1. Michigan
2. Washington
3/4 FSU

Who's the last team?

Georgia, OSU, Alabama, or the sips?

Sips have the worst loss to #12 OU. Bama has the best win over Georgia. OSU loss was on the road at #3, now #1 Michigan.

Hard to put Alabama in over t.u. Hard to put Georgia in over Alabama. Hard to put OSU in without even winning their division. Hard to put t.u. in with the worst loss, and really only 2 big wins

Sips had the best win … over Alabama on the road. Georgia didn't even win their conference. Sips are easily in.

chlavinka said:

---

Sips had the best win … over Alabama on the road. Georgia didn't even win their conference. Sips are easily in.

---

We're about to find out how much "pull" Saban actually has.

chlavinka said:

---

Sips had the best win … over Alabama on the road. Georgia didn't even win their conference. Sips are easily in.

---

Bama had the best win, they knocked off the #1 team and ended a 29-game winning streak.

Georgia made the playoff a couple years ago after losing the CCG.

I think OSU gets in, the northern bias is strong. Alabama/Georgia are probably next up, I don't think they'll give it to Bama over t.u., but t.u. just isn't the caliber of the other 3 teams, despite an early season upset over Bama.

It reminds me of the year when Baylor and TCU were left on the outside in favor of OSU. The committee knew that TCU was better than Baylor, despite having lost to them earlier in the year, but Baylor wasn't good enough to put in over either TCU or OSU.

This really just makes the argument for 8 teams even stronger. 3 Undefeated power 5 conf champs, two of the best 5 teams with only 1 loss, and 2 1-loss power 5 conference champs.

Bama won the SEC. Bama did not beat a conference champion this year. The sips win is better. Doesn't take a rocket scientist .

All of the rest of that is gobbledydook

F the tsips. Weak schedule with powderpuffs. Committee should know better than to allow another big 12 team into the playoffs again.

Undefeated Conference champs:

1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. Florida State

One-loss Conference Champions

4. Texas (won head-to head match up with Alabama)
Alabama (lost head-to-head match up to Texas)

Dark_Knight said:

---

F the tsips. Weak schedule with powderpuffs. Committee should know better than to allow another big 12 team into the playoffs again.

---

Now you're just making s*** up.

It will be Ohio state or Georgia.

I know the #1 and #5 teams lost, but that's not enough for the sips to leapfrog from #7 to #4.

Texas is the show. The people want to see the show.

Credit to Sark (redemption story) for 2 trick-play TDs in our championship game and flashing Manning twice at the end of the season.

and you haters should kiss ou's ass for even making this an issue. We whipped bama's ass in tuscaloosa and it wasn't close. and just now, we're hitting our stride.

and listen up you aggie peckerwoods, don't come crying to me when sarks interracial marriage is the proverbial thumb on the scale. bwahaha

Plus the embarrassing 2A protests. The media would eat that up since they love them some collectivism …..hell crown the sips now!

Big 12-0 said:

---

Undefeated Conference champs:

1. Michigan
2. Washington
3. Florida State

One-loss Conference Champions

4. Texas (won head-to head match up with Alabama)
Alabama (lost head-to-head match up to Texas in Tuscaloosa)

---

FIFY.

Florida State doesn't belong; They are a shadow of themselves without injured QB Travis Hunter.
Humans understand this but it is hard to explain to a computer doing the rankings ......

OMeara said:

---

Florida State doesn't belong; They are a shadow of themselves without injured QB Travis Hunter.
Humans understand this but it is hard to explain to a computer doing the rankings ......

---

They have one of the best defenses in the nation. Beat some solid teams in a great conference. Undefeated.

Texas may be the closest thing the sec has to a representative. but this is for the bdf.
fsu is limping
big 10 not an issue.
the only one I worry about is wash. the northwest pacific coast gives me the willies.

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

Texas may be the closest thing the sec has to a representative. but this is for the bdf.
fsu is limping
big 10 not an issue.
the only one I worry about is wash. the northwest pacific coast gives me the willies.

---

How'd this work out?

Saban won't lose to sip twice.

Wow, being undefeated and winning your conference championship used to mean something.

Doesn't the fact that a committee, and not a competitive contest, decides who goes to the playoffs defeat the very purpose of a sport?

All of college football is a phacking beauty contest. It's phooking sickening.

