Rudyjax said:
deadbq03 said:
I don't know much history but surely there are better CBs. (Adding the caveat that I love Tim Ream and he was my favorite WC player, but age has clearly caught him now).
From my limited knowledge, I'd take peak-Wolfsburg-form John Brooks in a heartbeat (but as I've said many times in the past, I don't blame Ggg for excluding him anymore… something's clearly happened with him and he's not been the same player for the past 3 years or so).
These debates are always hard. On one hand, any player in any sport who was an absolute stud more than 2 or 3 decades ago would likely struggle in the modern game - if you transplanted them directly in the form they were in at their peak. On the other hand, if you took them as a kid and let them develop with modern advances in training, I think they'd probably rise to the top again because they've got a winner's mentality and raw physical tools.
That's exactly my point. There's a difference between all time team and could they come in their prime and start right now.
That was the question. Not all time team.
The questions aren't that dissimilar.
The staring lineup from the Mexico game:
Turner
Dest
Ream
Richards
A Robinson
Adams
Weah
G Reyna
McKinnie
Pulisic
Wright
Who, from the past, wouldn't start right now?
I think you could find a spot on the field for Pulisic, and maybe Tyler Adams has a narrow edge over Jermaine Jones, but that's about it. In a couple of years, Adams cements his status as the best defensive midfielder, and maybe Dest and Robinson supplant Cherundolo and Beasley, but that's all I got.