Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Texas Tech vs Texas. Week 1. Sep 5th.

11,983 Views | 92 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by DGrimesAg92
rollingwoodaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well tu should keep their mouth shut.
Sumlins Pool Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing stupider than hiring a dozen boomers to count wins and loses
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Skubalon said:

Jimbo4win said:

Texas could play Tech and Sark's argument would still be spot on. Playing one tough game does not make Tech's schedule difficult. Playing 9 SEC games and Ohio State does. Sark is saying EXACTLY what we have been saying since 2012. Tech is the perfect example of what is wrong with the committee. The fact the committee would put a 11-1 Tech ahead of or in place of a 10-2 A&M is the problem Sark is voicing. He's on the money and it's WAY past time for the committee to pay attention.

Tech finished last year ranked #8 and beat four teams that finished in the top 25 by 3+ scores (and had five total top 25 wins - beat BYU twice). Tech finished ahead of A&M in both polls.

Tech has to play the hand it was dealt. Tech's schedule this year is embarrassingly easy… no question. Part of that is because no one wants to schedule a home and home with Tech. I don't blame them.

I personally hate the Big 12. I hope Tech eventually gets a shot at the Big 10 before the whole thing falls apart. I think Tech is starting to push for that but has work to do.

As for Sark - if he's *****ing about Tech getting into the CFP and the whorns didn't, here's the solution: get good and don't lose to Florida. Problem solved. Tech isn't UT's problem. UT is UT's problem. Sark's panties got dropped to his ankles by Cody Campbell and I think it's hilarious. Sark needs to drink less or drink more, but what he's currently doing isn't working.

Who cares. BYU was not the 11th best team last year. Utah was not the 14th best team. UH was not the 22nd best team. We need to stop taking Big 12 teams seriously when their strongest wins are over the likes of Cincinnati. Missouri is likely better than those three teams. Tech finished ranked ahead of us, but do you honestly believe they were better than us?
Jimbo4win
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

Skubalon said:

Jimbo4win said:

Texas could play Tech and Sark's argument would still be spot on. Playing one tough game does not make Tech's schedule difficult. Playing 9 SEC games and Ohio State does. Sark is saying EXACTLY what we have been saying since 2012. Tech is the perfect example of what is wrong with the committee. The fact the committee would put a 11-1 Tech ahead of or in place of a 10-2 A&M is the problem Sark is voicing. He's on the money and it's WAY past time for the committee to pay attention.

Tech finished last year ranked #8 and beat four teams that finished in the top 25 by 3+ scores (and had five total top 25 wins - beat BYU twice). Tech finished ahead of A&M in both polls.

Tech has to play the hand it was dealt. Tech's schedule this year is embarrassingly easy… no question. Part of that is because no one wants to schedule a home and home with Tech. I don't blame them.

I personally hate the Big 12. I hope Tech eventually gets a shot at the Big 10 before the whole thing falls apart. I think Tech is starting to push for that but has work to do.

As for Sark - if he's *****ing about Tech getting into the CFP and the whorns didn't, here's the solution: get good and don't lose to Florida. Problem solved. Tech isn't UT's problem. UT is UT's problem. Sark's panties got dropped to his ankles by Cody Campbell and I think it's hilarious. Sark needs to drink less or drink more, but what he's currently doing isn't working.

Who cares. BYU was not the 11th best team last year. Utah was not the 14th best team. UH was not the 22nd best team. We need to stop taking Big 12 teams seriously when their strongest wins are over the likes of Cincinnati. Missouri is likely better than those three teams. Tech finished ranked ahead of us, but do you honestly believe they were better than us?


This-and I wasn't referencing last year. We finished 11-1 last year, not 10-2. I was using a hypothetical for this upcoming year. A body of work of 10-2 or hell, even 9-3 with our upcoming schedule is far superior to Tech going 12-0 with their upcoming schedule but the committee doesn't get it. Honest question, how many wins would Tech have with our schedule? The committee doesn't care about anything but the win total and that was Sark's point.
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiedad7 said:

rgag12 said:

JohnnyShotgun said:

Tech with no qb headed into the season loses this by 28 before Sark calls off the dogs. I guess tech is just happy having people talk about them and not their gambling addicted qb.


