really limited him. But during our run at the end, Buzz substituted in Henderson on every opponent's dead ball under their basket…and pulled him out on any other dead ball when we had the ball.
Hop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
bobinator said:

Yet he's recruited Marfo, Aku, Brown, and Henderson. None of which are any good at guarding guards at all. And they all also have the bonus of being absolute non-factors on offense.

I don't think being able to guard on the perimeter is a prerequisite for playing the five for Buzz. It would be nice, but like Marc keeps saying, he would probably be our best player.

Are you actually saying you don't think this guy is a take (if we could even get him)?


I'm not saying it's a prerequisite, but it's certainly a preference and Buzz has said it many times "positionless basketball." The recruiting coordinator that identified Marfo, Aku, etc. was dismissed a year ago and then the roster was completely restructured.

If this guy wants to come here, I'm sure we'll take him and I'll be happy. I think this discussion is mostly moot because we are assuming we can just pick and choose who we want…and we're battling 7-8 similar teams for each of these guys.

I think Udeze is more realistic and solves a specific need.

And we have yet to hear who if any A&M guys are in the portal, so we don't even know if we have a spot.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hop said:

I'm not saying it's a prerequisite, but it's certainly a preference and Buzz has said it many times "positionless basketball.


The Jay Wright mantra. I like it if we can get the right talent for it
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Buzz can't choose systems that are impossible to implement in a timely fashion and then blame recruiting. The buck stops with him.
Hop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
greg.w.h said:

Buzz can't choose systems that are impossible to implement in a timely fashion and then blame recruiting. The buck stops with him.


Uh, OK…
Complete Idiot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty much the right response to any Greg post
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Complete Idiot said:

Pretty much the right response to any Greg post
Im an incomplete idiot…but I'm trying harder like Avis!!!
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think he's our best big at defending bigs for sure. He's also decent on wings, but I think Coleman is better at defending guards.

You're right in that odds are we aren't going to be able to get this guy anyway, so it doesn't matter.

But, what we're really talking here is recruiting philosophy. In my opinion we aren't so locked into a system that we pass on better players just to get the right "fit."

I think we take the best players we can and then figure out the right system.

Our biggest offensive issue over the last three years is that when our shots aren't falling, we haven't reliably had someone we could run a set play for and go get a decent look. Q got better at that and Radford started to give us that, but Lofton would give you that. He's got elite skills on the block and did well even against good competition.
Hop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
bobinator said:


But, what we're really talking here is recruiting philosophy. In my opinion we aren't so locked into a system that we pass on better players just to get the right "fit."



Buzz's recruiting philosophy is the exact opposite of what you just said. He adjusts a few things in-season once the cards have been dealt and there's nothing he can do about personnel, but in recruiting he routinely ignores recruiting rankings and certain guys with overall great talent but don't fit his philosophy. He'll target three-stars that have some limitations and blemishes on their overall game, but are very good in the things that are important to him both physically and mentally.

greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am taking Buzz at his word on his own comment about recruiting. He said it hasn't been good enough and it's his responsibility to fix it. Most here said it was a throwaway comment. I don't think he does that:
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think his recruiting philosophy is more about the mental aspect, the approach to the game and to life or whatever, than it is physical.

If it's what you're saying, then what is that physical thing he's looking for?

Pure athleticism? He's failed on that several times. Coming into last season he thought the key to the future was building the team around Marcus Williams, a player who, for all his skill, is very obviously not a high level athlete.

Size? We've been undersized since he's been here.

Polished skill? Clearly not, Manny O can barely shoot the ball.

So if he's so specific on physical attributes, what are they?

I think the recruits personalities, for sure. He wants guys that he thinks are going to play with a chip on their shoulder. But since he's been here we've completely overhauled our offense several times and we've played a few different defenses. It's not like he's been a hell-or-high-water x's and o's guy.
Double Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All Buzzes teams are undersized. The guy played Jimmy Butler at the 5. I don't think we need big lumbering centers. But I'd like to get more 6/8 long athletic types.
phorizt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
we're not taking guys with physical limitations and lack skill bc that is our choice or "philosophy". We're doing it because we're missing on the guys who are more talented, more athletic, bigger. That isn't a philosophy. It isn't like there are no good quality human beings who are highly ranked basketball players. That's the kind of stuff people talk about when you've done a poor job recruiting.

