Isn't Tanaka the one we scored 8 off of in 1 inning? What's the difference between then & now?
mwm said:
Isn't Tanaka the one we scored 8 off of in 1 inning? What's the difference between then & now?
mazag08 said:
Marwin should be benched for not immediately running there. Dear god.
JABQ04 said:
I almost would have rather started Peacock tonight, so that if we lost they'd face DK and JV in Houston. I feel good about Friday, Saturday though............
Ag_07 said:JABQ04 said:
I almost would have rather started Peacock tonight, so that if we lost they'd face DK and JV in Houston. I feel good about Friday, Saturday though............
Talk about setting a tone?
Hey, how's it going nhayden?nhayden said:
I question whether some people played competitive baseball that post on this board. I am not suggesting that you don't know baseball, I wonder if some of you actually understand it at all. Some of the things that have been posted are about as far away from understanding what you are watching.
HossAg said:Farmer1906 said:Rule#2 said:
If anyone thinks we're winning Game 6 without Verlander tossing a perfect game, they're crazy too.
It's okay to be mad but people that feel the need to post dumb **** like this is annoying.
Why is it dumb? Offense hasn't done anything to show that they'll be able to score enough runs to win without a shutout from Verlander.
Wabs said:Hey, how's it going nhayden?nhayden said:
I question whether some people played competitive baseball that post on this board. I am not suggesting that you don't know baseball, I wonder if some of you actually understand it at all. Some of the things that have been posted are about as far away from understanding what you are watching.
You're good brother. Stay with us through the misery. Hopefully we find our bats or pitching means nothing.nhayden said:Wabs said:Hey, how's it going nhayden?nhayden said:
I question whether some people played competitive baseball that post on this board. I am not suggesting that you don't know baseball, I wonder if some of you actually understand it at all. Some of the things that have been posted are about as far away from understanding what you are watching.
I got to get it in while I can.
TXAG14 said:
Laughing stock of baseball. Fun stuff.
Big Daddy88 said:
I would say this game is over... but it was about 4 innings ago. Didnt want to piss anyone off.
mazag08 said:
I still don't understand how it's home field advantage when both teams winning at home every time can leave the favored team down a game.
mazag08 said:
I still don't understand how it's home field advantage when both teams winning at home every time can leave the favored team down a game.
Yep. U are right. And to think some were hoping that was the only run they would get. Still would have won the game w these cold bats.TXAG14 said:Big Daddy88 said:
I would say this game is over... but it was about 4 innings ago. Didnt want to piss anyone off.
It's was over at 1-0.
mazag08 said:
I still don't understand how it's home field advantage when both teams winning at home every time can leave the favored team down a game.
mathguy86 said:
The amount of idiocy on this thread has finally gotten to me. This kind of series is why you build teams for the long term. Its what we keep telling the Rangers faithful. You build for long term because you want to be in the playoffs over and over again. Because when you get there you just don't know what's going to happen.
**** happens. You get cold. An average team gets hot. The Marlins won two rings doing that. The best team often doesn't win. Hell, the 4th best team in the AL over 162 games looks to be the best team right now. It's just playoff ball.
I'm out. I'll watch the game on my own.
FIFYQuote:
It's just Astros ball.
tjholley17 said:mazag08 said:
I still don't understand how it's home field advantage when both teams winning at home every time can leave the favored team down a game.
If every team won their home games .... the team with Home field wins the series 4-3