quote:

---

7. Texas Tech

Injuries kept the Sticks vs. Potts debate from really heating up this spring, but the switch to a higher risk/reward strategy with an aggressive defense could be fun to watch next season. The Red Raiders are deep at running back and receiver, but look for the former to get more touches this fall than they have in over a decade.

---

[This message has been edited by BMEDAggie11 (edited 5/4/2010 12:45a).]

...implying this was unexpected and that K has been saying otherwise.

You got us there, chief. Wow.

didn't see this post already, dumbass? the one YOU commented on?

http://www.texags.com/main/forum.reply.asp?topic_id=1619721&forum_id=6

The comment needed it's own thread. Go **** yourself, padre

quote:

---

...implying this was unexpected and that K has been saying otherwise.

---

Hmm...

quote:

---

Tceh's offense will not change appreciably next season

---

quote:

---

If you think Tceh is going to consistently run the ball 20-30 times a game, you're out of your GD mind

---

quote:

---

We'll still be at or near the top of every passing category in the conference next year

---

quote:

---

BMEDAggie11
posted 1:05a, 05/04/10



The comment needed it's own thread. Go **** yourself, padre

---

BMED referring to TheGoddess as his father... mental note taken and go figure.

[This message has been edited by Johnny_Cochran_Ag (edited 5/4/2010 1:10a).]

It's true

quote:

---

A&M still only won six games last season.

---

*shrug*

quote:

---

quote:Tceh's offense will not change appreciably next season

---

quote:

---

quote:If you think Tceh is going to consistently run the ball 20-30 times a game, you're out of your GD mind

---

Didnt Doc just recently set his O//U prediction at 25-28 runs/game? Whats the matter, read conflicting opinion pieces?

quote:

---

quote:We'll still be at or near the top of every passing category in the conference next year

---

Despite having two losing seasons in a row, the Ags are improving. I think they'll have a winning season. The Arkansas game will tell alot about whether they can be in the mix for the title.

I think OU and Texas continue to own the division.

I've said it many times, I want the Ags to be back to where they were 15 or 20 years ago and T-day becomes the South division championship.

I didn't even say two of those.

And yes, my o/u is 27.5 running plays per game.

Which one did you say?

I said you are out of your mind if you think tech will run 28-30 times every game. Of course hostile ammended it and then added a couple of his own.

Since I posted that we've watched Brown bring a version of the qb keeper here, so I figure he'll run about 3-5 of those per game, so the o/u is set at 27.5.

Then again, we should probably be focusing more on percentages rather than total, since Brown wants to hit 90-100 plays pretty regularly

quote:

---

I said you are out of your mind if you think tech will run 28-30 times every game.

---

So you're saying Hostile is lying, and fabricated the numbers in the quote youre admitting to?

You're out of your GD mind if you think Tech runs the ball 28+ times a game, no way, not happening.

I set the O/U at 27.5.

quote:

---

Since I posted that we've watched Brown bring a version of the qb keeper here

---

That oughta work well, with both of your QBs being less durable than Cart.

Doesn't surprise me one bit that VM disregarded the rest of my post in attempt to win laugh/cry points with Sam.

So f***ing pathetic

quote:

---

I said you are out of your mind if you think tech will run 28-30 times every game. Of course hostile ammended it and then added a couple of his own.

Since I posted that we've watched Brown bring a version of the qb keeper here, so I figure he'll run about 3-5 of those per game, so the o/u is set at 27.5.

---

gold

So you're saying that even before a QB keeper was installed that you were expecting to set the O/U at 24.5 but posted that there was no way it would be over 28?

Come on man.

quote:

---

in attempt to win laugh/cry points

---

Paging Dr. Irony

quote:

---

attempt to win laugh/cry

---

says the guy with more laugh/cry points than the rest of posters combined

Kay has laugh/cry Scoreboard*

*The only thing that matters

quote:

---

So you're saying that even before a QB keeper was installed that you were expecting to set the O/U at 24.5 or 22.5 but posted that there was no way it would be over 28?

Come on man

---

i admitted that i said that before the spring and before i saw the QB's running a few keepers. that will definitely add a few more running plays to each game.

i think the RB's will end up averaging about 23 carries per game, if the play total stays the same. if Brown runs 100 plays per game, it will be higher than that. depends on how often he goes to no-huddle.

all of this stems from the claims you guys continue to make that Tubs is about to revert back to his old ways of SEC football, negating the advantage that Tech has enjoyed under the Leach's Spread. We have maintained that Leach's offense will be changing b/c Leach isnt here anymore, but it wont be changing in the ways you guys hope it will. you want us to line up in the I and run the ball three times, b/c you know Tech doesnt have the athletes along the line to play that type of football. you dont want us to run another type of the Spread b/c it gives us a better chance of winning. and i dont blame you. but you guys comfort yourselves by fabricating posts and saying that ALL Tech fans say that NOTHING is EVER going to...it will be the EXACT same offense as Leach ran...blahblahblah. but none of us have ever said that. we said most of the changes will be subtle and wont even be noticed (routes, formations, terminology).

is there anything else you guys want to talk about or should we go back to the same old bulls***?

Thats basically what we've been trying to tell you all along. This offense isnt going to be the same old Tech offense like you've been preaching to anyone who'd listen.

Hell, Brown's installing designed QB draws/keepers for ph*ks sake. I know you dont want anything to change, but that doesnt really matter.

quote:

---

Thats basically what we've been trying to tell you all along

---

did you type this with a straight face?

The offense is going to change. I have never thought it was going to be good ol' SEC i-formation football, but it will change...and it will regress...it will not be as sharp or as crisp since the mad butt-pirate sailed. They will be running draws on 3rd & 4 from their own 30. Potts and Sticks will get killed.

quote:

---

Doesn't surprise me one bit that VM disregarded the rest of my post in attempt to win laugh/cry points with Sam.

So f***ing pathetic

---

quote:

---

Since I posted that we've watched Brown bring a version of the qb keeper here, so I figure he'll run about 3-5 of those per game

---

quote:

---

think the RB's will end up averaging about 23 carries per game,

---

Since it looks like you really believe that you will run ~4 designed QB runs per game I'd just like to let you know that you guys are ****ed. Your QBs couldn't stay healthy last year in Leach's offense. You have a guy named Sticks, how much does he even weigh? 165 -170?

Medico, can you please tell me how to earn cry/laugh points with you buddy? Thanks.

quote:

---

Medico, can you please tell me how to earn cry/laugh points with you buddy? Thanks

---

its easy, bra. when you see me disagree with something someone says, put my post in quotation marks and laugh/cry, no matter how stupid my post is.

[This message has been edited by Hunt Texas (edited 5/4/2010 10:03a).]

quote:

---

its easy, bra. when you see me disagree with something someone says, put my post in quotation marks and laugh/cry, no matter how stupid my post is.

---

That GETS me points? Interesting. I believe I can do that.

how many threads have been called poor ****ing doc?

I take at least 13...