We've signed 6 consensus 3 stars since Buzz got here. Not a single quality starter in the group.
We've signed 9 guys who were 4 stars by at least 1 service and ranked in the composite National top 150. 5 of those guys are very solid and/or appear to have a bright future(Q, Manny, Taylor, Diarra, Miller). Interestingly, the 4 guys on that list who appear to be misses are Cash, Robinson, Aku and Brown. All 4 guys reclassified and enrolled a year early. Not sure what that has to do with anything but thought it was kind of odd.

We don't have to go out there and land a bunch of 5 stars or top 50 recruits. but the data going back about 8 classes for Buzz that I've looked at says that the hit rate on guys ranked somewhere around the top 150 is far far higher than it is for recruits outside of that. 7 of his 8 rotation guys on his Sweet 16 team at VT were 4 stars.

he does do a better job finding hidden juco guys than most and obviously he's hit on several studs from juco over the past 15 years.

bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is also a good point. In a hypothetical world where Buzz could get every recruit he wanted, what would that class even look like?
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.si.com/college/tamu/basketball/aggies-kenneth-lofton-louisiana-tech-transfer-portal-commitment-buzz-williams-sec
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

3. Kenneth Lofton Jr. | 6-7 center | junior | Louisiana Tech

This is a big one. Lofton is one of the most productive players in college basketball, a big-bodied double-double machine that dominates the glass on both ends of the floor and finishes on the interior with smart touch. One of those guys that have seemingly been questioned at every single level going back to high school due to his unusually hefty frame, the results are undeniable. He was the Conference USA Freshman of the Year in 2021 before going to play with the gold medal-winning FIBA U19 team last summer, where he was basically the team's third-most productive player behind future top-five picks Chet Holmgren and Jaden Ivey. He returned to Louisiana Tech this year and continued to carve out his position on the court against basically anyone he wanted, averaging 16 points and 10 rebounds, showcasing dramatic improvement as an offensive hub by passing at a high level and creating opportunities for his teammates. He's an unconventional player as a 6-foot-7, 275-pound center, and with that comes downsides. He's a mess in defensive coverages out in space, and he needs to keep working on his conditioning in order to stay on the court. But Lofton should be expected to be one of the most productive players in the country for each of the next three years he has eligibility. I'd expect most schools to reach out. Originally from Port Arthur, Texas, the best stylistic fit within that area would be Houston - about a two-hour drive from Port Arthur - given its emphasis on crashing the offensive glass and playing with physicality.
https://theathletic.com/3211734/2022/04/12/ranking-the-best-available-mens-college-basketball-transfers-and-high-school-recruits-for-2022-23/
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The last recruiting class - all the new guys that he brought in - was by far the best since Buzz has been here. So that was a positive change in direction. It looks like he 'hit' on Coleman, Wade Taylor, Radford, & Obaseki. He 'missed' on Williams and missed on the guard who tore his ACL (no fault of anybody just bad luck). I'd give an incomplete with that red-shirted big and Brown. Cash and Henderson I wouldn't call really 'hits' or 'misses'. They were okay filler bench players for limited minutes roles.
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does this kid even have any interest in us?
MarcAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Method Man said:

Does this kid even have any interest in us?
He will if they show him the food spread at the Slocum nutrition center.
Hop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
Method Man said:

https://www.si.com/college/tamu/basketball/aggies-kenneth-lofton-louisiana-tech-transfer-portal-commitment-buzz-williams-sec


One of those article mill sites that turn tweets into fake news stories.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Williams was pretty good and was improving before he just imploded.
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah. Non-story story
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think he can defend laterally on the perimeter like Coleman can without dropping 40
+ lbs. just one guys opinion .
GrayMatter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh i'm pretty sure Buzz would tell him exactly what he'll need to do in order to be a part of this team.

It will be up to Lofton to see if he wants to commit to the style that we play.
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lyle Wolf "liked" this tweet, FWIW.
MarcAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would guess that's nothing more than a; "Hey buddy, don't forget about us over here" like.
mikesyracuse1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
halfastros81 said:

I don't think he can defend laterally on the perimeter like Coleman can without dropping 40
+ lbs. just one guys opinion .


He's surprisingly athletic for his size. I have watched him several times the last two seasons.

Mikesyracuse1
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I give us a .01% chance of signing him
DukeMu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
skaggsjw said:

Buzz has clearly shown a willingness to change what he is doing to fit the scheme. He'll even do it mid-year if he needs to. I'm done worrying about scheme. Yes, he prefers guys that can switch 1 through 5 but I bet he'll take really good players that don't necessarily fit that scheme, if they are the right kind of guy.
Loften looks like he needs an inhaler if he switched on ball screens too often.
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.