"Wow, being undefeated and winning your really, really mediocre conference championship used to mean something"

FIFY

A lot of posts above need the Reed McKenzie stamp.

deer corn said:

---

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

Texas may be the closest thing the sec has to a representative. but this is for the bdf.
fsu is limping
big 10 not an issue.
the only one I worry about is wash. the northwest pacific coast gives me the willies.

---

How'd this work out?

Saban won't lose to sip twice.

---

Texas shouldn't be favored against Washington. They're higher ranked and the worst matchup for us.
We've had problems against QBs on fire. The kid from oU got very hot against us. Smith at UH played the game of his life. almost won. And Wash has that NFL bound QB. He's too good. their receivers are sick. The line is 4.5 and when some announcement comes out that Worthy will start, it'll move to 5.5. Vegas just wants that Texas money.

Other than michigan, Saban is the last thing to worry about. neither of them will beat us in H-town

Ok

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

deer corn said:

---

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

Texas may be the closest thing the sec has to a representative. but this is for the bdf.
fsu is limping
big 10 not an issue.
the only one I worry about is wash. the northwest pacific coast gives me the willies.

---

How'd this work out?

Saban won't lose to sip twice.

---

Texas shouldn't be favored against Washington. They're higher ranked and the worst matchup for us.
We've had problems against QBs on fire. The kid from oU got very hot against us. Smith at UH played the game of his life. almost won. And Wash has that NFL bound QB. He's too good. their receivers are sick. The line is 4.5 and when some announcement comes out that Worthy will start, it'll move to 5.5. Vegas just wants that Texas money.

Other than michigan, Saban is the last thing to worry about. neither of them will beat us in H-town

---

Why anybody could see that Texas will run over Washington, which only had to play weak PAC 12 teams like USC, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington State and Utah. Surely you're picking Texas by 28?

UTExan said:

---

Why anybody could see that Texas will run over Washington, which only had to play weak PAC 12 teams like USC, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington State and Utah. Surely you're picking Texas by 28?

---

a lot of wasted sarcasm to say that you agree w me.

of course beating the utes is no great shakes. poor injured babies that they are. a bowl in vegas? thought you lds boys only went to vegas to count money for the mob. womp womp

Quote:

---

Other than michigan, Saban is the last thing to worry about. neither of them will beat us in H-town

---

Uh... do you know Saban's record in revenge games?

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

deer corn said:

---

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

Texas may be the closest thing the sec has to a representative. but this is for the bdf.
fsu is limping
big 10 not an issue.
the only one I worry about is wash. the northwest pacific coast gives me the willies.

---

How'd this work out?

Saban won't lose to sip twice.

---

Texas shouldn't be favored against Washington. They're higher ranked and the worst matchup for us.
We've had problems against QBs on fire. The kid from oU got very hot against us. Smith at UH played the game of his life. almost won. And Wash has that NFL bound QB. He's too good. their receivers are sick. The line is 4.5 and when some announcement comes out that Worthy will start, it'll move to 5.5. Vegas just wants that Texas money.

Other than michigan, Saban is the last thing to worry about. neither of them will beat us in H-town

---

I might be the only one to think FSU should be there instead of Michigan.

Michigan got destroyed by TCU last year.

Texas velvet maestro said:

---

UTExan said:

---

Why anybody could see that Texas will run over Washington, which only had to play weak PAC 12 teams like USC, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington State and Utah. Surely you're picking Texas by 28?

---

a lot of wasted sarcasm to say that you agree w me.

of course beating the utes is no great shakes. poor injured babies that they are. a bowl in vegas? thought you lds boys only went to vegas to count money for the mob. womp womp

---

Vegas is just down the road on I 15. And a weekend getaway as well for us Utahans. We'll show up in force. But "lds boys"?

Copied from TexAgs premium football forum...

UTExan said:

---

Vegas is just down the road on I 15. And a weekend getaway as well for us Utahans. We'll show up in force. But "lds boys"?

---

just the swinging nomenclature of Frankie and Deano common to Sin City re the only ones Howard Hughes really trusted.

Chips2003 said:

---

Quote:

---

Other than michigan, Saban is the last thing to worry about. neither of them will beat us in H-town

---

Uh... do you know Saban's record in revenge games?

---

should I check out madeupstatistics.com?