Just curious, straight up trade for the two would you do it?

It would be nice to have Abrams offense, and esp. his 3 point shot, but his defense would be such a down grade. I don't know how well Abrams does in our offense with no one like Augustine to set him up all the time.

I think Kirk fits our team, and style of play very well. With our team make up I would rather have a lock down defender, then a defensive liability who can score. Plus abrams wears that stupid sock on his arm.

foooooook no!

nope...give me kirk everytime

Abrams has the sock on his arm and the snuffaluffugus eyelashes. He did graduate from my alma mater but no I'd take Kirk based on eyelashes alone.

[This message has been edited by InTheZoneAg (edited 2/14/2008 9:24a).]

^
|
|
|

I agree with what he said.

Except the part about the alma mater. I have no clue where he went to HS.

[This message has been edited by AgAlum1998 (edited 2/14/2008 9:27a).]

nm

[This message has been edited by SuperDave03 (edited 2/14/2008 11:05a).]

Absolutely not... let's compare...

Kirk:
90 assists
46% FG %
47% 3PT%

Abrams
36 assists
45% FG %
38% 3PT%

plus intangibles are on Dominique's side starting his entire career... plus he doesn't wear that damn sock

I'd take Kirk on my team any day!

Thanks D-Kirk for everything you have done for us!

[This message has been edited by Wendy 1990 (edited 2/14/2008 9:34a).]

no way in hell!

Kirk actually plays defense, so no I would not take that trade.

I almost numchucked you, you don't even realize!

Defense wins championships. Kirk

No. Abrams is a great, great shooter, but that's all he brings to the table. Kirk brings defense, leadership and playmaking at clutch times.

no way in hell

No way, as mentioned above, Abrams is extremely inconsistent and does not play the same defense nor bring any of the same intangibles to floor. Furthermore, without Augustin's ability to create and dish, Abrams would not have the same success.

Kirk is a great asset to this team and a class act. Plus he can guard anyone.

No f***in way...easiest question I'll answer all week!

nope, any offense difference (if there really is one) Kirk more than makes up for on the other end, plus we already have Carter.

Kirk. Simple. Done.

im pretty sure bj holmes could do the same thing abrams is doing right now: run around until dja breaks down the D (tu's entire offensive set) and shoot jumpers. kirk definitely. defense. tenacity. goatee.

would you trade one of your guys for one of your rivals' guys you hate so much that you cant even see past youre own ineptitude? stupid thread

longhorn foozball: yes. i would make a trade for augustine haha he is one of the best pgs in the big 12 if not the nation, but i'd have to put some serious thought as to what would be a fair trade for him.

huh? let's put our words together before we type horn foozball

We already have Josh Carter. I would hate to have 2 guys sitting at the three point line. Abrams would not benefit our team the way Kirk does. I also wouldn't expect the horns to make this trade either as they rely on Abrams 2 point shot a lot.

Next

I'd trade Kirk for Abrams about as soon as I would have traded Acie for Durant. I wouldn't do it...ever. These are my BOYS! Fo' sho'!

Not even close

no way in hell

If Abrams shot is not falling, he gives you nothing. Kirk will make plays to help you win in every game he plays. No trade.

there is ONE trade that i would make with the horns, and this one isn't it.

Didnt Kirk completely shut down Abrams two weeks ago...?

Yeah. I think thats all that needs to be said.

Damion James and Abrams maybe, otherwise absolutely not.
Gig em!Coach Turge

The one game I saw them both play in this year, Kirk kicked A.J.'s butt.

Isn't that soooo cute! Abrams wants to be like his hero A.I.

So her wears a sock on his arm, just like his hero. A.I. doesn't need screens left and right and can actually create.

quote:

---

would you trade one of your guys for one of your rivals' guys you hate so much that you cant even see past youre own ineptitude? stupid thread

---

i would gladly trade augustine for sloan.

i will say, that no horns would make the trade either (and rightfully so). kirk would not thrive in tu's offense, and vice versa. tu is a more of a run and gun offense that benefits from having a two that has no conscious and loves to jack up threes. kirk cautious play would not work well with that mentality.

i don't think anyone, no matter how blinded by their hatred of their rival, would say that abrams is as good of a defensive player as kirk.

just like no ags would say that sloan is anywhere near as good as augustine.

Sloan, Elonu and Roland for Augustin (and the ESPN groupies). Yea....that's a good trade