Who?mikejones! said:

---

Vandy winning plus ou losing = vandy(or byu or miami) last team in

---

Didn't lose to Florida

OU's offense is terrible and might actually lose this game for them.

This feels like a game where both teams probably should just punt on 1st down because their defense has the best chance of scoring.

MaroonStain said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Vandy winning plus ou losing = vandy(or byu or miami) last team in

---

Didn't lose to Florida

---

Why you quoting me? Texas isnt in the covno for a spot right now

Ag1188 said:

---

does OU's Mateer just suck? How is their offense so bad? That INT was on him. I haven't watched closely enough to know if they're all his fault. It's amazing how big of a dud he turned into. Not remotely scared to play them in the playoffs or next year.

---

Mateer thinks he's Bret Farve with his passes, unfortunately for him, those balls are hanging in the air for the defense to pick off.

See. It's hard to win all your games. Nut up boys.

Onionman said:

---

Wabs said:

---

This! Sips are being left out because they lost to a horrible Florida team. If they hadn't lost that game, they'd be a lock for a playoff spot.

Does anyone here think we would get in with 3 losses? Like ever? Even if we lost to OSU, UGA and Alabama. Hell, we'd be lucky to be in the top 25.

---

I agree with your last paragraph.

But you can't possibly tell me if they schedule Kennesaw St instead of OSU and are 10-2 right now they would be left out!

I don't give a sh*t if it was a brutal loss. They aint keeping 10-2 sip team out. And yes they get favorable treatment.

---

Maybe.

But if Longhorns didn't play Ohio State, they might not have been ready for big games. Might have lost to Oklahoma which was first time they faced defense with a pulse.

Ag1188 said:

---

does OU's Mateer just suck? How is their offense so bad? That INT was on him. I haven't watched closely enough to know if all 3 INTS were his fault. It's amazing how big of a dud he turned into. Not remotely scared to play them in the playoffs or next year.

---

I think he's kind of like Reed - super streaky.

He can definitely win you a game or lose you a game by himself.

Onionman said:

---

MaroonStain said:

---

Onionman said:

---

MaroonStain said:

---

"Texas should get credit for scheduling Ohio State" - 0u lsu announcer

---

I actually agree. They could have scheduled Kennesaw St like IU did and easily won that game and would be in the playoffs.

If you are going to keep them out then every team should just schedule cream puffs for non conf games.

---

Lost to Florida

---

No sh*t,

And Bama lost to a horrible FSU team.

I guarantee you a 10-2 sip team would get in. I don't care if it was a bad loss. They schedule a cream puff instead of OSU they would be in.

---

As bad as Manning was in week 1, they probably lose that cupcake P5 game in your hypothetical.

OU looks like an Iowa team.

Fans need those shirts saying punting is winning.

I would love OU to get in and get them in the first round!

with a win...LSU might move into the committee's top 25...and give the Ags another ranked win

ditto for Missouri

Vandy didn't lose to Florida. Amirite?

Onionman said:

---

Wabs said:

---

This! Sips are being left out because they lost to a horrible Florida team. If they hadn't lost that game, they'd be a lock for a playoff spot.

Does anyone here think we would get in with 3 losses? Like ever? Even if we lost to OSU, UGA and Alabama. Hell, we'd be lucky to be in the top 25.

---

I agree with your last paragraph.

But you can't possibly tell me if they schedule Kennesaw St instead of OSU and are 10-2 right now they would be left out!

I don't give a sh*t if it was a brutal loss. They aint keeping 10-2 sip team out. And yes they get favorable treatment.

---

Is Notre dame a bubble team?

Onionman said:

---

MaroonStain said:

---

"Texas should get credit for scheduling Ohio State" - 0u lsu announcer

---

I actually agree. They could have scheduled Kennesaw St like IU did and easily won that game and would be in the playoffs.

If you are going to keep them out then every team should just schedule cream puffs for non conf games.

---

I have NO problem with them being the highest ranked 3 loss team due to their scheduling.

But they shouldn't get to pretend they're a 2 loss team just because that loss was to tOSU.

If you're going to credit them for a close loss to a great team, you need to discount their nail biter wins (in OT) against MSU & Kentucky.

That game should (and does) put them in great shape vs 3 loss teams, but a loss to OSU is still a loss, despite tu wanting to be treated as if it isn't.

So our win over LSU (at night and on the road) looks better than sips win over OU on a neutral field.

MaroonStain said:

---

Vandy didn't lose to Florida. Amirite?

