Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

The promotion of OC and DC from within

8,852 Views | 90 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by 12thMan9
CrottyKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will turn out to be the worst decision Elko ever made. It will be his demise if he doesn't fix it.
SteveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i got roasted for this last week. let's see where the elko lovers are today… ha
oneeyedag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elko still calling plays

Now the OC, is just awful!
agwrestler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KSU Fd us by hiring Klein allowing Elko to not have to do something drastic.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oneeyedag said:

Elko still calling plays

Now the OC, is just awful!


Or we don't have the players on O to capitalize
SteveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
klein didn't exactly light the world on fire.
CrottyKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elko should have hired a stud OC from a top school who at least has called plays before.
Bacardi Rambo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SteveA said:

klein didn't exactly light the world on fire.


He did last year until Momma called 3 days before the whorn game and we turned into a trainwreck
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Extending coaches prematurely is worse.
Captain Winky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He seems to be doing a good job after two games. Why do miserable facks like you even bother watching games?
SteveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
did we break 250 yards?
brunsie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CrottyKid said:

will turn out to be the worst decision Elko ever made. It will be his demise if he doesn't fix it.


We scored 48 points, and the defense forced four turnovers.

This post may have not aged very well.
Dolemite
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SteveA said:

did we break 250 yards?


Do you think having short field possessions and defensive touchdowns had an impact on cumulative yardage?
SteveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
for sure, but when that didn't happen, we were mostly anemic. hopefully you are right and it was just field position.
Captain Winky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can't use big words when talking to an idiot like Steve.
Captain Winky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, you idiot.
SteveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
you seem nice. sorry, we can't talk about lack of offensive production on the football board. sheesh.
3rd Coast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lot of dumbassery in TA. There are so many experts on here, it's shocking that we have been mediocre for most of the last 9 decades
Oldfart2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
brunsie said:

CrottyKid said:

will turn out to be the worst decision Elko ever made. It will be his demise if he doesn't fix it.


We scored 48 points, and the defense forced four turnovers.

This post may have not aged very well.


Not even sure it was birthed very well.
pointer74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The coordinators aren't the problem
It's the over paid players starting with the QB and OL
Great2BeAnAGGIE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our Oline was bad.
Our running plays are to slow developing.
Our QB has some accuracy issues.
Secondary looked confused and out of position on a lot of plays.
Defense did not seal the edges in the first half.

So lots of stuff to work on but all you have to do is win!
OrygunAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To my eye there are still fundamental issues with the Offense rn. Defense didnt have a good game either. I dont think the oc olay calling was bad but there needs to be some upskilling ASAP before we get to lsu. That game could be bad.
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oldfart2 said:

brunsie said:

CrottyKid said:

will turn out to be the worst decision Elko ever made. It will be his demise if he doesn't fix it.


We scored 48 points, and the defense forced four turnovers.

This post may have not aged very well.


Not even sure it was birthed very well.
No one said there was going to be biology on the midterm
TyperWoods
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The correct answer is it's too early to tell.

Offense didn't look very good, but did put up 34pts, or 27 if you don't count the one after muffed punt.

The defense didn't look very good, but did hold what we have been told is a dynamic offense to 20, and the defense itself scored 14.

Best thing is, we won the game convincingly, had only one penalty and it was a BS call, have plenty to work on, and the young RBs looked good on the very few carries they got in garbage time. Also, no major injuries.
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SteveA said:

for sure, but when that didn't happen, we were mostly anemic. hopefully you are right and it was just field position.

I agree with you though. We can't count the rash of turnovers in every game. Our offense needs a lot of work starting with the O-line. The only back to have over 4 ypc was Edwards on 3 carries. That's not going to get it done.
13B
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TyperWoods said:

The correct answer is it's too early to tell.

Offense didn't look very good, but did put up 34pts, or 27 if you don't count the one after muffed punt.

The defense didn't look very good, but did hold what we have been told is a dynamic offense to 20, and the defense itself scored 14.

Best thing is, we won the game convincingly, had only one penalty and it was a BS call, have plenty to work on, and the young RBs looked good on the very few carries they got in garbage time. Also, no major injuries.

I know this is nitpicky but we actually had two. Defensively, we lined up in the neutral zone (which I really didn't think we were) and false start on offense in response to them entering the neutral zone and us reacting. That being said, your point is well taken, two penalties that were questionable is pretty dang good compared to past years.

Edit: The defensive offside was declined so I guess that's why it is not recognized (makes sense I guess, it was supposedly committed and called but since it was declined and not penalized then it doesn't count).
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SteveA said:

i got roasted for this last week. let's see where the elko lovers are today… ha

Heya! Anything to say now?
SteveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Heya! Anything to say now?

Not with 250 yards of offense.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
SteveA said:

Quote:

Heya! Anything to say now?

Not with 250 yards of offense.
almost all in the second half with limited series.

again tell of two halves but need to see more of we want to go far
World's worst proofreader
Mat Lanticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vander54 said:

SteveA said:

Quote:

Heya! Anything to say now?

Not with 250 yards of offense.
almost all in the second half with limited series.

again tell of two halves but need to see more of we want to go far
it's ok to knock back a few beers or whatever and not defend the obvious concerns that others have with Aggie football, you know.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
where's the defense? I literally said we need to see .ore
World's worst proofreader
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldfart2 said:

brunsie said:

CrottyKid said:

will turn out to be the worst decision Elko ever made. It will be his demise if he doesn't fix it.


We scored 48 points, and the defense forced four turnovers.

This post may have not aged very well.


Not even sure it was birthed very well.

Should have been aborted before hitting "Post."
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
A. G. Pennypacker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
brunsie said:

CrottyKid said:

will turn out to be the worst decision Elko ever made. It will be his demise if he doesn't fix it.


We scored 48 points, and the defense forced four turnovers.

This post may have not aged very well.


The defense scored 14 of those points and we were handed another 13 pts on turnovers after the muffed punt, failed fake punt and another fumble. Offense had a few good plays but not nearly good enough to beat the better teams we will face this season. Let's hope it gets better quickly.
Skull Session
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Offense is anemic. Can't run the ball. Playcalling is borderline stupid. This offense is going to get slammed against SEC competition. Reed has regressed. Can't hit a receiver on a crossing route on the run.
TMF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Skull Session said:

Offense is anemic. Can't run the ball. Playcalling is borderline stupid. This offense is going to get slammed against SEC competition. Reed has regressed. Can't hit a receiver on a crossing root on the run.


Offense is a problem. Defense had some struggles but some of that is because offense was anemic. OL and QB seems to be biggest concern. I don't think Reed will be drafted and that is a concern. He is not showing progress. I was hoping he would make the next step this year and good for us and good for him. But this mediocre QB play so far will not get better in SEC play. If he can't make the jump this year he will not next year. We are an elite QB away from making noise.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.