Wasn't there an analysis done a few years back that showed the rise in rankings for kids who committed to sip and fall in rankings for kids to A&M? It was pretty damning in that is showed the bias in Ketch's rankings system. A kid could magically fall further in the ranks after committing to A&M.

Satellite of Love said:

---

Wasn't there an analysis done a few years back that showed the rise in rankings for kids who committed to sip and fall in rankings for kids to A&M? It was pretty damning in that is showed the bias in Ketch's rankings system. A kid could magically fall further in the ranks after committing to A&M.

---

Ags have their Super Bowl party coming up... some players are supposed to commit at it. Time to watch their rankings tank in real time.

Bo Darville said:

---

Your Friend said:

---

Relax, man

---

Kill yourself, man.

---

Don't bother. He has tried. He couldn't even get that right.

blazing7s94 said:

---

Bo Darville said:

---

Your Friend said:

---

Relax, man

---

Kill yourself, man.

---

Don't bother. He has tried. He couldn't even get that right.

---

Come on, now.

Your Friend said:

---

I have my own place

---

Your mom's basement isn't your own place. It's just a place within hers that you borrow.

DecadePlan said:

---

I love watching their faux recruiting ranking move up and up. That way, when their team produces as the squad of 3*s that they really are, it backfires on them.

"What, Herman can't win with a #3 ranked recruiting class?"

---

Ding, ding, ding.

Sets inflated expectations based on perceived roster talent .... wash, rinse, repeat.

So sip Burton was a tennis player football player wannabe. Who got a job evaluating high school football players. It all makes sense now.

DayAg! said:

---

So sip Burton was a tennis player football player wannabe. Who got a job evaluating high school football players. It all makes sense now.

---

Burton doesn't do much these days. He got rich of Rivals.

247 ranks Texas recruits the lowest of all the services comprising the composite. 247 has 18 of our recruits lower than the composite.

With the competition the BDF presents, it dont make much difference what titty twister Tom recruits.

DayAg! said:

---

With the competition the BDF presents, it dont make much difference what titty twister Tom recruits.

---

1939

Texan1976 said:

---

DayAg! said:

---

With the competition the BDF presents, it dont make much difference what titty twister Tom recruits.

---

1939

---

16-16. The results of the past 32 games in football between the Aggies and the sips.

If your sips were so great, with so much more talent than the Aggies - why did you lose so much to us (even with the refs helping you early and often)?

Possible Answers:

A) The Aggies play with more heart, enough to consistently beat a supposedly better team
B) The sips are overrated
C) The Aggies are underrated
D) Manipulation of the space-time continuum.
E) All of the above

Any and all answers listed above show you suck. Take your vacuum lips to your own borrowed (since they refused to admit you academically) sports board. Gig'Em!

Sounds like you are happy with A&M's performance. What exactly is in the "Hall of Champions"?

Texan1976 said:

---

Sounds like you are happy with A&M's performance. What exactly is in the "Hall of Champions"?

---

Nope. Not happy. You see -- we Aggies look at the past decade and see that there is work to do. That we need improvement. Better everything. We join the best conference. We build the largest and best college football stadium in Texas (and the SEC). We build the best football facilities in the nation. We go get the best coach in college football. We start recruiting and signing the best players. We have always had the best fans and traditions.

Now, you sips - you are delusional. You sit on your hands and dream of the days of racial segregation and 16" TV screens and artificially increase the star count of your recruits.

Let me introduce you to the reality of the past decade. Like most sips -- you are blocking out that you *were* Texas. Here, let me remind you of your t-shirt team's prowess in this decade:

2010: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls- ranked #3 nationally recruiting
2011: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #3 nationally recruiting
2012: 9-4 - finished season ranked 18th in polls - ranked #2 nationally recruiting
2013: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #24 nationally recruiting
2014: 6-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #20 nationally recruiting
2015: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #12 nationally recruiting
2016: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #11 nationally recruiting
2017: 7-6 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #31 nationally recruiting
2018: 10-4 - finished season ranked 9th in polls - ranked #4 nationally recruiting
Total W-L: 63-52

So, for the 9 seasons this decade: 4 seasons t.u. has a had a losing record (44%) , 7 seasons t.u. finished unranked (77%), 4 seasons (44%) t.u. won a bowl game. 0 seasons was t.u. nationally relevant (00%). All seasons -- your team wore dirty baby diaper poop as its team color.

This, all the while playing in a weak conference with weak teams in small stadiums and smaller crowds on regional TV. And -- you hired a coach that's just plain nuts. Wow. Yes, please keep telling us how great your t-shirt team is.



