***Official Houston Astros 2023-24 Offseason Thread*** [Staff Warning - OP]

1,001,208 Views | 11245 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by Lonestar_Ag09
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mAgnoliAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All I do is Nguyen said:



Wanted him at the deadline. H town native and we could use some more gas
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All I do is Nguyen said:




That's somebody I was hoping we'd trade for last deadline
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not overspending on the BP and interested in Hicks don't really add up.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

Not overspending on the BP and interested in Hicks don't really add up.


Hicks is only 27. So it's a better investment than somebody like Montero was
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

Not overspending on the BP and interested in Hicks don't really add up.


Only if he sucks or we give him 5/70.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting article on Hicks. I could go either way on him. Depends on how much additional juice we think our nerds can squeeze out of him.

At a high level, if we're going to give out big $$ to a reliever, my inclination is to give it to someone who's nasty and has some margin for error to cover for some inconsistency as opposed to a "coming off career year" guy who has solid stuff but needs to be on to be effective (ie Montero, Will Harris types).

Is Hicks that guy? I'm not sure.

https://baseballcloud.blog/2022/08/29/the-jordan-hicks-dilemma-a-quantitative-analysis-of-pitch-tunneling-arsenal-coherence-and-stuff-based-evaluation/

Quote:

To exemplify my point about wiffle-ball-esque pitches, I will point to a pitcher whose stuff on paper appears to be fresh out of a video game. Jordan Hicks of the St. Louis Cardinals might possess the single-most nasty two-pitch mix in MLB history. He is known for having touched 105mph on his sinker. That sinker runs 16 inches, and his slider sweeps 12 inches. A 28-inch horizontal movement differential combined with historical velocity must make Hicks unhittable. Right?

Somehow, the results don't seem to agree. This is Hicks' second straight season with an ERA above 5.00. He only strikes out 23% of hitters while walking 16%. Ah! There it is! Hicks must be another example of a flame-thrower with generational stuff who is plagued by an inability to throw strikes. Except… he's not. This season, Hicks has thrown 42% of his pitches in the strike zone. Out of 587 pitchers who have thrown at least 10 innings in 2022, Hicks ranks 270th in zone rate. His ability to throw strikes is quite literally average. How does a pitcher with an average zone rate have a walk rate that ranks in the 1st percentile? The answer is simple. Jordan Hicks cannot generate strikes on pitches out of the strike zone.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Basically he's uncompetitive on pitches out of the zone.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Basically he's uncompetitive on pitches out of the zone.

That's a good summary
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does anyone here actually pay for the athletic?

Here are the "best parts".
Quote:

"Most teams understand that we're not moving Bregman," Brown said from the Astros' suite at the Opryland Hotel. "I don't know where this whole Bregman rush is coming from, but it's certainly not coming from us because we need Bregman. He's a pillar for this club. So, no, we're not entertaining trading Bregman at all."

...

Bregman will be the highest-paid member of a team that has little financial flexibility, a poor farm system and no precedent for issuing the sort of contract he will command next winter. If Houston does lose him, the team risks receiving nothing but a draft pick as compensation. And, if the Astros exceed the competitive balance tax in 2024, that selection wouldn't arrive until after the fourth round.

....

Doing all three while staying under the first, $237 million luxury tax threshold continues to feel far-fetched. Cot's Contracts approximates the Astros' CBT payroll at $235,168,810. After acknowledging in November the team had "not a ton" of financial flexibility, Brown softened his stance somewhat Monday.

...

Crane has exceeded the competitive balance tax once during his ownership tenure, but not since 2020. Asked Monday whether Crane had given him authority to cross it this winter, Brown replied, "We haven't had that discussion yet, but I'm sure at some point we will. But I do understand that this guy is competitive. He wants to win. And so, we'll have that talk a little bit later."

It is difficult to believe an owner and his head of baseball operations have not discussed an operating budget by Dec. 4, so perhaps Brown was being purposely coy. It is important to note, too, that the competitive balance tax is not calculated until the season's end. So, even if the Astros exceed it this winter, they could maneuver under it during the season if Crane wishes.

...

Brown seemed content to wait out the market in the hope prices drop, but acknowledged, "I'm not interested in overpaying in the reliever market" a mistake his boss, Crane, made last winter with Montero. [Chandler shooting arrows at Crane]

The team is showing interest in free-agent flamethrower and Houston native Jordan Hicks, a person with knowledge of the situation said Monday, and Brown said the team has engaged with Neris' representation about a possible reunion. Ronel Blanco, Seth Martinez and former top prospect Forrest Whitley were all mentioned as internal options if the market proves too costly.

...

"You always have to entertain trading a major leaguer for a major leaguer. Sometimes you get a deal where it's a win-win," Brown said. "You may have a surplus in one area and they may have a need and then they have a surplus in the area where you have a need and then you can make that deal. We haven't gotten down that road yet, but if that option opens, if we think that we have a surplus then, well, we'll make a trade."

