SEC SEC SEC

10,260 Views | 88 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by BronkNagurski
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The truth itself refutes what you posted. Why waste time?

Now get back to work.......dude's been waiting at the window for his Jumbo Jack for almost 5 minutes
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't know randy had a ******* son
Agvet12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeShield37 said:

I knew there wouldn't be a cogent response or counter-argument to refute what I posted. So it's all good..Go ahead and do some self-reflection and process the truth about your institution.


You just posted a rant about feeling inferior, that was your assessment.

Terrible troll job
StrykerAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Damn even the tard came in to teabag this dork.
DeShield37
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UT whether you like it or not is considered the "GRAND DAME." UT is "GRAND" during good times and during bad times.. In other words we're relevant, the straw that stir the drink and the standard bearer at all times. Some of the "GRAND" programs are Michigan, Bama, Ohio State, Notre Dame, USC, the Blue Blood basketball programs, aTm is not in this league of "GRANDNESS." Reason being you don't have "SKINS" on the wall or notches on your belt e.g. World Series champions, College Football National Champions, etc.etc.. aTm is a regional program and not a national big-time program. Furthermore, to say your athletic program has surpassed TTU is a falsehood. TTU baseball and basketball programs are far superior. They have a better track program as well..You all are slightly and just a tad better in football and that's it. aTm is on par with Ole Miss, Miss St. and a cadre of other regional programs. You're not a national big time program and probably will never be especially with the cadre of mediocre coaches you have in your stable..
Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I remember my first beer.

Pro tip. Take the can to the dumpster so mom won't see it in the recycling bin.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BronkNagurski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeShield37 said:

UT whether you like it or not is considered the "GRAND DAME." UT is "GRAND" during good times and during bad times.. In other words we're relevant, the straw that stir the drink and the standard bearer at all times. Some of the "GRAND" programs are Michigan, Bama, Ohio State, Notre Dame, USC, the Blue Blood basketball programs, aTm is not in this league of "GRANDNESS." Reason being you don't have "SKINS" on the wall or notches on your belt e.g. World Series champions, College Football National Champions, etc.etc.. aTm is a regional program and not a national big-time program. Furthermore, to say your athletic program has surpassed TTU is a falsehood. TTU baseball and basketball programs are far superior. They have a better track program as well..You all are slightly and just a tad better in football and that's it. aTm is on par with Ole Miss, Miss St. and a cadre of other regional programs. You're not a national big time program and probably will never be especially with the cadre of mediocre coaches you have in your stable..
StrykerAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeShield37 said:

Furthermore, to say your athletic program has surpassed TTU is a falsehood. TTU baseball and basketball programs are far superior. They have a better track program as well..You all are slightly and just a tad better in football and that's it.


Probably the only thing I miss about the big 12 days was stomping tards that tried to compare their athletic department to ours, so thank you for this opportunity to relive a piece of the good old days.

Since our move to the SEC, Texas Tech has failed to have a winning conference record in any season, going 25-47 in the Big Dumpster Fire in that span. Tech went to only 4 bowl games, going 2-2 with wins in the Texas and Holiday Bowls and losses in the Texas and Birmingham Bowls. Tech had 3 seasons with a winning overall record and 5 losing seasons. Tech went 6-27 vs teams ranked in the top 25 at the time. Only two of those games were vs teams outside the BDF (both bowls) with Tech going 1-1. Tech has also had 3 head football coaches in this span.

