Golf ball rollback

7,515 Views | 77 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by agracer
BayAg_14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
clobby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Might have to stock up
jonj101
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can't think of another sport that works so hard to undermine itself.
evestor1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This needs to happen. I am not a pro and routinely hit drives that carry 300 in humid sea-level climates.


That said, if this happens I'm buying a lifetime supply of pro-v
CyclingAg82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The people they would hurt the most are high single digit to mid teen handicappers.

They are theoretically adding two clubs to every approach shot.

Why can't these people just leave the game in a good place.

I lift weights, practice quite a bit in order to improve my accuracy and maintain decent distance.
CyclingAg82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
evestor1 said:

This needs to happen. I am not a pro and routinely hit drives that carry 300 in humid sea-level climates.

So you are one of very few people who can hit it that far, why mess with everyone else's game?
Duckhook
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The PGA Tour had previously said they would not support any rollback. Wonder what happens when the Tour and the ball manufacturers just say "nah, we're good". Except for USGA events (in the United States), we could still keep playing the current balls. And who's going to make a rolled back ball if everybody decides to ignore the USGA rule?

Interested to see how this shakes out.
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It will be interesting to see it all play out. If my memory serves me correctly, they didn't change club specs due to feedback of potential lawsuits.

As Adam Scott has stated, when he came on tour the driver was the hardest club to hit. Now it is the easiest.

It is supposed to take effect in 2028 for pros and 2030 for everyone.
Next Year is the Year
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't understand why they can't just come up with a standardized ball just for the pro tours, specifically one that just spins a lot more but doesn't hinder distance. Let everyone else outside of the tour players play whatever ball they want.
Mr.Bond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rolling back the ball for the general public is absolutely ****in STUPID
Im looking for Ray Finkle.... and a clean pair of shorts. Im just a very big Finkle fan. This is my Graceland, sir.


MAGA

98Ag99Grad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting to see how this will play out. Several major brands are against it so I can see lawsuits coming. I'm 47 and swing around 100mph with my driver. I'll be over 50 if this goes through in 2030 so maybe I'm moving up a set of tees? On the surface I'm not a fan of this for the everyday golfer. You shouldn't punish technology for improving the game for everyone.
NColoradoAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Next Year is the Year said:

I don't understand why they can't just come up with a standardized ball just for the pro tours, specifically one that just spins a lot more but doesn't hinder distance. Let everyone else outside of the tour players play whatever ball they want.
This was there original plan IIRC and the ball manufacturers pushed back hard. People want to play what the pros play and they dont want to have to manufacture two kinds of balls.

The whole thing is stupid
The Milkman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hugely in favor of rolling it back for the pros and bifurcating the game. Not a need to do it for amateurs though. But if that's what it takes to get it rolled back for pros then fine.

Most of us don't have the swing speed or ball speed necessary for it to make a difference
_lefraud_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's great, I love the idea of a stock or uniform ball for the pros. I'd like to see it even go a step further and have Augusta design their own ball, the same for all the majors. Make the manufacturers broker deals with tournaments and tournament sponsors.

I don't see leverage for the manufacturers. The USGA, R&A and PGAT don't need any of these manufacturers, the manufacturers need them.

And how could anyone stop manufacturers from selling the outlawed balls? Let the avg Joe play whatever.

I'm smart enough to know that I'm not using the same ball or club as Tiger, no matter what the advertising tells me.
AggieDruggist89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
**** that bull*****

I'm gonna keep playing the balls I use.

I'm not spending another 100s of hours trying to learn to play with some bull **** rolled back balls because some 20 year old roided out lab produced human specimen can swing a driver 145 mph.

BayAg_14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Milkman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If someone is facing a course that has carries they don't feel comfortable with they could perhaps try adjusting what tee box they play.

It's the same thing with pros. Theres no requirement they play courses at 7500 yards. If they were to set up courses strategically and intelligently, they can utilize more tee boxes and bring different hazards or features into play. Now they don't even have the option before of the distance they're essentially required to super tip it out.
AggieDruggist89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just get rid of par 5s and turn short par 4s into long par 3s. Then narrow the fairways and grow 6 inch rough. I'd watch them shoot +5 to win the tournament.

