Going to lump all of my responses into one post.
Yes, I was completely opposed to bringing Carter up
when it was first mentioned on this forum, which started pretty early in the season. I was still concerned about it when he finally did get the call, but he did so well initially it was a moot point.
Comparing Langford to Carter is apples & oranges, because Carter was drafted straight out of HS - where he missed the entirety of his senior season because of covid cancellations - and Langford played in college, which is not terribly different from the lower minor leagues. Counting college, Langford as already had aroudn 200 more ABs than Carter. Also, Carter never put up the stats that Langford did offensively. It was obvious that Langford was ready (.333 at Hickory, .405 at Frisco and .368 at Round Rock). Carter's stats, though good, weren't nearly as stout (played the majority of the season at AA, hit .284 there and then got hot at the end of the season briefly in AAA and then with the Rangers).
I agree that calling Carter up
at the end of the season was the right thing to do, and helped get the Rangers a WS championship. But those conversations started on here much, much earlier and I was against it at that time. Frankly, IMO you sort of lose the right to complain about the Rangers not developing players when you don't allow them the time to develop.
I would gently remind everyone how so many were clamoring to bring Justin Foscue up last season, and we saw how that worked out. Langford is a generational talent, he's the exception, and he struggled early on.
I really like Carter and I hope he can figure it out and get back up to the majors sooner rather than later. Time will tell.
Jimbo Franchione