A&M: 4th, 11-5, 24-10, 2nd round exit to Purdue.

UT: 6th, 9-7, 24-10, 1st Round exit to Wake Forest.

Split the head to head.

Marginally better.

Considering the way basketball went just call tu #1 in the nation and then watch A&M be the only team that goes to OMAHA

quote:

---

Since when is basketball more of a college sport than basketball?

---

lol wut?

quote:

---

MidnightBevo
posted 11:52p, 04/12/10



A&M: 4th, 11-5, 24-10, 2nd round exit to Purdue.

UT: 6th, 9-7, 24-10, 1st Round exit to Wake Forest.

Split the head to head.

Marginally better.

---

Yall have an incredible ability to pick out one aspect that remotely supports your argument, and ignore everything else.

Last year, yall told us it was incredulous to think that the teams were about even when both teams exited in the 2nd round and finished tied in the Big 12 standings.

Yall won a squeaker with some shady calls in austin, a game in which you never led in regulation, then got your annual skull ****ing in CS.

Yall finished 2 games behind us in the Big 12 standings.

Yall got bounced in the first round by a 9 seed that hadn't won a game since Feb, compared to losing in the 2nd round to a 4 seed.

We finished ranked, you didn't.

Nothing marginal about it.

[This message has been edited by Aggies98tards54 (edited 4/13/2010 7:48a).]

Ouch....truth hurts, midnight.

tu was only marginally better than us in football. We both lost a bowl game and we almost beat the sips.

Based on your arguments, you'll easily concede that Tech was better than A&M in football last year. TIA.

the truth is that basketball season is over, neither team did anything of note, split the series, yet the poor aggies want to say they were "better" than texas. congratulations aggies on a marginally better season than ours.

quote:

---

Yall have an incredible ability to pick out one aspect that remotely supports your argument, and ignore everything else.

---

you mean like you coming on here in full blimpmode about basketball on a baseball thread? poor aggies. so starved for relevance in a major sports. "look at us! we split with tu!"

Owned.

Speaking of being ranked......

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/college/top-25/2010/269804.html

Rk. Team W-L Last Week Prev.
1. UCLA 25-3 2-2 3
2. Virginia 27-7 4-1 4
3. Arizona State 28-3 3-2 1
4. Texas 26-7 5-0 6
5. Georgia Tech 27-5 2-2 2
6. Florida State 25-7 4-1 7
7. Florida 23-8 3-1 8
8. Louisiana State 26-6 3-2 5
9. Arkansas 26-6 4-0 10
10. South Carolina 25-7 3-1 11
11. Texas Christian 23-7 3-1 12
12. Coastal Carolina 27-5 4-0 13
13. Louisville 25-6 1-3 9
14. Mississippi 23-10 2-2 15
15. Miami 23-9 3-2 14
16. Oklahoma 25-7 3-1 19
17. Clemson 23-10 3-2 16
18. Oregon State 20-8 2-2 17
19. Western Kentucky 26-8 4-1 21
20. Virginia Tech 23-11 3-1 25
21. California 20-10 4-0 NR
22. Cal State Fullerton 18-12 3-1 NR
23. Auburn 22-11 4-1 NR
24. Arizona 22-9 2-1 NR
25. Connecticut 22-7 6-0

NR
Dropped Out: UC Irvine (18), Vanderbilt (20), Stanford (22), Texas A&M (23), Alabama (24)


A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx

quote:

---

yet the poor aggies want to say they were "better" than texas

---

I like how you put better in quotes. If you honestly think that we weren't better than you in basketball this year, you need to head to the eye doctor immediately because you obviously cannot see.

The truth is that football season is over, neither team won a bowl game, yet the poor teasips want to say they were "better" than Texas A&M. congratulations teasips on a marginally better season than ours.

Texas won the conference and played for the National Championship

We are not supposed to talk to you Highwayman.

I sent the club a wire stating, Please accept my resignation. I don't care to belong to any club that will have me as a member.
GM

Reminding all that this is a baseball thread. Comprehension down?

Reminding you that you are a t-shirt horn posting on an Aggie board. We make the rules around here, pendejo.

OOOOH Rev Sammy and Herr Puppy have spoken!

I guess that's as close as they will ever come to saying "It's Good to Be the King".


I sent the club a wire stating, Please accept my resignation. I don't care to belong to any club that will have me as a member.
GM

i think the aggies have had a better year than UT in the big 3 maybe 3-4 times in the last 10 years, this year's basketball team being one of them.

these occur NOT when A&M has a good year, they occur when Texas has a bad year. so, congratulations on splitting head-to-head, winning one game in the NCAA and finishing ranked #25. that's a bad year for UT.

Just off the top of my head....

Texas A&M was better in baseball in 2007, 2008

Basketball 2007, 2010

A case could be made for football in 2006

So, recently, it's not an anomaly.

quote:

---

TTPointMan
posted 8:15a, 04/13/10



Based on your arguments, you'll easily concede that Tech was better than A&M in football last year. TIA.

