Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Who do we lose to portal?

27,270 Views | 129 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by npc
Tamuco99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Justice Beaver said:

1876er said:

Justice Beaver said:

1876er said:

At some point you have to stop the revolving door of QBs. This team is undefeated with Haynes King this year, but we gave up on him for the "better" Conner Weigman, who we also gave up on for the "better" Marcel Reed. Now y'all want to give up on Reed for the next "better" qb. Very few portal QBs are very good.

Absolutely ludicrous take. There is no way you actually believe this…King is still a walking turnover and a subpar passer.


He threw 5 ints all year. Thats fewer than Mendoza and Sayin.

He completed >70% of his passes. Has A&M ever had a QB do that?

He also ran for almost 1000 yards.


He also lost them critical games down the stretch with backbreaking turnovers…You know that neither you, I, or any other Ag owe him anything for being on the roster here for a cup of coffee, right? The kid just isn't good. It's ok to say it.
I've given up trying to explain this to people who don't bother actually watching games
Batty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Him and Kennedy were both pretty far down the depth chart. Probably wouldn't see much time at all next season either. Need to improve our talent across the board. Good luck to them.
aeon-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaxPower said:

I wouldn't say Reed is irreplaceable. He's a good, not great QB who seemed to hit a wall a bit here midseason. Not saying I want him to leave but it wouldn't be losing someone transcendent like Johnny or Von.

No one is irreplaceable!
aeon-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Artorias said:

Reed is good enough to dominate weaker defenses like the B12.

He'd be a star in the little 12, but is severely lacking in the SEC. I hope Elko will recruit a quarter back that can compete.
TxAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PeekingDuck said:

Him and Kennedy were both pretty far down the depth chart. Probably wouldn't see much time at all next season either. Need to improve our talent across the board. Good luck to them.


They'll likely go to a place like TxTech and become All Americans
npc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Batty said:


Williams and Kennedy are very explosive for the edge position and it surprises me Elko is letting them out the door with Howell and Hayes gone.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not surprising at all

Kennedy is slightly surprising but again, only slightly.

We plan to attack the portal hard at dl and they knew it
5 4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marco Jones was getting more snaps than both the last month of the season. Elko is very high on Tristen Givens so I expect him to be playing early.
TxAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
npc said:

Batty said:


Williams and Kennedy are very explosive for the edge position and it surprises me Elko is letting them out the door with Howell and Hayes gone.


True.
But entering portal doesn't mean they're 100% gone.
They may just be negotiating
Corn Pop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reed is going to LSU. Kiffen will have Reed win a heisman.
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We'll see on Kennedy. Entering the portal isnt the same as transferring until it is
orag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd hate to see Rylan Kennedy go. There were many times where he did well when he got his chance.
DGrimesAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jamey said:

We'll see on Kennedy. Entering the portal isnt the same as transferring until it is


Yeah, because "apparently" you can jump ship and still allowed to be part of the team even when EVERYONE knows you've checked out.
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
orag80 said:

I'd hate to see Rylan Kennedy go. There were many times where he did well when he got his chance.


Kennedy gets a shot at the NFL on athleticism alone. Id like to see him spend another season at A&M, see what comes of him. Its a rotation position
Dex_Mick_Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jamey said:

orag80 said:

I'd hate to see Rylan Kennedy go. There were many times where he did well when he got his chance.


Kennedy gets a shot at the NFL on athleticism alone. Id like to see him spend another season at A&M, see what comes of him. Its a rotation position


Meh.

JAG, maybe JAG+...
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dex_Mick_Bear said:

jamey said:

orag80 said:

I'd hate to see Rylan Kennedy go. There were many times where he did well when he got his chance.


Kennedy gets a shot at the NFL on athleticism alone. Id like to see him spend another season at A&M, see what comes of him. Its a rotation position


Meh.

JAG, maybe JAG+...


He had 13 tackles as a backup DE, Howell had 31 and Kennedy is arguably the best athlete on the team.