Meanwhile A&M has only had 1 season with a losing record in conference play and 2 seasons with a winning conference record. A&M has finished with a winning overall record each of the last 8 seasons, finishing with less than 8 wins only once, and going 5-3 in bowls. That includes a thrashing of #11 BDF "co-champ" Oklahoma. A&M has gone 15-22 vs ranked teams including 6-2 vs ranked non-SEC teams. Both losses were to Clemson. We are on only our 2nd head football coach and he happens to have a BCS national championship and a College Football Playoff appearance under his belt, and was wanted by THE GRAND University of By God TEXASS
StrykerAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now that we covered football, let's talk about Tech and A&M's track teams lol

Men's Outdoor National Championships: A&M 4 (09, 10, 11, 13), Tech 1 (2019) FIRST MEN'S NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP IN ANY SPORT IN TARD HISTORY

Men's Indoor National Championships: A&M 1 (2017), Tech 0

Women's Outdoor National Championships: A&M 4 (09, 10, 11, 14), Tech 0

Our men's team is currently ranked #5 and our women #3. Tech's men are the defending champs and ranked #1 so you can argue their team is better than ours but to say Tech's overall track program is better than A&M's is foolishness. 9 national championships to 1 in the last 10 years!
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

UT whether you like it or not is considered the "GRAND DAME."
This is what makes you................you.

Y'all really don't have any idea the degree to which you're a laughingstock, do you? And you do it to yourselves.......the whole horns-down butthurt, the annual "we're baaaaaaaaaack" and inevitable subsequent faceplant, the joke that everyone outside Travis County recognizes your network as.........and that's not even getting started on the non-athletic aspects of what Herbie so accurately referred to as "the cesspool". (Dildo parades, masculinUT etc)

But thank you for perpetuating the stereotype. Please do continue. It's tradition after all. And God knows we do love our tradition around here.
whoop91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does any.other university utter the phrase " We're Back!"?

I dont think so. It is only uttered by those desperate for attention and trying to make others believe they belong. This is mostly followed promptly by being thrown out

This is why I love it when you guys say it. It is such a bad look but you keep doing it.
Flexbone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BronkNagurski said:

DeShield37 said:

UT whether you like it or not is considered the "GRAND DAME." UT is "GRAND" during good times and during bad times.. In other words we're relevant, the straw that stir the drink and the standard bearer at all times. Some of the "GRAND" programs are Michigan, Bama, Ohio State, Notre Dame, USC, the Blue Blood basketball programs, aTm is not in this league of "GRANDNESS." Reason being you don't have "SKINS" on the wall or notches on your belt e.g. World Series champions, College Football National Champions, etc.etc.. aTm is a regional program and not a national big-time program. Furthermore, to say your athletic program has surpassed TTU is a falsehood. TTU baseball and basketball programs are far superior. They have a better track program as well..You all are slightly and just a tad better in football and that's it. aTm is on par with Ole Miss, Miss St. and a cadre of other regional programs. You're not a national big time program and probably will never be especially with the cadre of mediocre coaches you have in your stable..



So mediocre coaches at our barely regional program are able to hammer your "national brand" in the talent acquisition department?

up-n-aTm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dixichkn said:

Quote:

UT whether you like it or not is considered the "GRAND DAME."
This is what makes you................you.

Y'all really don't have any idea the degree to which you're a laughingstock, do you? And you do it to yourselves.......the whole horns-down butthurt, the annual "we're baaaaaaaaaack" and inevitable subsequent faceplant, the joke that everyone outside Travis County recognizes your network as.........and that's not even getting started on the non-athletic aspects of what Herbie so accurately referred to as "the cesspool". (Dildo parades, masculinUT etc)

But thank you for perpetuating the stereotype. Please do continue. It's tradition after all. And God knows we do love our tradition around here.
Effin' brutal.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
David_Puddy said:

Dgrimesag92 said:

AggieBand2004 said:

Dgrimesag92 said:

How many of those 93 are Aggies? That's the only number I give a **** about. Screw the sec sec sec rah rah......win or stfu.

You seem lost. Go be a wet blanket somewhere else.
No scooter, I'm not lost. Keep pumping that sec sunshine. This is why the entire world makes fun of our fan base, idiots who ride the sec sec sec coattail. I wish every team in this league sucked , except us. You don't get it, the more powerful this conference is the more impossible it is to be dominant. Bama, LSU, Florida, Georgia, Auburn will compete year in and year out....we have to wait on a weak schedule and those five teams to be down....hoping its at the same time.

