***Official Houston Astros 2023-24 Offseason Thread*** [Staff Warning - OP]

999,267 Views | 11245 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by Lonestar_Ag09
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieJ2002 said:

Regardless of what Pena does the rest of his career, he'll always be a legendary Astro to me for what he did in the 2022 playoffs as a rookie. Hope he can grow from a rough year this past season, and I believe that he will get better this coming season. We don't need him to be an MVP, just having better ABs more consistently than he did last season. It's not a stretch to think that will happen.
this is true

however if the Astros window is going to stay open past 2025...

Pena needs to become an .800 OPS hitter (or close to it)...

and hit in the top 6 of the order
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06 said:

Farmer1906 said:

AgLA06 said:

Farmer1906 said:

Yall are some haters.


I usually agree.

But when you might have just had the worst sophomore slump in recent memory at the plate it doesn't exactly exude confidence that the priority appears to he bicep curls instead of hours of work with a hitting coach to try and be able to recognize a breaking ball.


"The worst sophomore slump in recent memory"??

He went from
102 to 96 wRC+
.300 to .302 xwOBA
.309 to .310 wOBA

He was very similar overall at the plate in 22 as 23. He just did it in a different way. Less power and more on base. It's almost like he worked really hard and figured out how to not chase that breaking ball. His K% 8 Whiff% dropped while his BB% rose.

1 photo on Instagram looking pumped means he's not in the cage? How did everyone draw that conclusion?

You essentially just restated from the highs of 2023 to the lows of 2022 was a catastrophic slump. There was just a bunch of pretty fluff with it to make it sound more elegant. If you have to justify it not being "that bad", it was in fact that bad.

And it fell when we needed him the most and our manager to be thanked later paired him with Maldy to kill a third of our offensive innings each game.
I am not following you at all.

Pena was about average at the plate in 2022 and stayed about average in 2023. Was he slightly worse? Probably, but we're not talking about slump from year 1 to 2.


Quote:

That's heavily skewed by one month. June, July and Sept his OPS+ was well below 100.
True. His Aug was just that good. My point was that even without the HRs in the 2nd half, he was still a productive player.


Quote:


Quote:

Understandable. But there's a the difference between working hard and actual results. I like him as a player / person, but that doesn't get us wins.


I 100% agree with your statement. He may never totally figure there breaking ball out and might not be a whole lot better than 2023 Pena. Doesn't mean he's not trying to figure out the breaking ball.


Pena 100% got better at not chasing and whiffing at breaking stuff from year 1 to year 2. His problem was that he didn't punish mistakes and dominate 4 seamers like he did as a rookie. His run value on 4 seamers went fom +6 to -2. His % of meatballs were slightly up 6.5% to 6.9% yet his swings on those pitches were down from 83.1% to 79.2%.


Quote:

I think he'll be better than 2023, but I don't expect much but league SS average or just below league SS average. Honestly, until he can recognize the fastball in the low and away location faster, he's going to rarely be in control of his ABs.

Even though there are a handful of really good SSs, it's still a weaker hitting position overall. I believe only catcher is worse.

League Avg SS
.249 BA
.311 OBP
.401 SLG
.712 OPS
94 wRC+

Offensively, Pena is already at just above league avg SS. Add in his very good defense and solid base running and he's an above-average SS overall. Avd his WAR agrees with that assessment.

WAR ('22-'23)
1. Lindor - 12.5 WAR
2. Swanson - 11.4 WAR
3. Bogaers - 10.7 WAR
4. Seager - 10.5 WAR
5. Turner - 10.2 WAR
6. Bichette - 8.3 WAR
...
11. Pena - 6.2 WAR
12. Correa - 5.4 WAR
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So of the 4 team needs in the OP. We've addressed 1 of them. Backup catcher
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tjack16 said:

So of the 4 team needs in the OP. We've addressed 1 of them. Backup catcher


It's a long winter, boys!
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beat40 said:

tjack16 said:

So of the 4 team needs in the OP. We've addressed 1 of them. Backup catcher


It's a long winter, boys!
Let's be honest, when was the last offseason where all the needs were actually addressed rather than relying on guys from the minors or longshot last chance guys?
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EastCoastAgNc said:

Beat40 said:

tjack16 said:

So of the 4 team needs in the OP. We've addressed 1 of them. Backup catcher


It's a long winter, boys!
Let's be honest, when was the last offseason where all the needs were actually addressed rather than relying on guys from the minors or longshot last chance guys?


