The Astros Edge: Triumph and Scandal in Major League Baseball | FRONTLINE

1,817 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by kb2001
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Full Documentary
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
**** PBS!!!
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very fair analysis in my opinion. What sticks out to me is the sign stealing was player based and no players were punished. As an old school purist, I don't know how to defend that decision other than to say I'm glad it wasn't me to have to make that call. I do think last year's title was "pure", as well as the one we'll pick up in a few weeks.
Keeper of The Spirits
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We can summarize the rest of this thread

It stopped in Sept 2017, didn't occur on the road, in playoffs or after,the yankees, Red sox, dodgers and Rangers and 5 other team have all been similarly implicated in similar schemes, only occurred on less than 15% of pitches and very rarely if ever to Altuve (but apparently it's still ok to head hunt him)

If they hadnt beat the leagues favorite pets the Red Sox, Yankees and dodgers this would not be an issue and most teams would be running hacking operations like the Cardinals
DrZ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The players didnt get punished because they knew were a lot of teams in on this. If the astro players got punished and the other teams didnt lawsuits would take over the game. You cant pick and chose which players go down.
Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrZ said:

The players didnt get punished because they knew were a lot of teams in on this. If the astro players got punished and the other teams didnt lawsuits would take over the game. You cant pick and chose which players go down.
But you can pick and choose which franchises are implicated and which franchises get double secret super serious don't do that letters from MLB for second offenses after being told don't ever do that again…and doing it again
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not a bad documentary. I could have done without the Osuna bit. I guess it was supposed to bolster the rotten culture narrative. That Lunhow and Hinch bore the brunt of it is pretty bad. I didn't know Hinch smashed the monitor as a show of disapproval. Interesting that the AV guy said Hinch thought it was hurting them and not helping them at the time.

I wish they would have tried to demonstrate that the Astros were advantaged statistically at home when using the system. The pitcher at the beginning who got blown up was getting blown up regularly pretty much every time out. To make it seem like the sign stealing did him in was disingenuous
Frok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keeper of The Spirits said:

We can summarize the rest of this thread

It stopped in Sept 2017, didn't occur on the road, in playoffs or after,the yankees, Red sox, dodgers and Rangers and 5 other team have all been similarly implicated in similar schemes, only occurred on less than 15% of pitches and very rarely if ever to Altuve (but apparently it's still ok to head hunt him)

If they hadnt beat the leagues favorite pets the Red Sox, Yankees and dodgers this would not be an issue and most teams would be running hacking operations like the Cardinals


This week Twins fans will boo Altuve and cheer passionately for Correa. Fans don't care if the guy is wearing their jersey.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrZ said:

The players didnt get punished because they knew were a lot of teams in on this. If the astro players got punished and the other teams didnt lawsuits would take over the game. You cant pick and chose which players go down.
The players weren't punished because MLB had to offer immunity to get them to talk. MLBPA would have taken Manfraud to pound town if he had tried to suspend them.
South Platte
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we're all tired of hearing about this. I watched about 10 minutes. I feel bad for the pitcher, but lots of pitchers implode and figure out a way to rebuild their game and come back.
07ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

DrZ said:

The players didnt get punished because they knew were a lot of teams in on this. If the astro players got punished and the other teams didnt lawsuits would take over the game. You cant pick and chose which players go down.
The players weren't punished because MLB had to offer immunity to get them to talk. MLBPA would have taken Manfraud to pound town if he had tried to suspend them.
exactly, the players are unionized and the union made a deal with mlb about immunity in exchange for honest answers
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
don't give AF. not watching
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Lee said:

Not a bad documentary. I could have done without the Osuna bit. I guess it was supposed to bolster the rotten culture narrative. That Lunhow and Hinch bore the brunt of it is pretty bad. I didn't know Hinch smashed the monitor as a show of disapproval. Interesting that the AV guy said Hinch thought it was hurting them and not helping them at the time.

I wish they would have tried to demonstrate that the Astros were advantaged statistically at home when using the system. The pitcher at the beginning who got blown up was getting blown up regularly pretty much every time out. To make it seem like the sign stealing did him in was disingenuous

This "it advantages them at home" argument is so bad. It didn't.

These are their 2017 home and away team splits. They were so much better collectively on the road it's not funny.



If you look at the individual player splits you will see exactly what you see with every team. Some guys are better at home. Some on the road. The only player who seems to have really benefited based on historical year over year data was Marwin Gonzalez. It certainly didn't help Beltran and he invented the scheme. By the end of the year he wasn't contributing.

Yu Darvish had more to do with the Astros winning a WS than any trash can did in getting them to the playoffs. He was tipping so badly every hitter knew what was coming and they took advantage of him. To make it worse the Dodgers made no effort to correct it between game 3 and game 7. Add in Dave Roberts over managing his bullpen and the outcome almost inevitable.
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's why I hoped they would include it in the documentary. I'm not trying to make that argument. Hinch hated it because he thought it was hurting them. I don't know if it was hurting them, but it's not clear that it gained them an advantage.

I want to know stuff like how accurate the system was. Did they always correctly steal the signs? And then for those ABs when the system was being used, the results vs. when it wasn't. I don't think anyone's tried to find that stuff out.
kb2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Very fair analysis in my opinion. What sticks out to me is the sign stealing was player based and no players were punished. As an old school purist, I don't know how to defend that decision other than to say I'm glad it wasn't me to have to make that call. I do think last year's title was "pure", as well as the one we'll pick up in a few weeks.
It was pre-determined. When the commissioner sent out the memo in August of 2017 telling teams to stop using electronics to gain an advantage, they said the punishment for any teams doing so after that time would be directed at the manager and GM. Thus, the punishment was directed at Hinch and Lunhow.

MLB knew this was going on across the league for years, but it was getting bad, and they clamped down on it. Some teams ignored it, the Astros got caught first and took the brunt of the heat for it. Similar to the crackdown on sticky substances, it was getting out of hand and they needed to reel it in.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.