Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Correct me if I'm wrong here….

769 Views | 9 Replies | Last: 14 hrs ago by TyperWoods
biglebowski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But the OL did a MUCH better job opening holes for our back to run through. We did a MUCH better job of getting Craver the ball.

Had you told this to be before the game, I would have thought it was an easy win..
Gig’em
Off_The_Wood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saw on twitter we only allowed 2 TFL and no sacks. Also ran for more than 5 ypc.

OL was definitely better, but it was hard to notice with how awful we were in every other phase of the game.
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We started the game running the ball effectively. Then we decided to go pass happy. This is the first question I'd ask Elmo in the presser. Why did we do that? It made literally no sense.
pointer74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I noticed several times where the hole was there, I mean big time there, and our RBs took the wrong lane and had to bounce back
Seemed that was 80% of the problems with this team, mental errors
npc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OL was fine. Edwards and Owens combined for 102 yards on 23 carries. That's not world beating but remember, there were no explosive plays, so the yardage was consistent; Edwards average 5.6 and only had 5 of the carries; and once again, Owens left a TON of yardage on the field due to stumbles and bumbles, zero cutback ability, and slow so so slow.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
biglebowski said:

But the OL did a MUCH better job opening holes for our back to run through. We did a MUCH better job of getting Craver the ball.

Had you told this to be before the game, I would have thought it was an easy win..


OL was better but Reed was the worst he's been since a starter.

then add in the fact that was our worst defensive showing in a very long time.
World's worst proofreader
Bill Superman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Crazy how our weakest link got stronger yesterday while every other position group regressed immensely.
mustang1234
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Busseys loss will be huge. Versitle weapon. I dont think we have anybody that can fill his shoes at this point.
Divining Rod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
npc said:

...Owens left a TON of yardage on the field due to stumbles and bumbles, zero cutback ability, and slow so so slow.


other than that, Mrs. Lincoln. how did you enjoy the play?
TyperWoods
How long do you want to ignore this user?
npc said:

OL was fine. Edwards and Owens combined for 102 yards on 23 carries. That's not world beating but remember, there were no explosive plays, so the yardage was consistent; Edwards average 5.6 and only had 5 of the carries; and once again, Owens left a TON of yardage on the field due to stumbles and bumbles, zero cutback ability, and slow so so slow.


Edwards got injured, but look good before then. Owens looked much better. When you get down 21, you don't run as much.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.