Tech knows tu will never say yes, even if they know they'll win the game. That's the point.

They want tu to say no to forever have this over them.

there's nothing to "have". Do you really think the sips give a crap about Tech? They have OSU with Game Day week 2. After Tech's goose egg against Oregon nobody cares about them. They'll play 12 HS teams and crow but nobody will be listening. Sure as winners of the BDF they'll get into the CFP and get drilled again. Iron sharpens iron. Playing cream puffs every week doesn't prepare a team for the playoffs.

Sark shouldn't go around shooting his mouth off then if tu doesn't give a crap about tceh, sounds like schedule envy on tu's part.
Hank the Grifter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hate the sips with the fire of a thousand suns but this new money Napoleon complex version of Tech that's popped up over the last couple of years has made them even more obnoxious and crude, and I didn't think that was even possible.

These guys never sniffed a conference championship in the Big XII until all the big daddies left for greener pastures. Now that they're the tallest midget, they strut around shooting their mouths off.
I'd love to see t.u. accept this challenge and absolutely embarrass the sand fleas.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hank the Grifter said:

I hate the sips with the fire of a thousand suns but this new money Napoleon complex version of Tech that's popped up over the last couple of years has made them even more obnoxious and crude, and I didn't think that was even possible.

These guys never sniffed a conference championship in the Big XII until all the big daddies left for greener pastures. Now that they're the tallest midget, they strut around shooting their mouths off.
I'd love to see t.u. accept this challenge and absolutely embarrass the sand fleas.
I'd love to see Texas lose to them 77-0
WorkTogetherAgs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Steve Sarkisian definitely ran his mouth, but he is probably right that Texas has a much tougher schedule with 9 SEC games and Ohio State than Texas Tech has with 9 Big 12 games and Oregon State. The Texas Tech vs Texas game in week 1 is highly unlikely to happen this year.
LB12MEEN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This whole thing is a pillow Fight. Both teams know the other won't play them so it's all a bunch of blah blah blah.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LB12MEEN said:

This whole thing is a pillow Fight. Both teams know the other won't play them so it's all a bunch of blah blah blah.

Yeah its pretty dumb. Tceh look absolutely ridiculous for all the posturing
12mn95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
its all posturing on Techs behalf because they know this game will never happen. Also, people forget that these dates7games are already assigned to networks..i think, and I may be wrong, Texas vs their cupcake is on Fox Sports1 or something like that. A game vs Tech would be on ESPN...no way Fox or some other network gives up that game...
AozorAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rab79 said:

aggiedad7 said:

rgag12 said:

JohnnyShotgun said:

Tech with no qb headed into the season loses this by 28 before Sark calls off the dogs. I guess tech is just happy having people talk about them and not their gambling addicted qb.


Tech knows tu will never say yes, even if they know they'll win the game. That's the point.

They want tu to say no to forever have this over them.

there's nothing to "have". Do you really think the sips give a crap about Tech? They have OSU with Game Day week 2. After Tech's goose egg against Oregon nobody cares about them. They'll play 12 HS teams and crow but nobody will be listening. Sure as winners of the BDF they'll get into the CFP and get drilled again. Iron sharpens iron. Playing cream puffs every week doesn't prepare a team for the playoffs.

Sark shouldn't go around shooting his mouth off then if tu doesn't give a crap about tceh, sounds like schedule envy on tu's part.

Sark is correct that Tceh played a horrendously bad schedule last year and will again this year. That's factual.

Just because Sark stated fact about their garbage schedule doesn't mean he now has to add them to his schedule, and he shouldn't.
southernswag363
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AozorAg said:

rab79 said:

aggiedad7 said:

rgag12 said:

JohnnyShotgun said:

Tech with no qb headed into the season loses this by 28 before Sark calls off the dogs. I guess tech is just happy having people talk about them and not their gambling addicted qb.


Tech knows tu will never say yes, even if they know they'll win the game. That's the point.

They want tu to say no to forever have this over them.

there's nothing to "have". Do you really think the sips give a crap about Tech? They have OSU with Game Day week 2. After Tech's goose egg against Oregon nobody cares about them. They'll play 12 HS teams and crow but nobody will be listening. Sure as winners of the BDF they'll get into the CFP and get drilled again. Iron sharpens iron. Playing cream puffs every week doesn't prepare a team for the playoffs.