Self loathing Aggies are the worst. Holy sh-t buddy, take a Xanax some bleach or something.


FIFY
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeShield37 said:

UT whether you like it or not is considered the "GRAND DAME." UT is "GRAND" during good times and during bad times.. In other words we're relevant, the straw that stir the drink and the standard bearer at all times. Some of the "GRAND" programs are Michigan, Bama, Ohio State, Notre Dame, USC, the Blue Blood basketball programs, aTm is not in this league of "GRANDNESS." Reason being you don't have "SKINS" on the wall or notches on your belt e.g. World Series champions, College Football National Champions, etc.etc.. aTm is a regional program and not a national big-time program. Furthermore, to say your athletic program has surpassed TTU is a falsehood. TTU baseball and basketball programs are far superior. They have a better track program as well..You all are slightly and just a tad better in football and that's it. aTm is on par with Ole Miss, Miss St. and a cadre of other regional programs. You're not a national big time program and probably will never be especially with the cadre of mediocre coaches you have in your stable..


If by grand you mean ghey AF, then yes, you are always pretty damn grand.
Flexbone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeShield37 said:

UT whether you like it or not is considered the "GRAND DAME." UT is "GRAND" during good times and during bad times.. In other words we're relevant, the straw that stir the drink and the standard bearer at all times. Some of the "GRAND" programs are Michigan, Bama, Ohio State, Notre Dame, USC, the Blue Blood basketball programs, aTm is not in this league of "GRANDNESS." Reason being you don't have "SKINS" on the wall or notches on your belt e.g. World Series champions, College Football National Champions, etc.etc.. aTm is a regional program and not a national big-time program. Furthermore, to say your athletic program has surpassed TTU is a falsehood. TTU baseball and basketball programs are far superior. They have a better track program as well..You all are slightly and just a tad better in football and that's it. aTm is on par with Ole Miss, Miss St. and a cadre of other regional programs. You're not a national big time program and probably will never be especially with the cadre of mediocre coaches you have in your stable..


Let's follow this idiot's logic.

Texas is superior to A&M based on past accomplishments, even though A&M is better NOW (and for the majority of the lifetimes of posters here 40 or younger).

But Texas Tech is better at track because they're better RIGHT NOW, even though A&M has superior overall accomplishments.

This is why you live in a ****ty spec home and making six figures is a dream that will only be realized due to inflation.
Party Boy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeShield37 said:

UT whether you like it or not is considered the "GRAND DAME." UT is "GRAND" during good times and during bad times.. In other words we're relevant, the straw that stir the drink and the standard bearer at all times. Some of the "GRAND" programs are Michigan, Bama, Ohio State, Notre Dame, USC, the Blue Blood basketball programs, aTm is not in this league of "GRANDNESS." Reason being you don't have "SKINS" on the wall or notches on your belt e.g. World Series champions, College Football National Champions, etc.etc.. aTm is a regional program and not a national big-time program. Furthermore, to say your athletic program has surpassed TTU is a falsehood. TTU baseball and basketball programs are far superior. They have a better track program as well..You all are slightly and just a tad better in football and that's it. aTm is on par with Ole Miss, Miss St. and a cadre of other regional programs. You're not a national big time program and probably will never be especially with the cadre of mediocre coaches you have in your stable..
You sound like a f***ing f**got.
StrykerAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeShield37 said:

You're not a national big time program and probably will never be especially with the cadre of mediocre coaches you have in your stable..
Texas A&M's Buzz Williams named SEC Coach of the Year by AP
BronkNagurski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
StrykerAg said:

DeShield37 said:

You're not a national big time program and probably will never be especially with the cadre of mediocre coaches you have in your stable..
Texas A&M's Buzz Williams named SEC Coach of the Year by AP
Yeah, and Jimbo is a slouch.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.