SunrayAg said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

ElephantRider said:

---

greg.w.h said:

---

More Tech propaganda…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/college-sports/main-reasons-why-the-sec-needs-to-extend-an-invitation-to-texas-tech/ar-AA29NcOQ?cvid=6a7b72d15d5144959934ce1d83b8beda&ei=13

---

Tech brings nothing to the SEC

---

Summary of reasons for Tech joining SEC

1. NIL expenditure
2. Regional rivalries = huuuge television ratings = increase value (i.e., tceh increases the value of the SEC)
3. The SEC is passionate - tceh is passionate
4. They have basketball, baseball, and T&F too
5. Locks down the Panhandle market

---

You can't be serious.

Tech has nothing to offer. That's why they are in the big left behind conference to start with.

Nil expenditure does not increase their value to a conference.

The sec has plenty of regional rivalries.

We already have LSU fans. We don't need anymore violent *******s.

And as someone who lives in the panhandle, I can guarantee you that our market is statistically insignificant.

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

A&M turned down a neutral-site game against Tech, per this article. That's pretty lame. https://t.co/hyx1kl0gvK

— John Kurtz (@jlkurtz) August 10, 2026

Looks like Tech is running the same play on us they ran on Texas…act like they tried to schedule us in good faith, pretend like we rejected them because we're scared.

Truly pathetic.

---

AGinHI said:

---

SunrayAg said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

ElephantRider said:

---

greg.w.h said:

---

More Tech propaganda…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/college-sports/main-reasons-why-the-sec-needs-to-extend-an-invitation-to-texas-tech/ar-AA29NcOQ?cvid=6a7b72d15d5144959934ce1d83b8beda&ei=13

---

Tech brings nothing to the SEC

---

Summary of reasons for Tech joining SEC

1. NIL expenditure
2. Regional rivalries = huuuge television ratings = increase value (i.e., tceh increases the value of the SEC)
3. The SEC is passionate - tceh is passionate
4. They have basketball, baseball, and T&F too
5. Locks down the Panhandle market

---

You can't be serious.

Tech has nothing to offer. That's why they are in the big left behind conference to start with.

Nil expenditure does not increase their value to a conference.

The sec has plenty of regional rivalries.

We already have LSU fans. We don't need anymore violent *******s.

And as someone who lives in the panhandle, I can guarantee you that our market is statistically insignificant.

---

Hey you and Jimbo4win,

Just making sure that the both of you are aware I'm merely summarizing the stupid article.

---

Blonde Coffee Beans said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

SunrayAg said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

ElephantRider said:

---

greg.w.h said:

---

More Tech propaganda…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/college-sports/main-reasons-why-the-sec-needs-to-extend-an-invitation-to-texas-tech/ar-AA29NcOQ?cvid=6a7b72d15d5144959934ce1d83b8beda&ei=13

---

Tech brings nothing to the SEC

---

Summary of reasons for Tech joining SEC

1. NIL expenditure
2. Regional rivalries = huuuge television ratings = increase value (i.e., tceh increases the value of the SEC)
3. The SEC is passionate - tceh is passionate
4. They have basketball, baseball, and T&F too
5. Locks down the Panhandle market

---

You can't be serious.

Tech has nothing to offer. That's why they are in the big left behind conference to start with.

Nil expenditure does not increase their value to a conference.

The sec has plenty of regional rivalries.

We already have LSU fans. We don't need anymore violent *******s.

And as someone who lives in the panhandle, I can guarantee you that our market is statistically insignificant.

---

Hey you and Jimbo4win,

Just making sure that the both of you are aware I'm merely summarizing the stupid article.

---

Who's the person you hold so dear to your heart that has an education from tceh?

---

AGinHI said:

---

SunrayAg said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

ElephantRider said:

---

greg.w.h said:

---

More Tech propaganda…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/college-sports/main-reasons-why-the-sec-needs-to-extend-an-invitation-to-texas-tech/ar-AA29NcOQ?cvid=6a7b72d15d5144959934ce1d83b8beda&ei=13

---

Tech brings nothing to the SEC

---

Summary of reasons for Tech joining SEC

1. NIL expenditure
2. Regional rivalries = huuuge television ratings = increase value (i.e., tceh increases the value of the SEC)
3. The SEC is passionate - tceh is passionate
4. They have basketball, baseball, and T&F too
5. Locks down the Panhandle market

---

You can't be serious.

Tech has nothing to offer. That's why they are in the big left behind conference to start with.

Nil expenditure does not increase their value to a conference.

The sec has plenty of regional rivalries.

We already have LSU fans. We don't need anymore violent *******s.

And as someone who lives in the panhandle, I can guarantee you that our market is statistically insignificant.

---

Hey you and Jimbo4win,

Just making sure that the both of you are aware I'm merely summarizing the stupid article.

---

SunrayAg said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

SunrayAg said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

ElephantRider said:

---

greg.w.h said:

---

More Tech propaganda…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/college-sports/main-reasons-why-the-sec-needs-to-extend-an-invitation-to-texas-tech/ar-AA29NcOQ?cvid=6a7b72d15d5144959934ce1d83b8beda&ei=13

---

Tech brings nothing to the SEC

---

Summary of reasons for Tech joining SEC

1. NIL expenditure
2. Regional rivalries = huuuge television ratings = increase value (i.e., tceh increases the value of the SEC)
3. The SEC is passionate - tceh is passionate
4. They have basketball, baseball, and T&F too
5. Locks down the Panhandle market

---

You can't be serious.