Sark shouldn't go around shooting his mouth off then if tu doesn't give a crap about tceh, sounds like schedule envy on tu's part.

Sark is correct that Tceh played a horrendously bad schedule last year and will again this year. That's factual.

Just because Sark stated fact about their garbage schedule doesn't mean he now has to add them to his schedule, and he shouldn't.


sark also failed to mention he already was in the big 12 for 3 years with tu and went 17-10 in conference play in that time. Why didn't he go undefeated when he was in the big 12 with his great and powerful texas team?
AozorAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southernswag363 said:

AozorAg said:

rab79 said:

aggiedad7 said:

rgag12 said:

JohnnyShotgun said:

Tech with no qb headed into the season loses this by 28 before Sark calls off the dogs. I guess tech is just happy having people talk about them and not their gambling addicted qb.


Tech knows tu will never say yes, even if they know they'll win the game. That's the point.

They want tu to say no to forever have this over them.

there's nothing to "have". Do you really think the sips give a crap about Tech? They have OSU with Game Day week 2. After Tech's goose egg against Oregon nobody cares about them. They'll play 12 HS teams and crow but nobody will be listening. Sure as winners of the BDF they'll get into the CFP and get drilled again. Iron sharpens iron. Playing cream puffs every week doesn't prepare a team for the playoffs.

Sark shouldn't go around shooting his mouth off then if tu doesn't give a crap about tceh, sounds like schedule envy on tu's part.

Sark is correct that Tceh played a horrendously bad schedule last year and will again this year. That's factual.

Just because Sark stated fact about their garbage schedule doesn't mean he now has to add them to his schedule, and he shouldn't.


sark also failed to mention he already was in the big 12 for 3 years with tu and went 17-10 in conference play in that time. Why didn't he go undefeated when he was in the big 12 with his great and powerful texas team?


That doesn't have anything to do with this thread or what I said. You should probably start a new thread about that.
Citizen Reign
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AozorAg said:

southernswag363 said:

AozorAg said:

rab79 said:

aggiedad7 said:

rgag12 said:

JohnnyShotgun said:

Tech with no qb headed into the season loses this by 28 before Sark calls off the dogs. I guess tech is just happy having people talk about them and not their gambling addicted qb.


Tech knows tu will never say yes, even if they know they'll win the game. That's the point.

They want tu to say no to forever have this over them.

there's nothing to "have". Do you really think the sips give a crap about Tech? They have OSU with Game Day week 2. After Tech's goose egg against Oregon nobody cares about them. They'll play 12 HS teams and crow but nobody will be listening. Sure as winners of the BDF they'll get into the CFP and get drilled again. Iron sharpens iron. Playing cream puffs every week doesn't prepare a team for the playoffs.

Sark shouldn't go around shooting his mouth off then if tu doesn't give a crap about tceh, sounds like schedule envy on tu's part.

Sark is correct that Tceh played a horrendously bad schedule last year and will again this year. That's factual.

Just because Sark stated fact about their garbage schedule doesn't mean he now has to add them to his schedule, and he shouldn't.


sark also failed to mention he already was in the big 12 for 3 years with tu and went 17-10 in conference play in that time. Why didn't he go undefeated when he was in the big 12 with his great and powerful texas team?


That doesn't have anything to do with this thread or what I said. You should probably start a new thread about that.

Seems like it fits nicely in this thread. I agree with your point and the 17-10 comment. However, the only real mistake Sark made is bringing attention to Tceh. Let Cody beg for attention and give tceh none.
LB12MEEN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AozorAg said:

rab79 said:

aggiedad7 said:

rgag12 said:

JohnnyShotgun said:

Tech with no qb headed into the season loses this by 28 before Sark calls off the dogs. I guess tech is just happy having people talk about them and not their gambling addicted qb.


Tech knows tu will never say yes, even if they know they'll win the game. That's the point.

They want tu to say no to forever have this over them.

there's nothing to "have". Do you really think the sips give a crap about Tech? They have OSU with Game Day week 2. After Tech's goose egg against Oregon nobody cares about them. They'll play 12 HS teams and crow but nobody will be listening. Sure as winners of the BDF they'll get into the CFP and get drilled again. Iron sharpens iron. Playing cream puffs every week doesn't prepare a team for the playoffs.