I mean, the Astros did address areas of need just last offseason. Now, it didn't work out well, but they did!
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2022-23

We signed the biggest name FA we could at first base & extended two of our best two free agents.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

2022-23

We signed the biggest name FA we could at first base & extended two of our best two free agents.


They have also gone out and made some pretty big moves during the trade deadline.

Other that that, the Astros only rely on their farm system and scrap heap signings.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm just saying in MLB the show I traded for Dylan Cease and Paul Goldschmidt. Signed Josh Hader. Plus I extended Bregman and Tucker through 2028 … it's possible
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cc10106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gonna be seeing that guy in a lot more than just New Balance "we got now" commercials I think.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's some serious BS and if the league had any balls they would bend the Dodgers over the financial rail.
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

That's some serious BS and if the league had any balls they would bend the Dodgers over the financial rail.
Yep. It's deals like this that end up blowing up collective bargaining negotiations. Other owners are going to be focused on removing that deferral loophole.
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Am I the only one confused as hell by "deferrals"? I understand it lowers the CBT, but when the hell is it being deferred to? I mean they'll pay it at some point, does it not go against the CBT then?
shiphunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LA Private wealth managers salivating at the opportunity to monetize that contract for a fee
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
htxag09 said:

Am I the only one confused as hell by "deferrals"? I understand it lowers the CBT, but when the hell is it being deferred to? I mean they'll pay it at some point, does it not go against the CBT then?
It's going to be deferred to after the 10 years of the contract, is my understanding (the old Bobby Bonilla deal, but up front).
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So will it be going against their CBT amount when they're paying it in 10+ years even though he's not on the team? Or no, they calculate present and future dollars now so it's calculated and done?
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
htxag09 said:

Am I the only one confused as hell by "deferrals"? I understand it lowers the CBT, but when the hell is it being deferred to? I mean they'll pay it at some point, does it not go against the CBT then?
They Bobby Bonilla'ed the contract to lower the AAV so that the Dodgers still have money now and stay lower on the CBT levels.
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess Ohtani cares about winning a ton, but only making $20 million total over the next 10 years, then making $680 the ten years after that sure is leaving a lot to the market and Fed.

It's not like he'll be struggling with the types of endorsements I'm sure he has, but the present value of that money makes that $700 million not look as huge.

All the while the Dodgers start raking in more cash now to have the money to pay later anyway.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ok Jim Crane. Defer the **** outta Bregman and Tucker right now. Before they close that massive loophole.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So how much of that $700MM is interest and how much is that actual salary?
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here is how I see it. Someone on talking baseball said something similar.

Ohtani is a 450 M player. The Ohtani world brand is worth 150 M. Then the fact he's willing to take it at the end is probably worth 100 M. That's how it ends up being worth 700 M when everyone was thinking 500-600.

The fact Ohtani is doing this basically means the Dodgers get an extra 20 M in tax space no one else does.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wonder if the other owners are calling Big Rob and asking him to void the contract.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm guessing he makes so much from endorsements that he's fine with a smaller salary.

I'd imagine he makes the most of any player endorsement wise
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

I'm guessing he makes so much from endorsements that he's fine with a smaller salary.

I'd imagine he makes the most of any player endorsement wise


He makes 40. The next closest makes like 2-4.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:




Okay so maybe this wasn't so far off…
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

So how much of that $700MM is interest and how much is that actual salary?
Aren't you the math guy?

But as far as cash flow to Ohtani, this deal at a 6.5% rate is equivalent to a 10/382.5 deal. Assuming a 5% rate and it's closer to a 10/437.5 deal. Not perfect because I don't have time to model weekly or monthly payments over that time, but the delay in salary is substantial.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New idea.

Give Tucker 10 years 500, but defer 450 of it
tremble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's total bull***** MLB better step in or you're going to have a lot of folks asking why they even bother.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dodgers are probably going to get Yamamoto now.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Buck Compton said:

Mathguy64 said:

So how much of that $700MM is interest and how much is that actual salary?
Aren't you the math guy?

But as far as cash flow to Ohtani, this deal at a 6.5% rate is equivalent to a 10/382.5 deal. Assuming a 5% rate and it's closer to a 10/437.5 deal. Not perfect because I don't have time to model weekly or monthly payments over that time, but the delay in salary is substantial.


If he's taking 5% in today's world he's an idiot. Hell the Dodgers might actually come out ahead. You can get 4+ in CDs.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
this is an interesting caveat on the deferral.
First Page Last Page
Page 133 of 322
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.