Tech has nothing to offer. That's why they are in the big left behind conference to start with.

Nil expenditure does not increase their value to a conference.

The sec has plenty of regional rivalries.

We already have LSU fans. We don't need anymore violent *******s.

And as someone who lives in the panhandle, I can guarantee you that our market is statistically insignificant.

---

Hey you and Jimbo4win,

Just making sure that the both of you are aware I'm merely summarizing the stupid article.

---

Sorry for the confusion. Your post sounded like you were advocating for them. My bad.

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

12thMan9 said:

---

https://fbschedules.com/2027-texas-am-football-schedule/

So, who do you whining vaginas want to play instead?

I have never understood, and never will, why we would want to shy away from competition. Personally, we should play 11 to 12 games against the best. Why so many of y'all want to be ******* is beyond me. Wouldnt a schedule full of good teams make our resume better?

We have one of the weakest fan bases IMO when it comes to playing competitive opponents.

---

1) We are playing 10 P4 games in 2027 already. Adding one more does nothing for us

2) wether you like it or not, the committee doesn't reward playing a 12 game schedule of nothing but night games at Georgia. It rewards minimizing losses at all costs no matter who your wins were against. They will not reward 3 losses even if they're to #1, #2 and #3 all on the road.

---

kyledr04 said:

---

Neutral site games suck. Maybe you'd do a pair of games but there's not a lot of upside for A&M.

---

12thMan9 said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

12thMan9 said:

---

https://fbschedules.com/2027-texas-am-football-schedule/

So, who do you whining vaginas want to play instead?

I have never understood, and never will, why we would want to shy away from competition. Personally, we should play 11 to 12 games against the best. Why so many of y'all want to be ******* is beyond me. Wouldnt a schedule full of good teams make our resume better?

We have one of the weakest fan bases IMO when it comes to playing competitive opponents.

---

1) We are playing 10 P4 games in 2027 already. Adding one more does nothing for us

2) wether you like it or not, the committee doesn't reward playing a 12 game schedule of nothing but night games at Georgia. It rewards minimizing losses at all costs no matter who your wins were against. They will not reward 3 losses even if they're to #1, #2 and #3 all on the road.

---

So, if we played 12 night games at Georgia & won them all, we wouldn't be rewarded?

Maybe you can expand on that logic.....

---

FarmerJohn said:

---

President Trump has declined my offer to meet on Air Force 1. It's clear that he's afraid of my ideas.

---

greg.w.h said:

---

More Tech propaganda…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/college-sports/main-reasons-why-the-sec-needs-to-extend-an-invitation-to-texas-tech/ar-AA29NcOQ?cvid=6a7b72d15d5144959934ce1d83b8beda&ei=13

---

NoahAg said:

---

With 9 SEC games there is no benefit to playing a non-conference opponent that has a decent chance to beat you. The 3 non-conference games need to have a win chance of +75%.

---

12thMan9 said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

12thMan9 said:

---

https://fbschedules.com/2027-texas-am-football-schedule/

So, who do you whining vaginas want to play instead?

I have never understood, and never will, why we would want to shy away from competition. Personally, we should play 11 to 12 games against the best. Why so many of y'all want to be ******* is beyond me. Wouldnt a schedule full of good teams make our resume better?

We have one of the weakest fan bases IMO when it comes to playing competitive opponents.

---

1) We are playing 10 P4 games in 2027 already. Adding one more does nothing for us

2) wether you like it or not, the committee doesn't reward playing a 12 game schedule of nothing but night games at Georgia. It rewards minimizing losses at all costs no matter who your wins were against. They will not reward 3 losses even if they're to #1, #2 and #3 all on the road.

---

So, if we played 12 night games at Georgia & won them all, we wouldn't be rewarded?

Maybe you can expand on that logic.....

---

Aginnebraska said:

---

12thMan9 said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

12thMan9 said:

---

https://fbschedules.com/2027-texas-am-football-schedule/

So, who do you whining vaginas want to play instead?

I have never understood, and never will, why we would want to shy away from competition. Personally, we should play 11 to 12 games against the best. Why so many of y'all want to be ******* is beyond me. Wouldnt a schedule full of good teams make our resume better?

We have one of the weakest fan bases IMO when it comes to playing competitive opponents.

---

1) We are playing 10 P4 games in 2027 already. Adding one more does nothing for us

2) wether you like it or not, the committee doesn't reward playing a 12 game schedule of nothing but night games at Georgia. It rewards minimizing losses at all costs no matter who your wins were against. They will not reward 3 losses even if they're to #1, #2 and #3 all on the road.

---

So, if we played 12 night games at Georgia & won them all, we wouldn't be rewarded?

Maybe you can expand on that logic.....

---

You would be rewarded with a slot in the playoffs...the same playoffs and likely the same slot in the playoffs you would be awarded if you went played 12 games against generic P2 opponents. No better. No worse.

---

Signel said:

---

There is literally no up side to playing Tech... They have to understand that, but I think it is more about making a statement to the media.

---

Ihatefallscounty said:

---

Speaking logically,

I thought it was weird we left them behind, also thought it was weird OU left OSU behind. I am a big proponent of rooting for agriculture schools, so to me tech made more sense than bringing Texas in, culturally anyways.

Speaking illogically, they let in texas, let in GA tech, FSU, Clemson, Tech, OSU, and Mcneese state for all i care. Burn it to the ground.

---