***** Official 2022 Houston Astros Season Thread *****

4,953,150 Views | 83072 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Harry Dunne
PSully97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there a team you would want to play less than the Rays?
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cap-n-jack said:

I haven't paid much attention to the NL. Is there anyone that can challenge LA?
Personally I think the NL is the tougher league this year. So whoever the AL champ ('Stros of course) faces in the WS is going to have their hands full. Would not be all that surprised to see the Mets, Braves or even the Redbirds make the WS.

Note the last time the AL has won the series was in '18 when the BoSox took down the Effin' Dodgers.
Jet Black
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadAggie said:

Stros back into the top AL seed


Yeah, this is dumb as *****
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PSully97 said:

Is there a team you would want to play less than the Rays?
The O's but luckily they'll be on the outside looking in.
BadAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jkag89 said:

BadAggie said:

Stros back into the top AL seed
How sad is it that I knew some idiot would post this. Anytime you win 100+ games in a season you're not backing into anything.


Whatever Nancy
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marvin said:

PSully97 said:

Marvin said:

PSully97 said:

I'm not very excited about the idea of playing a bunch of ALDS day games against these guys.

Did you miss the series in Tampa? These guys are professionals, but they're also playing game 150-whatever and mentally shifting to the playoffs. I wouldn't read anything into it.
Yeah I watched all those games. We pitched well, but we didn't score a ton.

They've got 3 really good starting pitchers plus Kluber, who knows how to get it done in the big moments and has pitched really well for about a month. I'd rather play any of the other possible teams.

I get it, but we know from prior years that any team can get hot and roll through the playoffs. You gotta beat em all sooner or later.
Not really, its not pool play.

1. Mariners
2. Jays
3. Rays

Is my order of preference.
yawny06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cap-n-jack said:

I haven't paid much attention to the NL. Is there anyone that can challenge LA?


Dodgers are clearly the best team in the NL, but I think both the Mets and Braves could beat them.

And due to the way that the bracket sets up, the Dodgers are looking at a potential 100+ win wild card team (NL East runner up) opponent in the NLDS then another 100+ win team (NL East winner) in the NLCS.

ETA: The Cardinals are also going to be a tough out. Mets have DeGrom and Scherzer, to go along with a lights out closer in Diaz. Braves have a solid group of starters and bullpen, can be shaky with Jansen as the closer. Braves also have a deep lineup. Dodgers one weakness is at closer, as they just demoted Kimbrel and will go closer by committee.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadAggie said:

jkag89 said:

BadAggie said:

Stros back into the top AL seed
How sad is it that I knew some idiot would post this. Anytime you win 100+ games in a season you're not backing into anything.


Whatever Nancy
Doubling down on the idiocy I see. Sad.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OK 'Stros!. Nobody makes the last out and end the backing in to the #1 Seed BS!!!
Unemployed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadAggie said:

RealTalk said:

BadAggie said:

Stros back into the top AL seed


What a stupid take. Go away.


Because it's true? Not going anywhere commie


So you think we weren't good enough to win one more game?
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OK, guys. You've convinced me. My preference is to play the Rangers, A's, and Tigers in the playoffs. We can dust off the Pirates or Reds for the trophy.

Better?
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
cap-n-jack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
welp
PSully97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Only if the '98 Yankees aren't available
Jet Black
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jkag89 said:

BadAggie said:

jkag89 said:

BadAggie said:

Stros back into the top AL seed
How sad is it that I knew some idiot would post this. Anytime you win 100+ games in a season you're not backing into anything.


Whatever Nancy
Doubling down on the idiocy I see. Sad.


Same dude that posted this garbage. Thought there was a chance the Astros might lose the #1 seed.

Quote:

Yankees have 3 game series versus Orioles and then 4 games of BP in Arlington remaining. They might not lose another game. Astros have 3 versus Tampa's pitching staff and then 3 versus the Phillies fighting to make the playoffs. Another reason trotting out less than best lineup versus Arizona was stupid.
Jet Black
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jkag89 said:

OK 'Stros!. Nobody makes the last out and end the backing in to the #1 Seed BS!!!


Obviously he doesn't understand what backing in means.
Unemployed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jet Black said:

jkag89 said:

BadAggie said:

jkag89 said:

BadAggie said:

Stros back into the top AL seed
How sad is it that I knew some idiot would post this. Anytime you win 100+ games in a season you're not backing into anything.


Whatever Nancy
Doubling down on the idiocy I see. Sad.


Same dude that posted this garbage. Thought there was a chance the Astros might lose the #1 seed.

Quote:

Yankees have 3 game series versus Orioles and then 4 games of BP in Arlington remaining. They might not lose another game. Astros have 3 versus Tampa's pitching staff and then 3 versus the Phillies fighting to make the playoffs. Another reason trotting out less than best lineup versus Arizona was stupid.



Got 'em.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PSully97 said:

Only if the '98 Yankees aren't available

Planning to catch any of the playoff games at MMP? Let me know- I'm buying if I'm there also.
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:



Is that the real Stan? Brother of the ankle rider?
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
checking in with the National League....

big win for the Braves to pull even with the Mets in the East division. Would love to see the Mets in the wildcard round.

the Phillies (84-72) remain a half-game ahead of the Brewers (84-73) for the last wildcard. Philly has a doubleheader tomorrow.

since the Phillies own the tiebreaker, it's still possible for them to clinch before coming to Houston
Jet Black
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:




That's not the same. Astros and Yankees are both playoff teams and division winners. The angels are a team 16 games under .500. I hate the Yankees but that is dumb imo.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jet Black said:

Farmer1906 said:




That's not the same. Astros and Yankees are both playoff teams and division winners. The angels are a team 16 games under .500. I hate the Yankees but that is dumb imo.


Oh so what's the acceptable bar? Division winning teams only? Can WC teams count? .500?
Jet Black
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

Jet Black said:

Farmer1906 said:




That's not the same. Astros and Yankees are both playoff teams and division winners. The angels are a team 16 games under .500. I hate the Yankees but that is dumb imo.


Oh so what's the acceptable bar? Division winning teams only? Can WC teams count? .500?


It's most valuable player. Angels gonna go 50-112 instead of 70-92 without ohtani? Where are the Yankees without Judge?
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lonestar_Ag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jet Black said:

Retractable roof was a good call
Again, would you rather a dome and artificial turf?
Beau Holder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One positive from the night, signs of life from Yuli.
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


pretty awesome moment for that city... Really awesome call on the HR too
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG












bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


wow
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearkatag15 said:















These are awesome, and what a prisoner of the moment is makes us.
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never mind. Must remember not to post without morning coffee especially after drinking one more beet than I should have the night before.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jet Black said:

jkag89 said:

OK 'Stros!. Nobody makes the last out and end the backing in to the #1 Seed BS!!!


Obviously he doesn't understand what backing in means.
So in your mind no matter the outcome last night's Rays/'Stros game, once the Yankees lost Houston backed into the #1 Seed? IMO an odd take on it but then again I find whole the idea of a team earning a postseason berth or seed by backing into to it a might odd to begin with.
BadAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Astros lose two straight games with their serious Cy Young candidate starters and top AL seed on the line. But everything is ok because Baltimore did their job for them.

Rays had no problem winning at MMP last night.

This team has a tendency to just not show up when it matters. Wouldn't be the first time.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
*yawn*, just five more games until they really count.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The team with 5 straight ALCS appearances, 3 World Series appearances, and 1 ring, doesn't show up when it matters?


Quadruple down on your bad take, my friend.

Take no prisoners!
First Page Last Page
Page 1317 of 2374
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.