Final Texas Big Dance Standings

2,937 Views | 29 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by TXAGBQ76
Big 12-0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1. Texas Tech: lost to NC State who made it to the Final Four
2. (tie) Baylor: Bama/Elite Eight
2. (tie) Houston: Duke/Elite Eight
4. (tie) Texas: Tenn/Sweet 16
4. (tie) Texas A&M: Houston/Sweet 16
6. TCU: Utah State/2nd Round

Congrats, Red Raiders!
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big 12-0 said:

1. Texas Tech: lost to NC State who made it to the Final Four
2. (tie) Baylor: Bama/Elite Eight
2. (tie) Houston: Duke/Elite Eight
4. (tie) Texas: Tenn/Sweet 16
4. (tie) Texas A&M: Houston/Sweet 16
6. TCU: Utah State/2nd Round

Congrats, Red Raiders!
Look, we all know you're mentally challenged. That is evidenced by your posts, this one being the latest example. How anyone can rate a team that got stove-piped in its opening round game better than three teams that all ROLLED their first round opponents just provides further evidence. Do you don a rainbow wig before you post?
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
Big 12-0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
carl spacklers hat said:

Big 12-0 said:

1. Texas Tech: lost to NC State who made it to the Final Four
2. (tie) Baylor: Bama/Elite Eight
2. (tie) Houston: Duke/Elite Eight
4. (tie) Texas: Tenn/Sweet 16
4. (tie) Texas A&M: Houston/Sweet 16
6. TCU: Utah State/2nd Round

Congrats, Red Raiders!
Look, we all know you're mentally challenged. That is evidenced by your posts, this one being the latest example. How anyone can rate a team that got stove-piped in its opening round game better than three teams that all ROLLED their first round opponents just provides further evidence. Do you don a rainbow wig before you post?
It's pretty simple: You can't judge a team's tourney performance on which round they lose in. Let's say A&M lost to UConn in the first round by 4 points, but then Texas plays them in the Elite Eight and loses by 20. You can't say Texas did better in the tourney just because they got to the Elite Eight while A&M lost in the First Round. NC State proved itself a Final Four beast.
buda91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fo-real das dum.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL! So you can't win, so you try to make some crap up to feel better. Arguing about who's loss is better is pretty stupid.- when watched the game championship game on the coach/chair like 64 other teams did.
What time is your big parade, what does the trophy look like you'll put in the "famous" case? Will it be a tortilla pained red saying "…yea, we lost again?"
BillYeoman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Houston won the Big 12 in hoops.

Swept Tech. Swept the horns.

The season is over. Let move on to College Football in 2024.

Big 12-0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BillYeoman said:

Houston won the Big 12 in hoops.

Swept Tech. Swept the horns.

The season is over. Let move on to College Football in 2024.


You forgot one very important detail: Red Raiders never got a home game against the Cougars this year, so the sweep needs an asterisk.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As with everyone of your posts, so you should probably by putting an asterisk on this one…
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BillYeoman said:

Houston won the Big 12 in hoops.

Swept Tech. Swept the horns.

The season is over. Let move on to College Football in 2024.




Yes! Let's do so!

Still waiting on the UH stadium photos on the other thread!
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BillYeoman said:

Houston won the Big 12 in hoops.

Swept Tech. Swept the horns.

The season is over. Let move on to College Football in 2024.


Y'all so bad in baseball that you're just skipping straight to football?
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big 12-0 said:

carl spacklers hat said:

Big 12-0 said:

1. Texas Tech: lost to NC State who made it to the Final Four
2. (tie) Baylor: Bama/Elite Eight
2. (tie) Houston: Duke/Elite Eight
4. (tie) Texas: Tenn/Sweet 16
4. (tie) Texas A&M: Houston/Sweet 16
6. TCU: Utah State/2nd Round

Congrats, Red Raiders!
Look, we all know you're mentally challenged. That is evidenced by your posts, this one being the latest example. How anyone can rate a team that got stove-piped in its opening round game better than three teams that all ROLLED their first round opponents just provides further evidence. Do you don a rainbow wig before you post?
It's pretty simple: You can't judge a team's tourney performance on which round they lose in. Let's say A&M lost to UConn in the first round by 4 points, but then Texas plays them in the Elite Eight and loses by 20. You can't say Texas did better in the tourney just because they got to the Elite Eight while A&M lost in the First Round. NC State proved itself a Final Four beast.


Go to your special Ed teacher and ask her to look up the definition of moral victory for you and spend her day trying to explain that difficult concept to you.
LOL OLD
BillYeoman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
carl spacklers hat said:

BillYeoman said:

Houston won the Big 12 in hoops.

Swept Tech. Swept the horns.

The season is over. Let move on to College Football in 2024.