Sark shouldn't go around shooting his mouth off then if tu doesn't give a crap about tceh, sounds like schedule envy on tu's part.

Sark is correct that Tceh played a horrendously bad schedule last year and will again this year. That's factual.

Just because Sark stated fact about their garbage schedule doesn't mean he now has to add them to his schedule, and he shouldn't.

Don't remember Sark stating things such as this when Texas was in the Big 12.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LB12MEEN said:

AozorAg said:

rab79 said:

aggiedad7 said:

rgag12 said:

JohnnyShotgun said:

Tech with no qb headed into the season loses this by 28 before Sark calls off the dogs. I guess tech is just happy having people talk about them and not their gambling addicted qb.


Tech knows tu will never say yes, even if they know they'll win the game. That's the point.

They want tu to say no to forever have this over them.

there's nothing to "have". Do you really think the sips give a crap about Tech? They have OSU with Game Day week 2. After Tech's goose egg against Oregon nobody cares about them. They'll play 12 HS teams and crow but nobody will be listening. Sure as winners of the BDF they'll get into the CFP and get drilled again. Iron sharpens iron. Playing cream puffs every week doesn't prepare a team for the playoffs.

Sark shouldn't go around shooting his mouth off then if tu doesn't give a crap about tceh, sounds like schedule envy on tu's part.

Sark is correct that Tceh played a horrendously bad schedule last year and will again this year. That's factual.

Just because Sark stated fact about their garbage schedule doesn't mean he now has to add them to his schedule, and he shouldn't.

Don't remember Sark stating things such as this when Texas was in the Big 12.

That was ages ago in ... 2023
Jimbo4win
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rab79 said:

aggiedad7 said:

rgag12 said:

JohnnyShotgun said:

Tech with no qb headed into the season loses this by 28 before Sark calls off the dogs. I guess tech is just happy having people talk about them and not their gambling addicted qb.


Tech knows tu will never say yes, even if they know they'll win the game. That's the point.

They want tu to say no to forever have this over them.

there's nothing to "have". Do you really think the sips give a crap about Tech? They have OSU with Game Day week 2. After Tech's goose egg against Oregon nobody cares about them. They'll play 12 HS teams and crow but nobody will be listening. Sure as winners of the BDF they'll get into the CFP and get drilled again. Iron sharpens iron. Playing cream puffs every week doesn't prepare a team for the playoffs.

Sark shouldn't go around shooting his mouth off then if tu doesn't give a crap about tceh, sounds like schedule envy on tu's part.


He didn't. He sent a valid message to the committee and Tech as exhibit A-all valid
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm gonna try not to throw up while typing this.

I agree with sip.

Tard can do all the "I'm a chicken hawk and you're a chicken" posturing they want to. But the simple fact is, Sorsby or no Sorsby, sip would shove their dildos in tard's bums about a foot deep.

BYU as a measuring stick? Child please. I watched BYU 3 times last year. North Shore and Duncanville looked more formidable. And I'm not exaggerating.
MidlandOil$
How long do you want to ignore this user?
classof92 said:

This is embarrassing for Texas Tech. It's a publicity stunt designed to generate attention than a serious proposal. They're desperate for attention

The whole thing comes across as an attempt to create headlines and stir up excitement rather than a realistic discussion. If I were a Tech fan, I'd be cringing at this.


TT fans are unsusceptible to embarrassment or anything cringeworthy
classof92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think TT is trying to avoid playing Abilene Christian. TT needed overtime to beat them in 2024 (52-51). Newfound money rednecks trying to have a seat at the table.
DGrimesAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SteveA said:

Quote:

Not to back Texas, but this is ridiculous from Tech. They know schedules aren't going to be changed this quickly and their schedule is complete trash. Texas is playing 9 SEC games and OSU. Tech is playing the bottom of the Big12 and OSU(Oregon state)

It's not ridiculous at all. Sark called them out for having weak schedule, and Tech is putting its money where its mouth is. Yes, it's very unlikely, but it puts the onus back on tu to answer for the crap they have been talking.


Are they wrong though??
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.