Meanwhile, over in Aggieland:
2010: 9-4 - finished season #19 in polls- ranked #17 nationally recruiting
2011: 6-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #27 nationally recruiting
2012: 11-2 - finished season ranked 5th in polls - ranked #15 nationally recruiting
2013: 9-4 - finished season ranked 18th in polls - ranked #11 nationally recruiting
2014: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #21 nationally recruiting
2015: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #10 nationally recruiting
2016: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #17 nationally recruiting
2017: 7-6 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #10 nationally recruiting
2018: 9-4 - finished season ranked 16th in polls - ranked #16 nationally recruiting
Total W-L: 75-42

So, for the 9 seasons this decade: 1 season the good guys a had a losing record (11%) , 5 seasons the Aggies finished unranked (55%), 5 seasons (55%) the Aggies won a bowl game. 3 seasons was A&M was nationally relevant (33%). All seasons the Aggies wear the beauty that is Maroon on their uniforms.

This, all the while playing mostly in the best conference with the best teams in the largest stadiums and even larger crowds on national TV. The Aggies did a lot more, a *lot* more with recruits rated less than the sips.

The Aggies have won 12 more games this decade and lost 10 fewer games than the Longhorns.

The Aggies did not not lose to Iowa State (twice), Maryland (twice), Tceh, California (twice), Kansas State (4x), Kansas, BYU (twice), or other "national powers". LOL, LMAO.

So, let me give you some advice: when you go to Wal-Mart and find a school to root for -- do it with reality staring in your face -- not what happened back when gas was 12 cents a gallon.

You see -- A&M -- we *are* Texas. See the difference? It's evident from that above data -- and we are working to get better. Not smacking our lips about the ancient past.

sip skull crushed again.

PosterFormallyKnownAsRojo said:

---

Texan1976 said:

---

Sounds like you are happy with A&M's performance. What exactly is in the "Hall of Champions"?

---

Nope. Not happy. You see -- we Aggies look at the past decade and see that there is work to do. That we need improvement. Better everything. We join the best conference. We build the largest and best college football stadium in Texas (and the SEC). We build the best football facilities in the nation. We go get the best coach in college football. We start recruiting and signing the best players. We have always had the best fans and traditions.

Now, you sips - you are delusional. You sit on your hands and dream of the days of racial segregation and 16" TV screens and artificially increase the star count of your recruits.

Let me introduce you to the reality of the past decade. Like most sips -- you are blocking out that you *were* Texas. Here, let me remind you of your t-shirt team's prowess in this decade:

2010: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls- ranked #3 nationally recruiting
2011: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #3 nationally recruiting
2012: 9-4 - finished season ranked 18th in polls - ranked #2 nationally recruiting
2013: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #24 nationally recruiting
2014: 6-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #20 nationally recruiting
2015: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #12 nationally recruiting
2016: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #11 nationally recruiting
2017: 7-6 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #31 nationally recruiting
2018: 10-4 - finished season ranked 9th in polls - ranked #4 nationally recruiting
Total W-L: 63-52

So, for the 9 seasons this decade: 4 seasons t.u. has a had a losing record (44%) , 7 seasons t.u. finished unranked (77%), 4 seasons (44%) t.u. won a bowl game. 0 seasons was t.u. nationally relevant (00%). All seasons -- your team wore dirty baby diaper poop as its team color.

This, all the while playing in a weak conference with weak teams in small stadiums and smaller crowds on regional TV. And -- you hired a coach that's just plain nuts. Wow. Yes, please keep telling us how great your t-shirt team is.



Meanwhile, over in Aggieland:
2010: 9-4 - finished season #19 in polls- ranked #17 nationally recruiting
2011: 6-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #27 nationally recruiting
2012: 11-2 - finished season ranked 5th in polls - ranked #15 nationally recruiting
2013: 9-4 - finished season ranked 18th in polls - ranked #11 nationally recruiting
2014: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #21 nationally recruiting
2015: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #10 nationally recruiting
2016: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #17 nationally recruiting
2017: 7-6 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #10 nationally recruiting
2018: 9-4 - finished season ranked 16th in polls - ranked #16 nationally recruiting
Total W-L: 75-42

So, for the 9 seasons this decade: 1 season the good guys a had a losing record (11%) , 5 seasons the Aggies finished unranked (55%), 5 seasons (55%) the Aggies won a bowl game. 3 seasons was A&M was nationally relevant (33%). All seasons the Aggies wear the beauty that is Maroon on their uniforms.

This, all the while playing mostly in the best conference with the best teams in the largest stadiums and even larger crowds on national TV. The Aggies did a lot more, a *lot* more with recruits rated less than the sips.

