LETTUCE PRAY said:

---

I guess A&M wouldn't have much to gain from the matchup, but a small part of me misses playing them sometimes.

---

H0RNbyBIRTH said:

---

LETTUCE PRAY said:

---

I guess A&M wouldn't have much to gain from the matchup, but a small part of me misses playing them sometimes.

---

Sure A&M has something to gain, their dignity.

Since 2000, Tech is 7-5 over the aggies of college station.

Tech is daddy when it comes to aggie football.

---

TXAGBQ76 said:

---

LOL! Funny how you have to move the goalpost in an attempt to be somewhat relevant. The all time record is 37-32-1, making you an illegitimate step child. Since we won't the last game in 2011. 45-40, we own you in perpetuity, enjoy! Next you'll be patting yourself on the back for not losing to us since 2011; so sad what you feel the need to do to try and be relevant, tsk, tsk. I do agree with your comment we having nothing to gain, we have as much or more benefit playing Lamar.

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

I was just agreeing with the impartial Horn (by birth) about how dominant Tech is since the start of the new century. If you want to go back to the covered wagon days, fine, you can have that Scoreboard.

---

TXAGBQ76 said:

---

You can claim whatever you want to- real or imagined, whatever it takes to make you feel good about yourself.

---

H0RNbyBIRTH said:

---

LETTUCE PRAY said:

---

I guess A&M wouldn't have much to gain from the matchup, but a small part of me misses playing them sometimes.

---

Sure A&M has something to gain, their dignity.

Since 2000, Tech is 7-5 over the aggies of college station.

Tech is daddy when it comes to aggie football.

---

Tamuco99 said:

---

Well in that case, having won 7 of the last 10 against sip (including a 98-17 combined score in 2014-15) I guess TCU is the Josef Fritzl of t.u. football

---

H0RNbyBIRTH said:

---

Tamuco99 said:

---

Well in that case, having won 7 of the last 10 against sip (including a 98-17 combined score in 2014-15) I guess TCU is the Josef Fritzl of t.u. football

---

Typical aggie mentality.

Aggies cannot beat Texas so they D-ride TCU's record.

---

H0RNbyBIRTH said:

---

Tamuco99 said:

---

Well in that case, having won 7 of the last 10 against sip (including a 98-17 combined score in 2014-15) I guess TCU is the Josef Fritzl of t.u. football

---

Typical aggie mentality.

Aggies cannot beat Texas so they D-ride TCU's record.

---

The Hefty Lefty said:

---

Interesting play by the distinguished gentlemen from The Texas State University.

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

The Ags always want it both ways. They claim dominance over Tech in football but have to go back to the previous century to do so, but when we claim conference football championships won in the previous century, somehow those don't count. I put it down to "Aggie Logic."

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

The Ags always want it both ways. They claim dominance over Tech in football but have to go back to the previous century to do so, but when we claim conference football championships won in the previous century, somehow those don't count. I put it down to "Aggie Logic."

---

That's right the Border Conference. How can we forget. Right up there with the Big 10, SEC, and the likes.

---

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

The Ags always want it both ways. They claim dominance over Tech in football but have to go back to the previous century to do so, but when we claim conference football championships won in the previous century, somehow those don't count. I put it down to "Aggie Logic."

---

That's right the Border Conference. How can we forget. Right up there with the Big 10, SEC, and the likes.

---

---

Yes, the Border Conference. That was the conference Texas Tech was part of during that time. It's difficult to win the championship of a conference you're not part of. Are you suggesting conferences that are no long around, like the Border and the Southwest, don't count anymore?

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

The Ags always want it both ways. They claim dominance over Tech in football but have to go back to the previous century to do so, but when we claim conference football championships won in the previous century, somehow those don't count. I put it down to "Aggie Logic."

---

That's right the Border Conference. How can we forget. Right up there with the Big 10, SEC, and the likes.

---

---

Yes, the Border Conference. That was the conference Texas Tech was part of during that time. It's difficult to win the championship of a conference you're not part of. Are you suggesting conferences that are no long around, like the Border and the Southwest, don't count anymore?

---

No, but I don't brag about the 3 consecutive conference championships A&M from the mid 80's. I've actually grown up since then, you apparently still a hanger on'er.

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

The Ags always want it both ways. They claim dominance over Tech in football but have to go back to the previous century to do so, but when we claim conference football championships won in the previous century, somehow those don't count. I put it down to "Aggie Logic."

---

That's right the Border Conference. How can we forget. Right up there with the Big 10, SEC, and the likes.

---

---

Yes, the Border Conference. That was the conference Texas Tech was part of during that time. It's difficult to win the championship of a conference you're not part of. Are you suggesting conferences that are no long around, like the Border and the Southwest, don't count anymore?

---

No, but I don't brag about the 3 consecutive conference championships A&M from the mid 80's. I've actually grown up since then, you apparently still a hanger on'er.

---

I especially don't hang on to those Border Conference championships, only illustrating that Aggie logic. So you agree with me that the Aggies owned Tech in football in the previous century, and Red Raiders own A&M in this bright new century, correct? Because there's no other argument to made other than "A&M won the last game!"

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

The Ags always want it both ways. They claim dominance over Tech in football but have to go back to the previous century to do so, but when we claim conference football championships won in the previous century, somehow those don't count. I put it down to "Aggie Logic."

---

That's right the Border Conference. How can we forget. Right up there with the Big 10, SEC, and the likes.

---

---

Yes, the Border Conference. That was the conference Texas Tech was part of during that time. It's difficult to win the championship of a conference you're not part of. Are you suggesting conferences that are no long around, like the Border and the Southwest, don't count anymore?

---

No, but I don't brag about the 3 consecutive conference championships A&M from the mid 80's. I've actually grown up since then, you apparently still a hanger on'er.

---

I especially don't hang on to those Border Conference championships, only illustrating that Aggie logic. So you agree with me that the Aggies owned Tech in football in the previous century, and Red Raiders own A&M in this bright new century, correct? Because there's no other argument to made other than "A&M won the last game!"

---

A&M won the last game. 7-5 is not exactly "owning" so, you can that bit of something.

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Big 12-0 said:

---

The Ags always want it both ways. They claim dominance over Tech in football but have to go back to the previous century to do so, but when we claim conference football championships won in the previous century, somehow those don't count. I put it down to "Aggie Logic."

---

That's right the Border Conference. How can we forget. Right up there with the Big 10, SEC, and the likes.

---

---

Yes, the Border Conference. That was the conference Texas Tech was part of during that time. It's difficult to win the championship of a conference you're not part of. Are you suggesting conferences that are no long around, like the Border and the Southwest, don't count anymore?

---

No, but I don't brag about the 3 consecutive conference championships A&M from the mid 80's. I've actually grown up since then, you apparently still a hanger on'er.

---

I especially don't hang on to those Border Conference championships, only illustrating that Aggie logic. So you agree with me that the Aggies owned Tech in football in the previous century, and Red Raiders own A&M in this bright new century, correct? Because there's no other argument to made other than "A&M won the last game!"

---

A&M won the last game. 7-5 is not exactly "owning" so, you can that bit of something.

---

Well, if it isn't "owning," you also have to agree that 37-32-1 doesn't fit the definition, as well. If you space it out, 7-5 is roughly equal to 35-25, so the Red Raiders actually doing more "owning."

---

maroon barchetta said:

---

Tceh lost three in a row to the Ags before the Ags moved to the SEC. The "fat little girlfriends" presser was after one of those, correct?

---