He's worth a shot. He could break out
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If we weren't shooting for higher, we'd have offered him more incentive to stay.

Hes testing the waters because he likely believes when it all shakes out he will be our 4th, 5th, or even 6th de next year
Dad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would be a good thing if he left.

Right now I think we do what A&M does best and reward him for being mediocre with lots of money. Then, next year the schedule is much harder and we are back to being 8 win A&M. We might even slip to 7 since we lose one of our 3 "automatic" wins we buy every year.
jt16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has Elijah Robinson written all over it. Look at our DL when he was here. We had Leal and Clemons playing SDE at 275/280 lbs not DEs at 250/260. Our rush DEs were also considerably heavier than what we've been doing the last couple of seasons.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In general, Elko plays two very different DEs. A 5 tech that has played anywhere from 260(Hayes, Clemons, Searcy) to 290 (leal, Stewart, Turner). He plays a hybrid edge that has played anywhere from 6-4 247 (Johnson), 6-5 270 (Clemons in certain sets), 6-2 250 (Howell), 6-3 255 (Durham), and Scourton 6-4 285,

But most are still going to be 240-260 in that hybrid edge role. We may go bigger at times with a Marco jones at 6-5 265/270 ish. But don't be surprised if our starting hybrid end is a 6-4 255 type and we maybe try to go back to that 275+ 5 tech instead of the smaller 260 guys we play this year. More due to necessity of what we could find in the portal than ideal from elkos scheme

That said Kennedy was 239, so still on the small end. But this isn't really what is happening. He isn't a physical enough presence in the in game like a Durham, or even tyree Johnson who was 6-4 247.
jt16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beerad12man said:

In general, Elko plays two very different DEs. A 5 tech that has played anywhere from 260(Hayes, Clemons, Searcy) to 290 (leal, Stewart, Turner). He plays a hybrid edge that has played anywhere from 6-4 247 (Johnson), 6-5 270 (Clemons in certain sets), 6-2 250 (Howell), 6-3 255 (Durham), and Scourton 6-4 285,

But most are still going to be 240-260 in that hybrid edge role. We may go bigger at times with a Marco jones at 6-5 265/270 ish. But don't be surprised if our starting hybrid end is a 6-4 255 type and we maybe try to go back to that 275+ 5 tech instead of the smaller 260 guys we play this year. More due to necessity of what we could find in the portal than ideal from elkos scheme

That said Kennedy was 239, so still on the small end. But this isn't really what is happening. He isn't a physical enough presence in the in game like a Durham, or even tyree Johnson who was 6-4 247.


I agree with everything you're saying. I said similar thing in the other portal thread. Kennedy is in year 3 and still in the 230s. His a situational guy and not big enough to be an every down type. I think we're trying beef up the DL going forward. I really like Kennedys motor and hope we ultimately keep him. But I'm guessing he might also have been told to add several pounds or risk not seeing the field
Cojack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone
mrfun83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Big Swede just jumped up on the big block.
npc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beerad12man said:

In general, Elko plays two very different DEs. A 5 tech that has played anywhere from 260(Hayes, Clemons, Searcy) to 290 (leal, Stewart, Turner). He plays a hybrid edge that has played anywhere from 6-4 247 (Johnson), 6-5 270 (Clemons in certain sets), 6-2 250 (Howell), 6-3 255 (Durham), and Scourton 6-4 285,

But most are still going to be 240-260 in that hybrid edge role. We may go bigger at times with a Marco jones at 6-5 265/270 ish. But don't be surprised if our starting hybrid end is a 6-4 255 type and we maybe try to go back to that 275+ 5 tech instead of the smaller 260 guys we play this year. More due to necessity of what we could find in the portal than ideal from elkos scheme

That said Kennedy was 239, so still on the small end. But this isn't really what is happening. He isn't a physical enough presence in the in game like a Durham, or even tyree Johnson who was 6-4 247.
Excellent post.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.