Impressive

http://vote2003.ss.ca.gov/Returns/recall/mapN4.htm

Even More Impressive
http://vote2003.ss.ca.gov/Returns/gov/mapB.htm

And your point is.......

^
|
Wittle baby sad that Gway isn't gubenor?

I'm just happy that the election is over and they can get that goose-stepping 'roid head off the TV screen for a few minutes. Now that he's got the job, he's out of sight.

A ham sandwich would be a better gov. than Davis.

Personally, though, I wish the recall would have failed, for two reasons:

1. California could then see what happens when you elect vote-buying, slash and burn, punish-the-producers/reward-the-parasite Dems to run the state. Like a crack addict, they have to hit rock bottom before they really learn their lesson, and I don't think they're quite there yet.

2. Cali's utter collapse would be a perfect laboratory specimen for the rest of the country, showing the natural conclusion of the big-government nanny state.

Hook'em

Great links Chonghorn

edit: I think that qualifies as a mandate

[This message has been edited by stevee (edited 10/8/2003 6:23p).]

Damn LIBERALS are taking over everywhere.

Arnold is not a liberal.

No, he's a bought and paid for numbnut who can't even pronounce the word "governor" correctly. I'm no fan of any politician, but at least they're adept at being lying sacks of s***. This guy won't even be good at that.

Arnold is a liberal on social issues and a moderate on economic issues (at least, that's how it appears right now, nobody really knows about the economics part, including Arnold). He's pro-marijuana legalization, pro-abortion, pro-gun control, gropes women, and is married to a Kennedy.

That makes him a liberal, in my opinion.

I hate commies (as well as tsips and the red-ijjits) but here's where communism has capitalism and democracy beat to hell:
USSR: Bureaucrats.
USA: Bureaucrats and pinhead politicians and big money a&&wipes pulling the strings.
(note the emoticon rednecks)