quote:
Midnight,
Quit trying to paint a picture that Texas is on the same level as USC. They aren't. They've won 6 straight Pac 10 titles, 2 NC's, 11 games every year since 2002, etc. Texas isn't even the best team in their own division. Quit.
Pac-10 and Big 12 are not the same thing. They have 1 NC(Everyone agreed to the BCS, claiming the AP when it didn’t break your way is BS). We’ve won no less than 10 games in that same time frame and beat USC for a national title. Since Mack got here we have the 2nd highest winning percentage (Boise St. is 1st) and 103 wins. USC has the 8th highest and 95 wins. Since Carroll arrived Boise St./UT/USC share the top winning percentage and number of wins. Coaches Rankings since 2001 UT: 5, 7, 11, 4, 1, 13, 10 Avg:7.28; USC: NR, 4, 2, 1, 2, 4, 2, 2 Avg.(generously using 26 for NR)6.14. AP Rankings since 2001 UT: 5, 6, 12, 5, 1, 13, 10 Avg:7.42; USC: NR, 4, 1, 1, 2, 4, 3, 3 Avg.(generously using 26 for NR)6.28. Same winning percentage, same number of BCS titles. Close rankings. The only difference is conference titles and no one in the country would put the Pac-10 at the same level as the Big 12. But your right we’re not anywhere close.
quote:
Headline of the article: "The Most Valuable College Football Teams." The rankings had ND at the top. If you have a problem with that, take it up with whoever wrote it.
Pulling that sentence out of the article, by the way, is a great example of that "selective quoting" thing I referred to earlier. There's your example.
And the OP clearly said “most profitable” which the article said is Texas. It’s not selective quoting. The OP was referencing the information about profit.
quote:
As for your responses, you can whine and demand responses all day. I don't care. You write stupid stuff, and a lot of it.
Not whining or demanding. Just wondering if you have an actual response to anything I said or your just going to complain that it is too long for you read and comprehend all at one time.
quote:
By the way, this is my thread now. Get the hell off of it and stay off, dumbasses.
Okay tough guy. Whatever you say. You have made no substantive post on this thread just complained that my posts are too long. Way to go, you’ve owned this thread.
quote:
Scoreboard.
We have that on USC. Thanks.
quote:
deflect the utter defeat of the OP's original purpose.
OP claimed superiority as most profitable. We are in fact the most prfotable.
quote:
AHOV is putting on a ass kicking clinic in this thread
He hasn’t refuted one thing. At best he has pointed out that my posts are long. Two thumbs up!
quote:
tu still isn't the king of anything.
We are the king of profit which was the OP’s point.
quote:
Actually, that's the point - their lack of a point. Map this thread and a cartographer would beat your ass. They're all over the place
Original point was that UT is the king of profit. We are. Aggies tried various methods to downplay that(t-shirt fans buying stuff is bad, biggest school in big state). All of which is moronic. Aggie tries to claim UT is nowhere near USC as a program. All measurable indicators prove otherwise. Neither pre 1998 or pre 1970 have much to do with the current state of the programs. Is that easy enough to follow?
quote:
A sheety A&M team beat tu last year.
tu is not the king of anything.
The only thing the OP claimed we are the king of is profit. Which we are.
quote:
Back to OP:
tu isn't the most valuable college football team. hth.
p-r-o-f-i-t-a-b-l-e.
quote:
2. For both, 2 games above .500 over their last 4 years is why they were fired. It isn't good enough. Is that registering with you, you old bag?
BLK, that was the point. Fran didn’t drive it into the ground, RC did. Fran just didn’t dig it out.
A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.
Socialism is a dangerous drug. Just Say NObama.[This message has been edited by MidnightBevo (edited 8/19/2008 5:35p).]
