Who do we get?

6,468 Views | 63 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Lavar Ball
CovertChad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hearing a lot of can Kennedy but who would we go get? I thought it was kind of understood that this would be a rebuilding year. A guy at work suggested biting the bullet and running over to Ranger Juco and grabbing BCG again.....Thoughts????
Sponsor Message: Nobody beats a Covert deal. Not now, not ever!
www.coverthutto.com
JaySugar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are at least 25 coaches (that we could get) that are better than Kennedy
Ags #1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rebuilding year in year 8 of his tenure? Making the Dance 2 out of 8 years?
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Take the USAToday listing of coaches by pay. Print out a card for each one of the top 30 and put on a wall (exclude BK).

Throw a dart. Anyone you hit would be significantly better than BK.
CovertChad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really like Chris Beard at Tech but I dont know if he would leave there for A&M.
Sponsor Message: Nobody beats a Covert deal. Not now, not ever!
www.coverthutto.com
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No one likes the way the year has gone and I am not opining on anything except the concept of having a rebuilding year in year 8. Yes, you could definitely have a rebuilding year in pretty much any sport in year 8 or year 15 or year 20. It depends on the makeup of your roster from year to year and recruiting. Basketball is especially prone to the team lifecycle because elite players rarely want to stay on the bench so you don't always have an elite player on the roster replacing a guy who just left.
rangerdanger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CovertChad said:

Hearing a lot of can Kennedy but who would we go get? I thought it was kind of understood that this would be a rebuilding year. A guy at work suggested biting the bullet and running over to Ranger Juco and grabbing BCG again.....Thoughts????


Your coworker has a great basketball mind.
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CovertChad said:

I really like Chris Beard at Tech but I dont know if he would leave there for A&M.
let me save you the trouble of wondering....theres no effing way in hell he is leaving tech to come here. just like there is no way we can lure their baseball coach here either. going off on a tangent here but the best chance we have of hring a top notch coach in a non-revenue sport is pulling vic schaefer from MSU, and i even doubt we care enough to do so.
Jbob88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If we don't hire Eric Musselman of #10 Nevada (17-1), then we deserve to suck for another decade.
Tabasco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

No one likes the way the year has gone and I am not opining on anything except the concept of having a rebuilding year in year 8. Yes, you could definitely have a rebuilding year in pretty much any sport in year 8 or year 15 or year 20. It depends on the makeup of your roster from year to year and recruiting. Basketball is especially prone to the team lifecycle because elite players rarely want to stay on the bench so you don't always have an elite player on the roster replacing a guy who just left.
Billy Kennedy just doxxed himself.
Ags #1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hahahahaha
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

No one likes the way the year has gone and I am not opining on anything except the concept of having a rebuilding year in year 8. Yes, you could definitely have a rebuilding year in pretty much any sport in year 8 or year 15 or year 20. It depends on the makeup of your roster from year to year and recruiting. Basketball is especially prone to the team lifecycle because elite players rarely want to stay on the bench so you don't always have an elite player on the roster replacing a guy who just left.
For example, West Virginia is 8-9 this season. Doesn't mean that Huggins is a crap coach all of a sudden.

At the end of the day, Woodward will have to evaluate the status of the program going forward, balance against the cost/benefit of making a change, and make a decision.
Aston04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JaySugar said:

There are at least 25 coaches (that we could get) that are better than Kennedy
Haha. Way to go out on a limb.

It's an absurd how poor of a sideline coach we have had for 8 years now. Only reason he is still here is world's of talent to keep him afloat. Now we are back to average amount of talent and the results follow.
Method Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JaySugar said:

There are at least 25 coaches (that we could get) that are better than Kennedy
Prob 50 to 100.
Aston04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Huggins

He has skins on the wall to afford an off year. Off year for BK is the norm (6 of 8 no tourney... around 45% conference winning percentage counting conference tournament & regular season... Only 4 appearances in tourney in over 20 years... overall winning percentage just over 60 percent... NOT acceptable)

.... Good years are the outlier. That is unacceptable. Nevermind, BK is very likely never again going to have that crazy talent bubble he had to even reach those outlier seasons either.
Double Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comparing Bob Huggins off year to Billy Kennedy's.
jeffdjohnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It isn't going to happen this year. It will likely be a no-name coach at a mid-major (probably not on the radar at the moment) and will likely happen at the end of next season.

A&M won't spend the money to attract a top coach. And a top, up and coming coach will likely have better prospects than A&M.
GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

No one likes the way the year has gone and I am not opining on anything except the concept of having a rebuilding year in year 8. Yes, you could definitely have a rebuilding year in pretty much any sport in year 8 or year 15 or year 20. It depends on the makeup of your roster from year to year and recruiting. Basketball is especially prone to the team lifecycle because elite players rarely want to stay on the bench so you don't always have an elite player on the roster replacing a guy who just left.
100% accurate. If you aren't one of the top 5-6 teams in terms of recruiting it will happen inevitably.