Depth starter Brandon Bielak is the only young rotation player who will enter 2024 without minor-league options, but trading him would do little for Houston's financial flexibility. Ditto for J.P. France, who could be ticketed for the minor leagues if Luis Garcia and Lance McCullers Jr. return in July.

If paring the payroll is a goal, trading Jos Urquidy (estimated to make $3.5 million in arbitration) or Framber Valdez (estimated to net $12.1 million) would be more prudent moves.


Glad we can move on from any Bregman trade talk. I think Framber & Tucker should be in the same spot. They're not getting traded. Urquidy seems like the most obvious trade piece. Bielak too if we trust Gordon & Arighetti. Those 2 should be able to fetch a bullpen arm with more than 1 year of control. After that, Jake might be an option, but I don't see it without adding another OFer or fully believing in a prospect (Melton, Corona, Loperfido are all about a year away). Between those 3 and Baez (a little younger) that could be your surplus that nets us a semi decent piece.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Letting Bregman and Tucker walk would absolutely suck. I'm not pushing for long extensions or for trades… just saying it would suck. Lose your talent for nothing.
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marvin said:

Letting Bregman and Tucker walk would absolutely suck. I'm not pushing for long extensions or for trades… just saying it would suck. Lose your talent for nothing.
Yea. Our standard operating procedure has typically been to let guys like that walk and replenish the roster from within and via value acquisitions (with some exceptions here and there). My base case for this offseason (until shown otherwise) is we'll probably operate the same way. It's certainly been successful for us in the past.

But tides are changing quickly. It was easier to let Correa/Springer walk when we knew we still had 4+ years of control with Altuve, Bregman, Tucker and Yordan. Now those controllable years have diminished signficantly for everyone but Yordan. I'm sure we'll find a way to keep Altuve but his elite productive years could be winding down.

It's one thing to count on guys like Chas, Diaz and Pena to supplement the lineup. It's another thing to ask them to help carry it. Maybe they'll grow into those roles, maybe not. It remains to be seen.

That doesn't mention pitching and whether any of our young guys (outside of Framber, who's also likely gone in 2 years) can develop into top-of-rotation guys. Javier and McCullers have shown it in stretches, but not consistently and neither appears to be the regular season workhorse that you need from your ace.

All that to say our standard operating procedure might need to be adjusted a little at this juncture. To triangulate a few thoughts from me, you and farmer a few days ago:

1) I tossed out the idea of using 2024 as a "semi-rebuild" year and try to angle for a 2025-27 run with centered around Yordan

2) I also agree with Farmer that any deals that make it less likely to win a 2024 ring are risky. The 2024 season is "bird in the hand". We know we're going to be among the favorites this year and should roll our dice accordingly. "Rebuilds", no matter how big or small, are risky and it likely would not turn out as successfully as our 2020 "rebuild".

3) I also agree with your (Marvin's) point that it would be smart to do something, one way or the other. Either make a big play to win in 2024-2025 at the expense of the future, or do the semi-rebuild. Standard operating procedure carries more risk than at any point during our run.

To me, these roads point to LuBob and we should do what it takes to get him. He kills two huge birds with one stone (I'm really vibing off my bird analogies in this post). He gives us the instant impact boost to a team that wants to win a title in the next two years. He also anchors the lineup with Yordan through 2027.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deluxe said:

Marvin said:

Letting Bregman and Tucker walk would absolutely suck. I'm not pushing for long extensions or for trades… just saying it would suck. Lose your talent for nothing.
1) I tossed out the idea of using 2024 as a "semi-rebuild" year and try to angle for a 2025-27 run with centered around Yordan
Yeah. They're getting ready behind the scenes for a bit of a rebuild after 2024.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texasaggie2015 said:

Deluxe said:

Marvin said:

Letting Bregman and Tucker walk would absolutely suck. I'm not pushing for long extensions or for trades… just saying it would suck. Lose your talent for nothing.
1) I tossed out the idea of using 2024 as a "semi-rebuild" year and try to angle for a 2025-27 run with centered around Yordan
Yeah. They're getting ready behind the scenes for a bit of a rebuild after 2024.
That could work too.

Take our best shot in 2024. We've got the chips so we might as well play them. If we win it all, maybe we consider going for it again in 2025 with the whole band (minus Bregman). House money at that point.

