quote:
Yeah......it showed all of last year.
Besides the bowl games... Yes, yes it did.
Reggie lead VY in Passing avg/game, total offense, passing efficiency, and my favorite RM: 14 passing TD's with 4 int's; VY: 12 passing TD's with 11 int's.
Vince's passing stats only look decent because he would throw mostly only short passes in the flat or to the tight end.
Step away from the burnt orange blinders bud.
From the Big XII site...
http://big12sports.collegesports.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2004-2005/confldrs.html#conf.wi2PASSING AVG/GAME Team Cl G Att Cmp Int Pct. Yds TD Avg/G
------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Cumbie, Sonny....... TT SR 12 643 421 18 65.5 4742 32 395.2
2. White, Jason........ OU SR 13 390 255 9 65.4 3205 35 246.5
3. McNeal, Reggie...... TA JR 12 344 200 4 58.1 2791 14 232.6
4. Smith, Brad......... MU JR 11 369 191 11 51.8 2185 17 198.6
5. Klatt, Joel......... CU JR 13 367 216 15 58.9 2398 11 184.5
6. Dailey,Joe.......... NU SO 11 310 153 19 49.4 2025 17 184.1
7. Meyer,Bret.......... IS FR 12 290 149 6 51.4 1926 10 160.5
8. Young,Vince......... UT SO 12 250 148 11 59.2 1849 12 154.1
------------------------------------------------
TOTAL OFFENSE Team Cl G Rush Pass Plays Total Yds/G
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. Cumbie, Sonny....... TT SR 12 -152 4742 694 4590 382.5
2. McNeal, Reggie...... TA JR 12 718 2791 495 3509 292.4
3. Smith, Brad......... MU JR 11 553 2185 534 2738 248.9
4. Young,Vince......... UT SO 12 1079 1849 417 2928 244.0
-------------------------------------
PASS EFFICIENCY Team Cl G Att Cmp Int Pct. Yds TD Eff.
------------------------------------------------------------------
1. White, Jason........ OU SR 13 390 255 9 65.4 3205 35 159.4
2. Woods,Donovan....... OS FR 12 187 97 5 51.9 1628 13 142.6
3. Cumbie, Sonny....... TT SR 12 643 421 18 65.5 4742 32 138.2
4. McNeal, Reggie...... TA JR 12 344 200 4 58.1 2791 14 137.4
5. Young,Vince......... UT SO 12 250 148 11 59.2 1849 12 128.4
---------------------------
PASS OFFENSE G Att Cmp Int Pct. Yds Avg TD Yds/G
------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Texas Tech.......... 12 652 426 18 65.3 4796 7.4 34 399.7
2. Texas A&M........... 12 378 223 4 59.0 3134 8.3 18 261.2
3. Oklahoma............ 13 406 268 9 66.0 3298 8.1 36 253.7
4. Kansas.............. 11 420 234 14 55.7 2425 5.8 19 220.5
5. Colorado............ 13 420 248 18 59.0 2795 6.7 13 215.0
6. Baylor.............. 11 395 235 11 59.5 2342 5.9 17 212.9
7. Missouri............ 11 377 197 11 52.3 2283 6.1 18 207.5
8. Iowa State.......... 12 351 174 8 49.6 2248 6.4 13 187.3
9. Nebraska............ 11 322 156 23 48.4 2056 6.4 17 186.9
10.Kansas State........ 11 314 176 9 56.1 1957 6.2 12 177.9
11.Texas............... 12 275 159 11 57.8 1983 7.2 12 165.2
----------
Besides these stats any longhorn that knows anything about RM would agree that RM is faster, but VY is the better overall runner.
[This message has been edited by tfunk02 (edited 5/21/2005 12:07a).]