---

In none of my arguments am I trying to say we were better than a team that fisted us in our own house.

quote:

---

Texas A&M was better in baseball in 2007, 2008

---

Incidentally, Texas swept Texas A&M in baseball both of those years. Aggies did win 7-3 over Texas in the tourney championship game in 2007. Although Texas was outright season champs.

^ HAHAHAHAHAHA

This is rich. You wrote of Texas...

quote:

---

Yall have an incredible ability to pick out one aspect that remotely supports your argument, and ignore everything else.

Last year, yall told us it was incredulous to think that the teams were about even when both teams exited in the 2nd round and finished tied in the Big 12 standings.

Yall won a squeaker with some shady calls in austin, a game in which you never led in regulation, then got your annual skull ****ing in CS.

Yall finished 2 games behind us in the Big 12 standings.

Yall got bounced in the first round by a 9 seed that hadn't won a game since Feb, compared to losing in the 2nd round to a 4 seed.

We finished ranked, you didn't.

Nothing marginal about it.

---

... and yet you turn around and will insist A&M was better last year than Tech in football, even when the arguments are basically the same. Tech won its bowl game. Tech had a winning record. Tech beat OU 41-13 when A&M lost to the same team 65-10. So you played Texas a close game. So did Tech -- AT Texas.

Just go ahead and admit that you more than anyone else select one aspect that supports your argument but ignore everything else.

quote:

---

Last year, yall told us it was incredulous to think that the teams were about even when both teams exited in the 2nd round and finished tied in the Big 12 standings.

---

I did not.

quote:

---

Yall won a squeaker with some shady calls in austin, a game in which you never led in regulation, then got your annual skull ****ing in CS.

Yall finished 2 games behind us in the Big 12 standings.

Yall got bounced in the first round by a 9 seed that hadn't won a game since Feb, compared to losing in the 2nd round to a 4 seed.

We finished ranked, you didn't.

---

You were a little better, this year. Everything you just posted supports that. Finished two spots ahead in conference, identical total records, one round farther in the tournament, and ranked 25th. That is marginally better.

quote:

---

tu was only marginally better than us in football. We both lost a bowl game and we almost beat the sips.

---

Even you aren’t that stupid. The difference between our football finishes and our basketball finishes isn’t even close to the same.

quote:

---

The truth is that football season is over, neither team won a bowl game, yet the poor teasips want to say they were "better" than Texas A&M. congratulations teasips on a marginally better season than ours.

---

Won a conference title and played for a national title. Not even close to the same comparison.

quote:

---

Texas A&M was better in baseball in 2007, 2008

---

2007:
UT: 46-17(21-6) 1st place , A&M 48-19(13-13) Tourney Champs. If you had one won game against Rice this would be more convincing, it seems like more of a push for the year to me, but whatever.

2008:
UT: 39-22(15-12) Tourney Champs, A&M: 56-19(19-8) 1st place. Again if you hadn’t got swept by the same Rice team we lost to it would be a stronger case.

Those years were a wash to me.

quote:

---

Basketball 2007, 2010

---

Both marginal, but sure.

quote:

---

A case could be made for football in 2006

---

It really can’t. 10-4(6-2) record, a bowl win, head to head, and a #13 ranking will always be better than 9-5(5-3) record, a bowl loss, a head to head loss, and unranked no matter how you slice it.

But even if you count all those you’re talking about being better 16% of the time over the last decade.

Well Midnight you were right about everything except that we lost to A&M in football in 2006 and you said we didn't. That was the year that "Cart" was originated.

Horns beat Texas State with a 3 run 8th inning, final score 6-5. Ags get shut down in Ft Worth, 6-1 by the Frogs.

K-State can't even take 2/3 from Tech. Who the hell says they can beat UT 2/3??

Lowe,

my mistake.

Tha-red ovah...

Big game Friday, who starts for you guys?

the USS Missouri

the aggies argued a lot in 2007 that the b12 championship was just as important as the regular season in arguing that their baseball team was better. they of course turned that argument around the next year. however - we swept them in the regular season both of those years, although we did lose 1 in the conf. championship to them in 2007.

3-4 times....and it only happens when we have a down year.

you mean, like the Hales shutout in Austin?

I love how when A&M loses it is only because a horrible call. You guys have a lot of bad luck.

The Texas bats sure seem to be avg, but what helps is leading the conference in HR's. Last I checked anyway. They seem to hit pretty well when they get to Omaha though.

*Aggie basketball has been about on par with Texas recently. Horn fans should give it up to aTm for having a pretty good year. They played with alot of heart. Something that for the exception of Damian James, Texas didn't do. From my own observations, the younger guys seemed to be playing for an NBA contract than for each other. Just my opinion.