mullokmotx said:
The NCAA Tournament expanded to 64 teams in 2001. In those 18 years we have advanced to the second round 18 times, Sweet 16 12 times, Elite 8 6 times and the College Cup 1 time. So every third year we make it to the equivalent of the College World Series in baseball or softball. Is that consistent enough? Seems so to me.
Speaking of toughness, I remember the baylor game in 2013 when Ashlynn Harryman became one of my favorite players when she gave a baylor player a bloody nose during the game after Annie Kunz had gotten knocked into the wall in the first 10 seconds.
I am concerned that it seems that baylor may have passed us. They took advantage of playing at home this year which is something that we did not do last year.
It is encouraging that a high profile player like Taylor Ziemer has decided to transfer here from a program of Virginia's caliber.
I ran across this a few days ago and it really resonates with me. You raise a good point, Kevin. The name we give to a certain format of the tournament matters in how we perceive success. If the baseball team or softball team made the CWS every third year, that would be saluted as a tremendous accomplishment and the program would be labeled as "elite." But in soccer, the "Elite 8" doesn't have near the cachet of the College Cup or "Final Four." So we say the program has "only" been to one Final Four. But it's been to six Elite 8s. That's really, really good.
G's, Phil's, and Lori's teams have made the equivalent of the CWS every third year since the field expanded to 64 teams. That's elite.