Texan1976 said:
Flexbone said:
Texan1976 said:
Maybe he can one day go 5-6 against acc level competition with five top five ranked classes in a row and then use that to find a desperate sucker to guarantee him $75 million.
You mean he had the exact same record that Herman did in Year 1 at Texas with similar recruiting classes and against less than half the amount of NFL talent? Desperate sucker? The same LSU program that's going to kick the **** out of your tshirt team in about 6 months tried to hire him the year before. I guess a few programs are desperate to higher the coach with the highest winning percentage in ACC history, a guy who averages over 10 wins a season in his career. Imagine how desperate we'd have to be to hire a psychotic drunk who cheats on his wife and breaks NCAA rules from the American Conference.
You are such a pathetic, stupid mother****er.
I post simple facts and you respond frothing at the mouth with vulgarities. I guess 1939 and 1998 are tough to overcome.
LSU also tried to "higher" Herman. And struck out. Little Jimbo is on his retirement gig now. And you are the suckers.
And Little Jimbo was 5-6 his last year at FSU.
I wouldn't talk too much about drinking. Fisher looks perpetually hungover.
Just waiting for you to start "insulting" Jimbo for his wife's alleged cheating, like you've done so many times in the past, proving just what a low-life, pathetic tool you are.
Jimbo was 5-6? Jimbo wasn't allowed to coach the final two games of the season - against UL-Monroe and the bowl - because he'd already agreed to be our coach the next season. You're trying to act like he had a losing record when he didn't, which is just more pathetic hilarity. He went 7-6, just like Tommy did in Year 1 at Texas. And unlike Tommy, he lost his QB, as well as a ton of other players. He also did it against better talent.
You're not posting "simple facts." You're posting absurd, twisted drivel in order to try to make yourself feel better about your own sad life. 2005 is just as irrelevant as 1939 is, champ. 2009 is just as irrelevant as 1998. If they weren't, Texas wouldn't have been so ****ty the last decade. Nor would A&M be better than Texas now, which they are.
Jimbo finished 2nd in the most difficult and talented division in the sport in Year 1, behind a program that's the greatest dynasty the sport has ever had. I think everyone here is pretty happy with that result. Tell us - how'd Tommy do his first year in the weakest league in the sport? Tell us, how'd he have done this past year in the our division?
I'll let others take over from here. What an incredible tool.