The problem in our case is 1) whether the building part of rebuilding is occurring and 2) having two rebuilding seasons in four years shows a lack of consistency in roster management. The lack of multiple highly talented post players on the way in indicates to me that the building that is occurring is insufficient and the fact that transfers make up such a high proportion of the team that it's possible to lose 80-100% of starters in 2 out of four years indicates problems in recruiting high school players consistently.

Love our pipeline of guards as Harris and Wheeler are both going to be very competent SEC guards, but the lack of forwards and centers in the pipeline is a huge concern and combined with the likely result of this season are sufficient justification to make a coaching change after the season.
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If it were up to me - consider Nate Oats:

Quote:

In conversations, Oats appears to be a very regular human. He's easygoing and seemingly low-maintenance. He happily shares details of a weight-loss competition with his staff and shows off the gift cards at stake, and he accepts life hacks such as how to use a pizza cutter for his kids' pancakes. Some Midwest austerity shines through when Oats admits to chiding players who don't finish what they take at team meals; he tells them they must have grown up rich, because he couldn't leave food on the plate as a kid. Any assumptions you make based on this information is at your own risk, though. After a few days at Alumni Arena, it's evident this is no guileless proprietor of a corner-store operation. There is bombast here. There is an urgency to beat everyone at everything, badly, and a healthy presumption about the ability to do so.

It's crystallized once you draw in close. Only then do you notice the serrated edges. "You'll see Nick Saban go crazy when (Alabama is) up three touchdowns in the fourth quarter," Oats says. "Well, that's what's starting to irritate me. We're up 28, for instance, at St. Bonaventure. We're supposed to win that game by 35 to 40. Well, we don't. We won it by 18 because we don't keep our foot on the gas pedal."

There are, as Oats calls them, various "non-negotiables" in how his players must perform on the floor. Some fall under the general umbrella of effort, of a workmanlike approach to the game; this is why the assistants wear mechanics' shirts while they warm up the team before a game, and why one player is rewarded with a blue hard hat for accruing the most points for tips, floor dives, etc., in any contest. Some are more specific, such as squaring up an opponent in a defensive stance and being in constant communication with teammates on the floor, or heeding attention to detail, lest you be penalized one way or another for a lack of concentration.
Quote:

It's an idea Oats tries to embed in the players after practice, emphasizing the urgency to seize the opportunity to go up two games on the MAC contenders with a win the next night. He returns to the theme at shootaround the next afternoon, asking for an overwhelming intensity from the start. In general, he feels his group isn't exerting itself for the full 40 minutes. Not consistently enough, anyway. He anticipates taking Toledo's best shot, too, so his guard is up. As a rule, he wants Buffalo to play as if it has accomplished everything and nothing at all.

"It's a much better spot to be in when everyone's chasing you all year," Oats tells his team. "You have 100 percent control of your destiny. We need to come out and punch these guys in the mouth and control our own destiny."

https://theathletic.com/762393/2019/01/16/nate-oats-future-is-tbd-but-the-buffalo-coachs-present-is-pretty-great/
AggieHoopsGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Make the Texas A&m job the last stop of Buzz Williams' career. He is from Texas, got his start coaching in Texas and was an assistant at A&M under Billy Gillispie. Pay the man and give him what he needs to hire quality assistants.
expresswrittenconsent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Double Diamond said:

Comparing Bob Huggins off year to Billy Kennedy's.

It's hilarious. Good coaches can and will have bad years. Bad coaches can and will have good years. Billy Kennedy is a bad coach. His 2/8 (ncaa trips) here and 3/20 for his career say so. All of the excuses made for him say so. His sub 0.500 conf record after 8 yrs says so.
No expertise is needed to correctly judge Billy Kennedys (or Bob Huggins) coaching ability.
AggieDad74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sampson won't come, Beard ain't coming, and neither is Musselman, Huggins, or Buzz! Nobody wants to reign over a rebuilding project!

BCG would be your best bet with a long term contract! Provided, of course, that you pay off BK's existing contract, and hefty buyout clause!

But all of this is going to be up to Woodward, who seems lukewarm, at best, to change! After all, football is Woodward's preeminent cash cow!
TopoTacos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Probably lost our shot at Musselman, he's gotten to be rather high profile now with the seasons they have put together at Nevada lately.

Buzz might be an option if he felt a call back to the A&am system/ didn't want to deal with the giants in the ACC every year. He's making around $2.6m every year so we could likely make a credible offer.

