12th Man said:
Does it look to you like these guys were flying backwards under a bridge? The subject fly-by is to the mishap you relate what a shoplifted Snickers bar is to capital murder.
These Army Aviators were finna be skinned & made an example of, which is ruinous. We no longer operate in the understanding military milieu wherein Passed Midshipman Ernest King can stand on the quarterdeck, barf over the side and still become our first Fleet Admiral. In today's navy, Ensign Chester Nimitz would've been cashiered for running his destroyer onto a sandbar in Manila Bay.
It's okay to not see things my way, but I agree with SecWar: imco, the sin deserves neither the process nor the penance our zero-defect military mindset routinely demands.
The Marines have something called a FFPB, or field flight performance board. The Navy has a FNAEB, or Field Naval Aviator Evaluation Board. These are administrative and are fact finding investigations to look into factors that could have led to poor judgment or professionalism on the part of the aviator. They are always convened when there is a class A/B mishap, but also convened at the direction of the CO if professionalism and judgement are a concern.
I have seen, and been a part of, several FFPBs, where there was no "punishment" for the pilot. In fact, the opposite, the whole goal was to determine if they made a mistake, why they made that mistake, and if there is a way to remediate them and keep them flying.
I suspect the Army has something similar. I suspect there would have been an investigation, and the facts of the investigation would have shown why it happened, if they deviated from the flight as briefed, any potential safety violations, and whether those pilots should remain in flight status, be put in probation, or lose flight status, or lose their wings.
I doubt they would have been put in probation. But my doubt they would have been put in probation holds about as much weight as your thought that they were "finna be skinned & mad an example of."