But if not, use 2025 as the semi-rebuild year. Listen to offers for Tucker, Framber and Pressly and focus on re-stocking the lineup around Yordan for 2026-2028.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I tend to think it would be a re-tool as opposed to a rebuild.
Deluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

I tend to think it would be a re-tool as opposed to a rebuild.
Yea I think of it like a semi-rebuild. Like 2020. Def not like 2011-2013 haha.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deluxe said:

Ag_07 said:

I tend to think it would be a re-tool as opposed to a rebuild.
Yea I think of it like a semi-rebuild. Like 2020. Def not like 2011-2013 haha.
Definity hoping it more of a renovation than getting some diesel and lighting a match.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deluxe said:

texasaggie2015 said:

Deluxe said:

Marvin said:

Letting Bregman and Tucker walk would absolutely suck. I'm not pushing for long extensions or for trades… just saying it would suck. Lose your talent for nothing.
1) I tossed out the idea of using 2024 as a "semi-rebuild" year and try to angle for a 2025-27 run with centered around Yordan
Yeah. They're getting ready behind the scenes for a bit of a rebuild after 2024.
That could work too.

Take our best shot in 2024. We've got the chips so we might as well play them. If we win it all, maybe we consider going for it again in 2025 with the whole band (minus Bregman). House money at that point.

But if not, use 2025 as the semi-rebuild year. Listen to offers for Tucker, Framber and Pressly and focus on re-stocking the lineup around Yordan for 2026-2028.


I think 2024-2025 should be years we go for it.

We have Pressly, Tucker & Valdez for 1 more shot. Then reevaluate in 2026.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Deluxe said:

texasaggie2015 said:

Deluxe said:

Marvin said:

Letting Bregman and Tucker walk would absolutely suck. I'm not pushing for long extensions or for trades… just saying it would suck. Lose your talent for nothing.
1) I tossed out the idea of using 2024 as a "semi-rebuild" year and try to angle for a 2025-27 run with centered around Yordan
Yeah. They're getting ready behind the scenes for a bit of a rebuild after 2024.
That could work too.

Take our best shot in 2024. We've got the chips so we might as well play them. If we win it all, maybe we consider going for it again in 2025 with the whole band (minus Bregman). House money at that point.

But if not, use 2025 as the semi-rebuild year. Listen to offers for Tucker, Framber and Pressly and focus on re-stocking the lineup around Yordan for 2026-2028.


I think 2024-2025 should be years we go for it.

We have Pressly, Tucker & Valdez for 1 more shot. Then reevaluate in 2026.
Agree.

If we can sign an average back-up catcher, an average left fielder or even below average D, but above average bat, and one more #1b or #2 starting pitcher, we'd have as good a chance as anyone the next 2 years. Roll whoever is left that were starters this year without a place to the bullpen for middle relief.

Next year would just need an average 1 year rental 3rd baseman or a younger player with long term potential.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Dezenzo can have a big developmental year, maybe we can go Bregman to Dezenzo like we did Correa to Pena.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

If Dezenzo can have a big developmental year, maybe we can go Bregman to Dezenzo like we did Correa to Pena.
That would be nice.
SpaceCityAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It seems as though Dezenzo and Wagner both have incentive to ball out this year and stake their claim as an internal promotion seems more likely a year from now than a splash external acquisition.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wagner made it to triple-A last year. He only played 6 games, but he balled out in those 6. Most of the year was in AA where he was still very good. I think he's probably more projected at 2B, but maybe 3B could work out.
agproducer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought he was projected to not have the arm strength for 3rd.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Wagner made it to triple-A last year. He only played 6 games, but he balled out in those 6. Most of the year was in AA where he was still very good. I think he's probably more projected at 2B, but maybe 3B could work out.
Only real difference between 2nd and 3rd is quickness (hand and feet) for double plays in the middle and arm strength to play third. Used to be 3rd was expected to be a power hitter, but I guess that's not necessarily the case anymore.

If he has the arm strength and is good enough to play second, he could easily transition to third. That was my transition for college.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agproducer said:

I thought he was projected to not have the arm strength for 3rd.
From midzee4


Quote:

Defensively, Wagner could end up as a fringy bat-first regular at third base thanks to a solid arm that can supplement his minor range deficiencies. Second base is in the cards as well, although with the shift restrictions he likely does not fit there as well as he would have previously. While not a butcher defensively, Wagner does not figure to provide surplus value in the field, so he will have to hit to stick.

ts going to be hard to go from Bregman (good to very good defender) to the average guy.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hulla Baller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc said:


The Angels organization must be run by a bunch of monkeys. Trout will get hurt again next season, rinse and repeat.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hulla Baller said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


The Angels organization must be run by a bunch of monkeys. Trout will get hurt again next season, rinse and repeat.

They would have to pay the majority of his contract and get almost nothing in return for him. Plus, I doubt anyone would want him given his frequently he's hurt. That contract is adding like spoiled milk.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:


Least shocking outcome ever
Fightin' Texas Aggie and Sam Houston State Bearkat
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wake me up when Dave Roberts isn't managing them into the ground and out of the first round.

n_touch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:


First Page Last Page
Page 120 of 322
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.