JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:
ORAggieFan said:
62strat said:
yeh it's kinda dumb to say if you can't afford $20k a year in retirement, then you can't retire..
My father in law has been retired for ~5-6 years, and his budget is literally probably $20k a year. If medicare was 60, he probably would have retired then!
I said you can't afford early retirement. Please explain how one can retire if they don't have the ability to afford healthcare?
I mean, the whole point was that people were saying they would retire early, except they can't afford to cover healthcare, to which you responded it was a paltry $2k/month as if it was no big deal.
I think that is exactly their point - that money isn't "nothing" to them or their retirement projections, so they've had to adjust their timelines.
My point is, it's not going to stop you from retiring early. Maybe you work 2-3 more years to offset it, you still retire early.
I just don't think many are looking to retire at 50 to then live off $100k or less, minus the FIRE people. Most would rather work a few more years to grow their wealth and lifestyle.
If one is debating retirement at 62 or 65 and has very little saved, yeah, it's a huge deal. That isn't what we were discussing though.
If you're going to be reliant in any way in Medicare or SS, you shouldn't retire early.