Yikes.
cash out with penalty and taxes???? That's about as dumb as it gets.AgCPA95 said:62strat said:Like caliber said, when people leave a job, they generally roll the old 401(k) into an IRA.Quote:
The median 401(k) balance is just $35,345.
That means half of account balances are lower than this amount and half are higher. And since averages can be skewed by a few outliers, the median account balance is considered to be more representative of what most people actually have saved in their 401(k) accounts.
I don't know that this stat really tells a true picture.
For reference, I have $1m net worth at 42, and my 401(k) balance is $0, because I don't have a current one. My wife is pension, and my current employer gives 15% profit sharing into self directed retirement account that isn't a 401(k).
My 401(k) from my 20s I had for about 5 years before leaving, I rolled it over into IRA. It was roughly $30k when I left, it's over $100k now.
On rolling 401ks to IRAs when leaving jobs my money conversations with coworkers and others is that is seems like a lot of people cashed them out. Would be interesting to see % of cash outs.
ChoppinDs40 said:
People see that pile of cash and just think "BOAT BOAT BOAT CAR CAR CAR PURSE SHOES DISNEY CRUISE"
topher06 said:Startling and scary. You know those people will expect a handout when it comes time for consequences for irresponsible decision making (I realize some are forced to save little to nothing, but many are just irresponsible).YouBet said:LostInLA07 said:
Just curious if you know how many Americans have access to 401k accounts. I doubt it changes the stats much but there are probably some number of Americans using other retirement saving vehicles (perhaps IRAs or just taxable brokerage accounts)?
The other analysis out there is done by the federal government and it's not much better. Median retirement savings is $80-85k. I think that one includes sources beyond 401k which is why it's a little higher.
These numbers don't surprise me at all. Another startling figure is that 50% of people have literally 0 in retirement.
A million would be pretty large in a single 401k, in my opinion. Doable when you're older, but have to imagine that would take 15-25 years at a single job in most situations.gindaloon said:
At the end of Q2 2022 Fidelity had 35 million 401k, IRA, and 403b accounts. 578,900 had 1.0mil or more.
he said 401k, ira and 403b.topher06 said:A million would be pretty large in a single 401k, in my opinion. Doable when you're older, but have to imagine that would take 15-25 years at a single job in most situations.gindaloon said:
At the end of Q2 2022 Fidelity had 35 million 401k, IRA, and 403b accounts. 578,900 had 1.0mil or more.
plus a probably 30-50% loss since this spring!chrisfield said:
So just 1 out of 70 (1.4%) had over million in retirement? After one of the greatest bull markets in history?
AgCPA95 said:62strat said:Like caliber said, when people leave a job, they generally roll the old 401(k) into an IRA.Quote:
The median 401(k) balance is just $35,345.
That means half of account balances are lower than this amount and half are higher. And since averages can be skewed by a few outliers, the median account balance is considered to be more representative of what most people actually have saved in their 401(k) accounts.
I don't know that this stat really tells a true picture.
For reference, I have $1m net worth at 42, and my 401(k) balance is $0, because I don't have a current one. My wife is pension, and my current employer gives 15% profit sharing into self directed retirement account that isn't a 401(k).
My 401(k) from my 20s I had for about 5 years before leaving, I rolled it over into IRA. It was roughly $30k when I left, it's over $100k now.
On rolling 401ks to IRAs when leaving jobs my money conversations with coworkers and others is that is seems like a lot of people cashed them out. Would be interesting to see % of cash outs.
As mentioned above it just takes time given how relatively low the contribution limit is. When I started in the late 90s the max was around $10K and there were stricter limits on the amount you could contribute (I think it was 16% where as now it is 50% per paycheck); it has almost doubled since then but even with a relatively strong market the past 20 years it took me over 15 to reach $1MM while maxing out most years and getting matched with a pretty good salary.chrisfield said:
So just 1 out of 70 (1.4%) had over million in retirement? After one of the greatest bull markets in history?
Or, a guy involved with Nascar somehow.Charismatic Megafauna said:
Dusty is a stripper. Almost always.
YouBet said:
The bottom line is that regardless of the retirement numbers we post they are catastrophically low no matter what source you can find.
Those of us above median and above average will be footing the bill for everyone else, eventually.
Yep, most people do not want to work hard because they don't have to. We've created a minimal standard of living in this country that is almost fully funded by the government if you don't mind living in relative squalor and just get by with internet and tv.Sea Speed said:YouBet said:
The bottom line is that regardless of the retirement numbers we post they are catastrophically low no matter what source you can find.
Those of us above median and above average will be footing the bill for everyone else, eventually.
While I was in college, I waited tables at a decently middle high end chain. It was always meant to be a temporary job. The bartender and I didn't get along at all. No biggie. One day, while she was upset with me she said "I was here before you and I will be here after you." as if this was some sort of insult.
Point being is there are millions and millions of people who don't even think about the long term future and people like those on this thread will absolutely be footing thst bill, as you say. I may have been naive and thought most people wanted more, but thst simple line from her made me realized that they don't. I honestly felt sorry for her immediately and also made me realize how screwed we are as a country.
Federal income tax. Still TONS of other taxes that *everyone* pays (payroll, property, state fees, fuel, etc). But I 100% agree with you that the federal income being carried by a minority of the population is really big issue.Quote:
And it's only going to get worse when almost 60% of the population pays nothing in taxes. Pretty frightening.
Electric car owners don't pay their fair share in fuel/road taxes, and pretty soon an electric car will become an entitlement.Ol Jock 99 said:Federal income tax. Still TONS of other taxes that *everyone* pays (payroll, property, state fees, fuel, etc). But I 100% agree with you that the federal income being carried by a minority of the population is really big issue.Quote:
And it's only going to get worse when almost 60% of the population pays nothing in taxes. Pretty frightening.
Bloomberg tried that when he was mayor and was shot down because its basically a middle class tax hike. Well, I guess they solved that by adding some tax credits to certain residentsgindaloon said:
Well this is coming to NYC
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/11/manhattan-congestion-pricing-charge-transportation
Quote:
Residents of the congestion area making less than $60,000 a year will be eligible for a tax credit to make up for the cost of the tolls
tysker said:Bloomberg tried that when he was mayor and was shot down because its basically a middle class tax hike. Well, I guess they solved that by adding some tax credits to certain residentsgindaloon said:
Well this is coming to NYC
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/11/manhattan-congestion-pricing-charge-transportationQuote:
Residents of the congestion area making less than $60,000 a year will be eligible for a tax credit to make up for the cost of the tolls