The Aggies have won 12 more games this decade and lost 10 fewer games than the Longhorns.

The Aggies did not not lose to Iowa State (twice), Maryland (twice), Tceh, California (twice), Kansas State (4x), Kansas, BYU (twice), or other "national powers". LOL, LMAO.

So, let me give you some advice: when you go to Wal-Mart and find a school to root for -- do it with reality staring in your face -- not what happened back when gas was 12 cents a gallon.

You see -- A&M -- we *are* Texas. See the difference? It's evident from that above data -- and we are working to get better. Not smacking our lips about the ancient past.

---

1998.

1939.

Texan1976 said:

---

PosterFormallyKnownAsRojo said:

---

Texan1976 said:

---

Sounds like you are happy with A&M's performance. What exactly is in the "Hall of Champions"?

---

Nope. Not happy. You see -- we Aggies look at the past decade and see that there is work to do. That we need improvement. Better everything. We join the best conference. We build the largest and best college football stadium in Texas (and the SEC). We build the best football facilities in the nation. We go get the best coach in college football. We start recruiting and signing the best players. We have always had the best fans and traditions.

Now, you sips - you are delusional. You sit on your hands and dream of the days of racial segregation and 16" TV screens and artificially increase the star count of your recruits.

Let me introduce you to the reality of the past decade. Like most sips -- you are blocking out that you *were* Texas. Here, let me remind you of your t-shirt team's prowess in this decade:

2010: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls- ranked #3 nationally recruiting
2011: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #3 nationally recruiting
2012: 9-4 - finished season ranked 18th in polls - ranked #2 nationally recruiting
2013: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #24 nationally recruiting
2014: 6-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #20 nationally recruiting
2015: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #12 nationally recruiting
2016: 5-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #11 nationally recruiting
2017: 7-6 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #31 nationally recruiting
2018: 10-4 - finished season ranked 9th in polls - ranked #4 nationally recruiting
Total W-L: 63-52

So, for the 9 seasons this decade: 4 seasons t.u. has a had a losing record (44%) , 7 seasons t.u. finished unranked (77%), 4 seasons (44%) t.u. won a bowl game. 0 seasons was t.u. nationally relevant (00%). All seasons -- your team wore dirty baby diaper poop as its team color.

This, all the while playing in a weak conference with weak teams in small stadiums and smaller crowds on regional TV. And -- you hired a coach that's just plain nuts. Wow. Yes, please keep telling us how great your t-shirt team is.



Meanwhile, over in Aggieland:
2010: 9-4 - finished season #19 in polls- ranked #17 nationally recruiting
2011: 6-7 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #27 nationally recruiting
2012: 11-2 - finished season ranked 5th in polls - ranked #15 nationally recruiting
2013: 9-4 - finished season ranked 18th in polls - ranked #11 nationally recruiting
2014: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #21 nationally recruiting
2015: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #10 nationally recruiting
2016: 8-5 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #17 nationally recruiting
2017: 7-6 - finished season unranked in polls - ranked #10 nationally recruiting
2018: 9-4 - finished season ranked 16th in polls - ranked #16 nationally recruiting
Total W-L: 75-42

So, for the 9 seasons this decade: 1 season the good guys a had a losing record (11%) , 5 seasons the Aggies finished unranked (55%), 5 seasons (55%) the Aggies won a bowl game. 3 seasons was A&M was nationally relevant (33%). All seasons the Aggies wear the beauty that is Maroon on their uniforms.

This, all the while playing mostly in the best conference with the best teams in the largest stadiums and even larger crowds on national TV. The Aggies did a lot more, a *lot* more with recruits rated less than the sips.

The Aggies have won 12 more games this decade and lost 10 fewer games than the Longhorns.

The Aggies did not not lose to Iowa State (twice), Maryland (twice), Tceh, California (twice), Kansas State (4x), Kansas, BYU (twice), or other "national powers". LOL, LMAO.

So, let me give you some advice: when you go to Wal-Mart and find a school to root for -- do it with reality staring in your face -- not what happened back when gas was 12 cents a gallon.

You see -- A&M -- we *are* Texas. See the difference? It's evident from that above data -- and we are working to get better. Not smacking our lips about the ancient past.

---

1998.

1939.

---

Really? That's the best you have?

Sips coming over here beating their chest about nothing. Poor *******s think they're relevant.