If we wanted a bigger name we could probably entice Steve Alford and give him as much control as he wanted (Aggie Hoops boosters are much less involved than those in Westwood).

Best bet would probably be grabbing a quality guy at a lower level that could put his stamp on the culture. Nate Oats at Buffalo seems to approach the game with a similar vibe to what Jimbo brought to the Football team, while Porter Moser at Loyola-Chicago has been a multi-time A&M assistant coach (if we needed someone with maroon ties).

GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
expresswrittenconsent said:

Double Diamond said:

Comparing Bob Huggins off year to Billy Kennedy's.
It's hilarious. Good coaches can and will have bad years. Bad coaches can and will have good years. Billy Kennedy is a bad coach. His 2/8 (ncaa trips) here and 3/20 for his career say so. All of the excuses made for him say so. His sub 0.500 conf record after 8 yrs says so.
No expertise is needed to correctly judge Billy Kennedys (or Bob Huggins) coaching ability.
At a school on the level of Centenary and Southeastern Louisiana, is success defined by NCAA tournament appearances?

What about a school like Murray State? When you have to win the conference tournament to make it to the NCAA tournament, can you call a season successful in which you won the regular season but got upset in the tournament?

Your 2/8 statistic and commentary on what he has done here is 100% valid and is the primary reason he shouldn't be retained after the season. It just doesn't seem like the results support that he was a "bad coach" in the context of those three previous schools. His teams won four conference championships in the 13 years before he got here, he took SE LA to their only NCAA tournament ever, and his 2010 Murray State team had the first OVC NCAAT victory since 1989.

Was he the best candidate available at the time he was hired? No.
Did his previous results indicate he was a bad coach? Also no.

Edit: i didn't choose the crying icon intentionally but it may be fitting given what happened last night.
EXCELL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
THE FRANKENSTEIN THREE !!!


Bring back Tony Barone to be the Xs and Os guy (don't let him talk about anything that isn't drawn up on a white board)
Bring back Melvin Watkins to be the well-dressed, likeable front man (don't let him actually get involved in practice or the games)
Bring back BCG to be the head coach, motivator, hustle instituter, disciplinarian (don't let him talk directly to athletic department staff or alumni).

Plus the 2 handlers mentioned below

VOILA !!!

Success
EXCELL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Handler (and I don't mean that psycho Chelsea)

BCG might work if and ONLY if, he agreed to a handler that would handle interface with the staff and a "social graces coach/mentor/handler" that would help him with alumni and media.
GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would love to see us hire BCG as associate head coach like Stans was as a midseason hire and then keep him in that position regardless of what happens with BK. If there are concerns about his ability to handle the other aspects of being a head coach then have a head coach but pay BCG like a head coach kind of like LSU does with Aranda.
AgsNguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JaySugar said:

There are at least 25 coaches (that we could get) that are better than Kennedy


I think you could make a run at putting together a list of 25 coaches NAMED billy that we could get and are better then BK.
mhayden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GE said:

expresswrittenconsent said:

Double Diamond said:

Comparing Bob Huggins off year to Billy Kennedy's.
It's hilarious. Good coaches can and will have bad years. Bad coaches can and will have good years. Billy Kennedy is a bad coach. His 2/8 (ncaa trips) here and 3/20 for his career say so. All of the excuses made for him say so. His sub 0.500 conf record after 8 yrs says so.
No expertise is needed to correctly judge Billy Kennedys (or Bob Huggins) coaching ability.
At a school on the level of Centenary and Southeastern Louisiana, is success defined by NCAA tournament appearances?

What about a school like Murray State? When you have to win the conference tournament to make it to the NCAA tournament, can you call a season successful in which you won the regular season but got upset in the tournament?

Your 2/8 statistic and commentary on what he has done here is 100% valid and is the primary reason he shouldn't be retained after the season. It just doesn't seem like the results support that he was a "bad coach" in the context of those three previous schools. His teams won four conference championships in the 13 years before he got here, he took SE LA to their only NCAA tournament ever, and his 2010 Murray State team had the first OVC NCAAT victory since 1989.

Was he the best candidate available at the time he was hired? No.
Did his previous results indicate he was a bad coach? Also no.

Edit: i didn't choose the crying icon intentionally but it may be fitting given what happened last night.

If you can't decide whether to judge based on records or tournament appearances at the mid-major schools, it helps simply to look at what other coaches have done at that school. A couple of coaches won at 70%+ clip. Almost all (including Kennedy) won at a 60%+ clip.

