To be clear, it is against the rules to improve the area you are about to drop (ie Pebble Beach/Sawgrass), improve the area a ball is rolling back (Pinehurst) and pat down the area behind your ball / cause it to move (Bay Hill). The issue is to enforce those rules, the officials have to prove intent. All someone like Wyndham has to do is deny.
Fair enough. For a first or second questionable offense, I don't care at all. But when it starts to happen consistently (four times within a half year), the pattern emerges and denial of intent becomes less believable.
If you want to call it good strategy to consistently push the rules into judgment territory and deny wrongdoing when questioned, to each their own.
Fair enough. For a first or second questionable offense, I don't care at all. But when it starts to happen consistently (four times within a half year), the pattern emerges and denial of intent becomes less believable.
If you want to call it good strategy to consistently push the rules into judgment territory and deny wrongdoing when questioned, to each their own.