based on how bad you want to win them

ku
itt
@ou
@tu
@bu

Mine goes

1)@tu
2)ku
3)@bu
4)itt
5)@ou

1 tu
2 ku
3 ttu
4 bu
5 ou

1. @tu
2. ku
3. tceh
4. @bu
5. @ou

*******************************************************


[This message has been edited by BigJohn127 (edited 2/9/2008 7:16p).]

@bu
ku
tech
@ut

@tu
@bu
KU
@ou
tt

Winning @tu & @bu will be important for seeding in the big 12 tournament. Beating KU gives us a signature win. Those 3 games could really be ranked any way you like. Losing @ou or to Tech is not going to be considered a bad loss when the committee looks at our resume, so they aren't as important IMO.

ku
@bu
@ut

1 ku
2 bu
3 tu
4 ttu
5 ou

tu obsession why am I not surprised

beating KU gives us our only shot at the title, home game senior day in front of countless recruits would create huge buzz and momentum going into postseason, signature win right before selection, much bigger game than "beating tu" which is all 80% of Aggies care about


[This message has been edited by EliteZags (edited 2/9/2008 7:36p).]

EliteZags,

We aren't winning the big 12, put down the pipe. If we are going to win the big 12, we won't be losing to Texas, KU, OR Baylor. I think coming in 2nd (which is achievable) is more important than winning against KU. We still lack a signature road win. Winning @tu is our best chance at a signature road win. Don't get me wrong, beating KU would be a big deal as well. But its not as obvious as the picture you are trying to paint.

I'm saying in the scenario beating KU could mean more if we are in position for the title(not impossible at this point), in my view the committee would see winning in Austin as more of a sweep than a signature road win, beating KU would be a true signature win pre selection that could be justification enough vault us over the edge of getting a protected seed
playing in LR/Houston would be huge for our tourney run

1. ku - that should be an EASY choice
2. tt - I can't stand the thought of another loss to those clowns
3.@tu
4.@bu