Here are the last 8 Murray State head coaches dating back to 1985:


Matt McMahon (1 tournament in 3 years, currently 13-2)
Steve Prohm (1 tournament in 4 years... and working on his 3rd in 4 years at his new major conference school)
Billy Kennedy (1 tournament in 5 years)
Mick Cronin (2 tournaments in 3 years)
Tevester Anderson (2 tournaments in 5 years)
Mark Gottfried (2 tournaments in 3 years)
Scott Edgar (2 tournament in 4 years)
Steve Newton (4 tournaments in 7 years)


So dating back to 1985 all the coaches won at least 60% of their games... But only one coach made the NCAA Tournament less than 25% of the time.

Billy Kennedy was arguably one of the worst coaches at Murray State since 1985.
EXCELL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GE said:

I would love to see us hire BCG as associate head coach like Stans was as a midseason hire and then keep him in that position regardless of what happens with BK. If there are concerns about his ability to handle the other aspects of being a head coach then have a head coach but pay BCG like a head coach kind of like LSU does with Aranda.
BCG isn't going anywhere as an assistant or head coach in-waiting.
His ego won't allow it.
He has clearly stated that he like being his own boss as AD and head coach.
EXCELL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Billy Kennedy was arguably one of the worst coaches at Murray State since 1985.
The ONLY reason BK was ever hired was because Turgeon dropped us in the grease with his late and sudden departure. Byrne was in between a rock and a hard place. His options were very limited at that point.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
*325 coaches
EXCELL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm still going with Frankenstein.
Clear winner.
GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
free_mhayden said:

GE said:

expresswrittenconsent said:

Double Diamond said:

Comparing Bob Huggins off year to Billy Kennedy's.
It's hilarious. Good coaches can and will have bad years. Bad coaches can and will have good years. Billy Kennedy is a bad coach. His 2/8 (ncaa trips) here and 3/20 for his career say so. All of the excuses made for him say so. His sub 0.500 conf record after 8 yrs says so.
No expertise is needed to correctly judge Billy Kennedys (or Bob Huggins) coaching ability.
At a school on the level of Centenary and Southeastern Louisiana, is success defined by NCAA tournament appearances?

What about a school like Murray State? When you have to win the conference tournament to make it to the NCAA tournament, can you call a season successful in which you won the regular season but got upset in the tournament?

Your 2/8 statistic and commentary on what he has done here is 100% valid and is the primary reason he shouldn't be retained after the season. It just doesn't seem like the results support that he was a "bad coach" in the context of those three previous schools. His teams won four conference championships in the 13 years before he got here, he took SE LA to their only NCAA tournament ever, and his 2010 Murray State team had the first OVC NCAAT victory since 1989.

Was he the best candidate available at the time he was hired? No.
Did his previous results indicate he was a bad coach? Also no.

Edit: i didn't choose the crying icon intentionally but it may be fitting given what happened last night.

If you can't decide whether to judge based on records or tournament appearances at the mid-major schools, it helps simply to look at what other coaches have done at that school. A couple of coaches won at 70%+ clip. Almost all (including Kennedy) won at a 60%+ clip.

Here are the last 8 Murray State head coaches dating back to 1985:


Matt McMahon (1 tournament in 3 years, currently 13-2)
Steve Prohm (1 tournament in 4 years... and working on his 3rd in 4 years at his new major conference school)
Billy Kennedy (1 tournament in 5 years)
Mick Cronin (2 tournaments in 3 years)
Tevester Anderson (2 tournaments in 5 years)
Mark Gottfried (2 tournaments in 3 years)
Scott Edgar (2 tournament in 4 years)
Steve Newton (4 tournaments in 7 years)


So dating back to 1985 all the coaches won at least 60% of their games... But only one coach made the NCAA Tournament less than 25% of the time.

Billy Kennedy was arguably one of the worst coaches at Murray State since 1985.
Another way of saying what you're saying is Billy Kennedy's teams failed to win the conference tournament 4 out of 5 years.

We can get into specifics if you would like but here is the link to the wikipedia page on Murray State.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_State_Racers_men%27s_basketball

  • You'll see that starting with Newton turning it around they finished first or second in conference every year except for 1
  • until Anderson who finished 1st, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, winning the conference tourney twice.
  • Cronin then took over and went 2nd, 2nd, 1st and then left, winning conference tourney twice.
  • Kennedy took over Cronin's team which returned just 1 of its top 6 and 2 of its top 8 players and finished 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 1st, 1st, winning the conference tournament once.
  • Prohm took over Kennedy's team which returned 3 of its top 6 and 5 of its top 8 players and finished 1st, 1st, 1st, and 1st with one conference tournament win.

EXCELL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many of those coaches have gigs at major programs (the good, the bad and the ugly) ???

Prohm is at Iowa State.
Cronin is at Cincinatti

Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.