Y'all so bad in baseball that you're just skipping straight to football?



Yes. Who follows college baseball?
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like you were pretty bad in football too since you finished next to last. uhhh downgrade!
Dark_Knight
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is some pretty low grade crap tier troll post, even for the OP.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big 12-0 said:

carl spacklers hat said:

Big 12-0 said:

1. Texas Tech: lost to NC State who made it to the Final Four
2. (tie) Baylor: Bama/Elite Eight
2. (tie) Houston: Duke/Elite Eight
4. (tie) Texas: Tenn/Sweet 16
4. (tie) Texas A&M: Houston/Sweet 16
6. TCU: Utah State/2nd Round

Congrats, Red Raiders!
Look, we all know you're mentally challenged. That is evidenced by your posts, this one being the latest example. How anyone can rate a team that got stove-piped in its opening round game better than three teams that all ROLLED their first round opponents just provides further evidence. Do you don a rainbow wig before you post?
It's pretty simple: You can't judge a team's tourney performance on which round they lose in. Let's say A&M lost to UConn in the first round by 4 points, but then Texas plays them in the Elite Eight and loses by 20. You can't say Texas did better in the tourney just because they got to the Elite Eight while A&M lost in the First Round. NC State proved itself a Final Four beast.


Actually you do. You lost to an 11 seed that barely got in the tourney at the time.
Big 12-0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muy said:

Big 12-0 said:

carl spacklers hat said:

Big 12-0 said:

1. Texas Tech: lost to NC State who made it to the Final Four
2. (tie) Baylor: Bama/Elite Eight
2. (tie) Houston: Duke/Elite Eight
4. (tie) Texas: Tenn/Sweet 16
4. (tie) Texas A&M: Houston/Sweet 16
6. TCU: Utah State/2nd Round

Congrats, Red Raiders!
Look, we all know you're mentally challenged. That is evidenced by your posts, this one being the latest example. How anyone can rate a team that got stove-piped in its opening round game better than three teams that all ROLLED their first round opponents just provides further evidence. Do you don a rainbow wig before you post?
It's pretty simple: You can't judge a team's tourney performance on which round they lose in. Let's say A&M lost to UConn in the first round by 4 points, but then Texas plays them in the Elite Eight and loses by 20. You can't say Texas did better in the tourney just because they got to the Elite Eight while A&M lost in the First Round. NC State proved itself a Final Four beast.


Actually you do. You lost to an 11 seed that barely got in the tourney at the time.

Yes, but that #11 team went to the Final Four. A lot of #1-2-3-4-5 seeds didn't make it that far.

That's why you play the games. You prove it on the court, not by reputation or how much money your team brings in.
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Checked in to see if Big12/0 was crazy enough
to still be arguing for his deluded point.
Yep.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
His struggle for attention and relevance is real, must be tough to constantly tread water and get nowhere.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
and you lost- on the court, which proves you were not as good as you are trying convince yourself your team was.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas Tech: can't win actual titles so they make up awards for themselves on a internet board of another school that wouldn't notice if TT disappeared tomorrow
Big 12-0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If football had a 64-team playoff:

Texas A&M defeats Utah State and Arkansas State before losing to Penn State in the Sweet 16. Penn State loses in the Elite 8.

Texas Tech loses to Georgia in the first round. Georgia makes the Final Four.

Aggie Logic: "Well, A&M did better because they got further in the tournament."
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas Tech Logic: "Look we know the trophy case is completely empty but did you show the recruits the award we gave ourselves for getting blown out by a way better team?!"
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL! You're the guy who is always trying to rationalize how "good" a loss is- in your ever attempt for attention and be relevant. You have never/ nor will you ever hear me do stupid rationalizations like that- that is your job.

BTW, Aggie logic is a win is a win and a loss is a loss.
Big 12-0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGBQ76 said:

LOL! You're the guy who is always trying to rationalize how "good" a loss is- in your ever attempt for attention and be relevant. You have never/ nor will you ever hear me do stupid rationalizations like that- that is your job.

BTW, Aggie logic is a win is a win and a loss is a loss.

Interesting…
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, that philosophy ranks right up there with "it is what it is"

Big 12-0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rongagin71 said:

Yeah, that philosophy ranks right up there with "it is what it is"



Does he realize that one of the "loss is a loss" was to the Red Raiders in basketball this season?
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It is what is
Big 12-0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So we can admit A&M losing bowl games are embarrassing losses without rationalizing that the best players sit out, etc.?
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't bet on games so get over a loss in about an hour.
Others, like you, seem to have a lot of ego involved and
possibly some money too. But let us not judge...
oh wait, one must develop judgment to win at betting.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Typical hyperbole based post. Still begging for attention and struggling to be relevant. Still allowing TAMU to own all of the limited space between your ears.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.