BMX Bandit said:
Quote:
As much as I love the Astros, they are not worth the $30/month
To each his own; but April to mid-August, Astros are 90% of tv consumption for my family. Worth much more than $30/month for us.
I gotcha and I understand. Certainly paying $30/month to watch 24ish games is much more economical than going to a single game with the family. It's why I did it for so long.
I'm just fed up with it all.
The NFL has figured how to give me games for my local team on Sunday for free if I want to go that route. The prime subscription makes it easy, and YTTV gives me ESPN. They don't force me to pay an additional fee for 95% of games. The NFL is certainly a different beast than MLB, no denying that.
The NBA, even though I can't watch my local team every night, gives me games on Tuesdays and Thursdays through YTTV (TNT) and a Sunday game for free (ABC). Maybe two Sunday games. I have to pay an extra fee to watch my local team through the RSN, but I can still watch a good amount of basketball weekly with no extra RSN fees on top.
The MLB - all of it is extra fees. Sunday night is the only night baseball is even available without any extra fees. I categorize Apple separately because it's usually only one game or so. Maybe two.
So, also not paying the additional $30/month, or the RSN fee, is my way of telling the MLB they suck. The freaking NBA can get more games on TV without additional fees than MLB. That should wake MLB the hell up, but it doesn't since we keep paying the RSN fee. They owners and commissioner with their regional only view of baseball is going to kill the game.