Why penalize the 99.9% of the golfing population who can't fly the ball more than 230 yards????
E
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just make everyone play with Pinnacle range balls…
clobby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why not keep it the same and watch them shoot -20. Protect some old guys ego?
The Milkman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieDruggist89 said:

Just get rid of par 5s and turn short par 4s into long par 3s. Then narrow the fairways and grow 6 inch rough. I'd watch them shoot +5 to win the tournament.

Why penalize the 99.9% of the golfing population who can't fly the ball more than 230 yards????


That just changes the score to par, not addressing the reason for the change. Courses can't keep getting bigger. And we can't reward this endless chase for speed and distance.

Also not to mention, narrow fairways and long rough does not punish long hitter or put a premium on accuracy. It does exactly the opposite
RebAg13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The pro ball needs to be rolled back
JYDog90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BayAg_14 said:




Move up a tee. That's going to have to be the answer. I don't really like that either and it's not without its problems.

I am an 8 and I can't hit it far at all, fortunately I play a short course. But when I go play GRINT tournaments, the guys in my flight are hitting it 50 yds past me. I'm 55 and I can't move up a tee so I quit playing them. I think we're going to have to figure out ways to decide what tees we can use or the stigma is going to have to somehow go away.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Milkman said:

Hugely in favor of rolling it back for the pros and bifurcating the game. Not a need to do it for amateurs though. But if that's what it takes to get it rolled back for pros then fine.

Most of us don't have the swing speed or ball speed necessary for it to make a difference

I agree and that is why even if they rollback the ball for everyone it won't have that big of impact on the average amateur. My teaching pro told me that in his experience it takes a driver swing speed of 115-120+ for the new ball technology to make a material difference on distance.

That said, I still think there should be a bifurcation for elite amateur and pro events.
98Ag99Grad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why is shooting -20 such a bad thing? It really doesn't bother me what the winning score is. I think the crazy US Open setups are just as ridiculous trying to keep scores down.
JCA1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know everyone hates Brandel but he made a good point this morning. The R&D and production costs for these new balls is gonna cost a ton of money and the pros ain't paying it. It'll be us regular Joe's who'll end up footing the bill for the new balls one way or another.
Poot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JCA1 said:

I know everyone hates Brandel but he made a good point this morning. The R&D and production costs for these new balls is gonna cost a ton of money and the pros ain't paying it. It'll be us regular Joe's who'll end up footing the bill for the new balls one way or another.


Yeah, new balls that are worse. Sounds great.
AggieDruggist89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Be serious,

How often do you walk off a course wishing the course was longer or wished your driver was shorter.

Not me.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a big nothing for average golfers. Look at this chart that shows the average handicapper has gone from 200 to 208 since 1996. The scratch guys have improved even less. The only group with a major improvement is the high handicappers which have added 24 yards which I believe is due to the much for forgiving clubs and not the balls.

The average distance for the pros has gone from 266 to 297 over the same time. The longest driver in 1996 was Daly at 289 vs McElroy did 327 last year.
JCA1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieDruggist89 said:

Be serious,

How often do you walk off a course wishing the course was longer or wished your driver was shorter.

Not me.



This is definitely true. But there's also an epidemic of people playing tee boxes they have no business being on. Just some irony there that we're gonna hear a ton of complaining about this and then those same people are gonna tee it up from 6900 yards while being a 17 index.
AggieDruggist89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And they'll be 25 with new balls.

OK, so I have no idea if these new balls will imapact us with 110mph or less driver swing speed.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieDruggist89 said:

And they'll be 25 with new balls.

OK, so I have no idea if these new balls will imapact us with 110mph or less driver swing speed.

Now if they ban the MISIG, that will be a major impact for many of us.
AggieDruggist89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

AggieDruggist89 said:

And they'll be 25 with new balls.

OK, so I have no idea if these new balls will imapact us with 110mph or less driver swing speed.

Now if they ban the MISIG, that will be a major impact for many of us.


That's when I will pick up beast mode full contact pickle ball to terrorize women and men over 75.
clobby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm curious how the rollback will effect pace of play. Guys aren't going to move up tee boxes.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
clobby said:

I'm curious how the rollback will effect pace of play. Guys aren't going to move up tee boxes.

Given for the vast majority of us it is only 5-10 yards off the tee if they go back to a 2000 vintage golf ball, I doubt it will be noticeable.

I actually think it will less than even the 5-10 yards because I think for us, the drivers have added most of that distance. I know the last 2 times I changed drivers I picked up 10+ yards vs my previous driver.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.