Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Michael Lewis - The Blind Side

3,564 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by JohnClark929
Dallas Ag03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting quote from the author of Moneyball in his new book, The Blind Side - It's a good read by the way. What does everyone think about this quote? He is discussing the Egg Bowl between Ole Miss and Miss. State...

"The game served as a proxy for the hoary Mississippi class struggle, between the white folks who wore shirts with collars on them and the white folks who did not. Mississippi State was a land grant college, originally called Mississippi A&M. The desperate contempt Ole Miss football fans felt for Mississippi State was echoed in the feelings of fans of the University of Texas for Texas A&M and fans of the University of Oklahoma for Oklahoma State—formerly known as Oklahoma A&M. These schools were not rivals; they were subordinates. Theirs was not a football team to be beaten but an insurrection to be put down. This notion was most vivid in the Ole Miss imagination: that the state of Mississippi, with the sole exception of the town of Oxford, was once a Great Lake of Rednecks. In recent decades the earth had warmed, and the shores of Great Lake Redneck had receded, so that, strictly speaking, perhaps it should not be described as a lake. But still, the residue was a very large puddle. And the one place in the puddle deep enough to ruin a shiny new pair of tassel loafers was Starkville, Mississippi."



[This message has been edited by Dallas Ag03 (edited 2/19/2007 3:09p).]
OrygunAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is that way all across the US...oregon u has the same high brow disdain for Oregon State (formerly Oregon A&M). The dislike the "U's" have for the Ag schools did not start back in the 60s, but goes much further back, all the way to early 20th century...
FarmerJohn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great book.

Interesting comment. I think it holds some truth in Texas, but in Texas there are other factors. First, the military identity of A&M changed it somewhat. Not so much rich and poor but military and civilian. Also, A&M really has never hurt for money, like other "A&M" schools, so I think that changed it also. Now there is no doubt that Texas is the "haves" and we are the historic "have-nots", but I don't think it is as simple as that. I don't think you can underestimate the effect of the '60s on the relationship between our two schools. That is where I see the biggest discrepency.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rivalries like A&M/tu go beyond sports. Its much more deep seeded than your standard cross state rivalry like OU/tu.
Bone6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
While in all honesty we don't measure quite as highly in most areas as Texas (up to this point), we can't be cast off as simply the 2nd best school in any given state.

Your average A&M student could have had their pick of other top state schools in other states. There are very few top level state schools that have tougher admissions than A&M. Michigan certainly has higher admissions, University of Illinois isn't a piece of cake to get into, Virginia (private), North Carolina, and maybe a few others are harder to get into, but not many
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is UVirginia a private school? Didn't realize that.
Sul_Ross
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Also, A&M really has never hurt for money
Read up on the guy who I have as my moniker.
spencerdhg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UVA is public, but there is a definite "old money" disdain for their Hokie friends down in Blacksburg

[This message has been edited by spencerdhg (edited 2/21/2007 9:11p).]
Dr. Teeth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds an awful lot like the way we talk about Texas Tech.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the sequel should be fascinating


https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38190720/blind-side-subject-michael-oher-alleges-adoption-was-lie-family-took-all-film-proceeds


Quote:

The 14-page petition, filed in Shelby County, Tennessee, probate court, alleges that Sean and Leigh Anne Tuohy, who took Oher into their home as a high school student, never adopted him. Instead, less than three months after Oher turned 18 in 2004, the petition says, the couple tricked him into signing a document making them his conservators, which gave them legal authority to make business deals in his name.

The petition further alleges that the Tuohys used their power as conservators to strike a deal that paid them and their two birth children millions of dollars in royalties from an Oscar-winning film that earned more than $300 million, while Oher got nothing for a story "that would not have existed without him." In the years since, the Tuohys have continued calling the 37-year-old Oher their adopted son and have used that assertion to promote their foundation as well as Leigh Anne Tuohy's work as an author and motivational speake
r.
JohnClark929
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree the sequel will be interesting but doubt it will be as successful. People like believing what they want to believe.

Conservatorships are difficult to setup in Texas to protect against these type of shenanigans.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.