That Elko can't see the Gordian knot of logic he's spinning by continuing to play Reed and how that is a condemnation of his qb room ……. is bordering on the pathological at this point.

Agree. Elko has put himself into a real predicament. Theory has it that it could hurt a starters confidence if you pull him. In my opinion, his confidence is already shattered and that may well be partly Elko's fault for not pulling him earlier in the year to take a breather for a few series and reasses.

Gotta feel for our receivers, too. It's difficult to have confidence making a move for a catch when you don't know where the ball is going. Expect more dropped balls because of it.

Whether we are up big or not, the young QB's should have the 2nd half vs The Citadel. If we are up only a score or two, all the more reason to let the young QB's play

What the heck was that very first pass shown?

I wish we could play a QB as bad as Reed.

How would like to be the back up see how all this plays out in front of you?

Knowing good and well half those passes a 100 other D1 QBs are making, and 100 other back ups are making as well.

TDs this year will be like holding penalties in 2024.

Several significant plays hit recievers in the hands. As bad as things were, gimme those catches...some for third down conversions, and we beat missouri. That said, at absolute worst, we will score touchdowns in garbage time.

Not with Reed at the helm

The problem is the situation is so bad that receivers are literally surprised when the ball actually makes it to them. Let alone in stride.

Only partly kidding

JamiesChallengeCard said:

---

The problem is the situation is so bad that receivers are literally surprised when the ball actually makes it to them. Let alone in stride.

Only partly kidding

---

I think you're spot on here. They're so used to Reed missing by a mile that they just go out there to run their route. The team is quitting on him.

On offense?

Bama - maybe 1 TD late when down by 30+
USCe - maybe 1 TD late when down by 20+
UT - 2 TDs and 2 FGs, if D can hold them under 20 we can win this game.
OU - 1 TD to make the score look better but still a solid 17 point loss.
tu - 1 TD early for a ray of hope, then 1 TD late when down by 20+.

Thereby concluding our 4-8 or 5-7 season. Nice job Mike.

What's a TD?

We have not scored a single touchdown in our road games against LSU and Missouri. I think we will break that drought during garbage time in our road game at Alabama. The last time we did not score an offensive touchdown in a home game was in a 17-7 loss to Texas. So, we should score touchdowns in home games against Tennessee and Texas. Even Arkansas scored 2 touchdowns and 1 field goal against Tennessee.

Jarrin Jay said:

---

Bama - maybe 1 TD late when down by 30+
USCe - maybe 1 TD late when down by 20+
UT - 2 TDs and 2 FGs, if D can hold them under 20 we can win this game.
OU - 1 TD to make the score look better but still a solid 17 point loss.
tu - 1 TD early for a ray of hope, then 1 TD late when down by 20+.

Thereby concluding our 4-8 or 5-7 season. Nice job Mike.

---

I agree that our next SEC home game against Tennessee is our most winnable remaining SEC game. I think winning the turnover margin by 2 will help us to win that game. Arkansas hung with Tennessee before falling short 24-17 because they won the turnover margin 3 to 1. So, we will likely finish 4-8 (1-8 SEC) or 5-7 (2-7 SEC) for our worst ever SEC record.

pic.twitter.com/vBvFc1Kgzv

— 𝓐𝓰𝓰𝓲𝓮𝓔𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓼 (@AggieEdits12) October 11, 2026

That's some hilarious cesspool shiat right there.

yes we'll score more TDs...we're bound to get a pick six somehow

agracer said:

---

That first pick was in the WR who should have caught that ball.

I was at the game Saturday and trust me it looked much worse in person. Not only the bad throws, but the wide open guys he just didn't see.

Every MU fan was pretty universal in saying thanks for having a bad QB because it helped them win where they did not play well compared to last week.

---

Bull ****, he threw it behind the receiver. A good QB puts that out front, where only his guy can catch it.

I genuinely don't think so, unless we really, REALLY commit to the run. Like Georgia Tech of past years.

BillysCesspoolMaintainer said:

---

I wish we could play a QB as bad as Reed.

---

We'd still lose.

Principal Uncertainty said:

---

pic.twitter.com/vBvFc1Kgzv

— 𝓐𝓰𝓰𝓲𝓮𝓔𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓼 (@AggieEdits12) October 11, 2026

That's some hilarious cesspool shiat right there.

---

That first pass is atrocious. I mean that's gotta be intentional.

The rest of those put the ass in passes. Anybody with depth perception should be able to make those throws. The vast majority of them are not even close.

The Banned said:

---

I genuinely don't think so, unless we really, REALLY commit to the run. Like Georgia Tech of past years.

---

We could always commit to the punt like Tech v. Centenary in '39.

Better question - Will our defense / special teams score more TDs than our offense against SEC opponents?

JST92 said:

---

Several significant plays hit recievers in the hands. As bad as things were, gimme those catches...some for third down conversions, and we beat missouri. That said, at absolute worst, we will score touchdowns in garbage time.

---

The one INT that bounced off the receiver (2nd INT) was 100% the WR fault, and one time Craver tried to one-hand a crossing route and it was right there to catch and 1st down +++ yards in the 4th (20-6 at that point) if he puts out two hands to catch it (and it was there to be caught with 2-hands). Even if A&M scores a TD there, they still need another one and MU's offense was finally starting to click at that point and take over with their running game.

Other than those two, it was a pretty pathetic performance.

Yes.