Your Friend said:

---

I have my own place

---

A 400 sq ft efficiency in Irving is only loosely "my place"

A&M last played for a conference title more than 20 years ago. Over that period, they've been in 2 conferences, which have had 25 other teams in them. Out of that group, the teams that have a longer drought of playing for a conference title are:

Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Kentucky, Kansas, Iowa St, Tech

Texan1976 said:

---

A&M last played for a conference title more than 20 years ago. Over that period, they've been in 2 conferences, which have had 25 other teams in them. Out of that group, the teams that have a longer drought of playing for a conference title are:

Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Kentucky, Kansas, Iowa St, Tech

---

Weird how several of those teams you mentioned would be favored to beat your ****ty team. They actually can manage to field Top 50 units in at least one side of the ball.

Flexbone said:

---

Texan1976 said:

---

A&M last played for a conference title more than 20 years ago. Over that period, they've been in 2 conferences, which have had 25 other teams in them. Out of that group, the teams that have a longer drought of playing for a conference title are:

Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Kentucky, Kansas, Iowa St, Tech

---

Weird how several of those teams you mentioned would be favored to beat your ****ty team. They actually can manage to field Top 50 units in at least one side of the ball.

---

Like Georgia was favored? Or FSU with Jimbo when Herman destroyed his top 5 talent with UH two stars? Or when Boston College and their 5 players with a 4 star ranking went in dry on Jimbo 35-3?

You guys spent $75 million guaranteed on someone who somehow went 5-6 with 5 classes of top 5 talent. And then brag about your dumbassery.

And I love the character of Winston and Francois, Jimbo.

Texan1976 said:

---

Flexbone said:

---

Texan1976 said:

---

A&M last played for a conference title more than 20 years ago. Over that period, they've been in 2 conferences, which have had 25 other teams in them. Out of that group, the teams that have a longer drought of playing for a conference title are:

Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Kentucky, Kansas, Iowa St, Tech

---

Weird how several of those teams you mentioned would be favored to beat your ****ty team. They actually can manage to field Top 50 units in at least one side of the ball.

---

Like Georgia was favored? Or FSU with Jimbo when Herman destroyed his top 5 talent with UH two stars? Or when Boston College and their 5 players with a 4 star ranking went in dry on Jimbo 35-3?

You guys spent $75 million guaranteed on someone who somehow went 5-6 with 5 classes of top 5 talent. And then brag about your dumbassery.

And I love the character of Winston and Francois, Jimbo.

---

Let's discuss bad losses by your current coach or his ****ing "character."

You're one stupid mother****er. What else did Jimbo do with those classes?

Hilarious to watch your dumbass try to cherry pick data. "The last 20 years...". Yeah, we'll over the last 40+ A&M has more conference titles than Texas.

"Herman won this one game!" Yeah, well he lost these others that were ****ing awful and cancel out the good. He's also a Grade A embarrassing dewshbag that fits in perfectly at that piece of **** school.

"Jimbo lost these games!" Yeah, well he won some pretty big other ones and you're lying your ass off if you're trying to convince us that you'd rather have Tom Herman than Jimbo Fisher.

Texan1976 said:

---

A&M last played for a conference title more than 20 years ago. Over that period, they've been in 2 conferences, which have had 25 other teams in them. Out of that group, the teams that have a longer drought of playing for a conference title are:

Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Kentucky, Kansas, Iowa St, Tech

---

Wow. You just received a complete beat down on your previous posts -- and you are back again.

Two questions. The answer to the first question is "1". The answer to the second question is "2".

Do you know what the questions are?



Question 1: How many Big 12 Titles did R.C. Slocum win as Texas A&M's head Coach (7 years)?

Answer 1: 1. (Overall, R.C. Slocum won 4 Conference Championships, 3 SWC, 1 B12)


Question 2: How many Big 12 Titles did Mack Brown win as t.u. head coach (16 years)?

Answer 2: 2. (Overall, Mack Brown won just 2 Conference Championships, 2 B12).

So, the "greatest" sip coach in the modern era only won half as many Conference Championships as the legendary R. C. Slocum. Yet, that school you root for because there was a sale at Wal-Mart on unisex apparel thinks that they ruled the roost. Nope. They just owned the refs.

Texan1976 said:

---

Like Georgia was favored? Or FSU with Jimbo when Herman destroyed his top 5 talent with UH two stars? Or when Boston College and their 5 players with a 4 star ranking went in dry on Jimbo 35-3?

You guys spent $75 million guaranteed on someone who somehow went 5-6 with 5 classes of top 5 talent. And then brag about your dumbassery.

And I love the character of Winston and Francois, Jimbo.

---

None of your games mentioned have anything to do with a single player on the Aggies roster.
But now Maryland?
TWICE!
Nice picking an choosing irrelevant games that literally no one cares about or remembers.