quote:
"Well, LeBron took the Cavs to the Finals all by himself..."
And lost. Got swept actually. Yet, people point out LeBron's "unselfishness" as the driver behind that team's success. They got to the Finals the same way Allen Iverson's team got to the Finals - behind the otherworldly play of an all-time great. Yet, Iverson never gets the credit that LeBron gets. People still lump Iverson into the "me-first" only category despite performing better than LeBron did in the Finals. But only LeBron gets the pass.
Very few point to Lebron's unselfishness as the driver behind that team's success; in fact, most uneducated fans of the game criticize his passivity as the reason Cleveland never made it over the top. Lebron gets a pass among more serious fans because he has a demonstrated history of making the right basketball play no matter how much scrutiny that will bring him in the press the next morning. It's why his efficiency and advanced stats blow away gunners like Bryant and Iverson. Kobe's history is exactly the opposite. Neither Iverson in Philly nor Lebron the first time in Cleveland had the roster to beat a WC champion no matter what they did. I don't blame Iverson's style of play for that, but I can't act like Iverson, who had more turnovers, fewer assists, and was more than 6 points worse in TS%, is in Lebron James's league even if he did manage the same points per game. Bryant is closer, but you run into the same issue where Lebron has him beaten or tied by every statistical measure of basketball ability.
What I watched of the Warriors game, Kobe forced a bunch of bad shots early... he can't really get good looks against Thompson or Barnes. In the long run I don't blame him for that given who his team mates are, although the rest of the Lakers starters were shooting well early so that might have been a good opportunity to feed them.