---

They didn't play, so yes.

Ag1188 said:

---

Onionman said:

---

MaroonStain said:

---

Onionman said:

---

MaroonStain said:

---

"Texas should get credit for scheduling Ohio State" - 0u lsu announcer

---

I actually agree. They could have scheduled Kennesaw St like IU did and easily won that game and would be in the playoffs.

If you are going to keep them out then every team should just schedule cream puffs for non conf games.

---

Lost to Florida

---

No sh*t,

And Bama lost to a horrible FSU team.

I guarantee you a 10-2 sip team would get in. I don't care if it was a bad loss. They schedule a cream puff instead of OSU they would be in.

---

As bad as Manning was in week 1, they probably lose that cupcake P5 game in your hypothetical.

---

Really? Only team to play OSU within 1 score but you think they lose to a cream puff?

birdman said:

---

Onionman said:

---

Wabs said:

---

This! Sips are being left out because they lost to a horrible Florida team. If they hadn't lost that game, they'd be a lock for a playoff spot.

Does anyone here think we would get in with 3 losses? Like ever? Even if we lost to OSU, UGA and Alabama. Hell, we'd be lucky to be in the top 25.

---

I agree with your last paragraph.

But you can't possibly tell me if they schedule Kennesaw St instead of OSU and are 10-2 right now they would be left out!

I don't give a sh*t if it was a brutal loss. They aint keeping 10-2 sip team out. And yes they get favorable treatment.

---

Maybe.

But if Longhorns didn't play Ohio State, they might not have been ready for big games. Might have lost to Oklahoma which was first time they faced defense with a pulse.

---

How did loosing at Ohio State prepare tu to lose against Florida?

Wabs said:

---

So our win over LSU (at night and on the road) looks better than sips win over OU on a neutral field.

---

Let's keep it up! We are really twisting up the burnt orange Zoo posters.

So, update if this score holds

Osu
Iu
Uga
Tech

Oregon
Ole miss
Tamu
Notre dame?

vandy/byu/bama/miami
Acc champ
Go5 champ

JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:

---

Onionman said:

---

MaroonStain said:

---

"Texas should get credit for scheduling Ohio State" - 0u lsu announcer

---

I actually agree. They could have scheduled Kennesaw St like IU did and easily won that game and would be in the playoffs.

If you are going to keep them out then every team should just schedule cream puffs for non conf games.

---

I have NO problem with them being the highest ranked 3 loss team due to their scheduling.

But they shouldn't get to pretend they're a 2 loss team just because that loss was to tOSU.

If you're going to credit them for a close loss to a great team, you need to discount their nail biter wins (in OT) against MSU & Kentucky.

That game should (and does) put them in great shape vs 3 loss teams, but a loss to OSU is still a loss, despite tu wanting to be treated as if it isn't.

---

I can agree with this.

But why even schedule an OSU going forward? System set up doesn't penalize IU for their terrible non conf schedule. So they made a mistake by scheduling OSU, IMO.

What 2 loss team will tu jump over?

Onionman said:

---

OU looks like an Iowa team.

Fans need those shirts saying punting is winning.

---

OU is extremely lucky they beat Tennessee and Bama. They're also a bit lucky they beat Missouri, Pribula was incredibly inaccurate that game

wins by LSU and Missouri also provide a boost for Vandy

Vandy's victory resume might be better than Notre Dame's in about an hour

stay tuned

They said they'd reward such scheduling but then didn't really

Vandy pulling away

Sooners are gonna **** up and give sips onr of their outs.

MaroonStain said:

---

Wabs said:

---

So our win over LSU (at night and on the road) looks better than sips win over OU on a neutral field.

---

Let's keep it up! We are really twisting up the burnt orange Zoo posters.

---

I hate sips with a passion so if you think bringing up a debate on scheduling is being an orange lover you are sadly mistaken. And yes I did graduate from A&M.

Feel free to say loss to Fl again since that is all you can add to a conversation.

How is it possible that OU's offense is more feeble than LSU's? This is a painful game to watch.

I don't think sip is going to jump Miami, so if OU loses and drops out I think they put Miami in at large to shut up the ND/Miami controversy.

Yep, and vandy if they finish off ut

dabo man said:

---

How is it possible that OU's offense is more feeble than LSU's? This is a painful game to watch.

---

Well they look better than the Ags last night

Wabs said:

---

What 2 loss team will tu jump over?

---

Vandy is the only one I think you could credibly put a 3-loss sips in over. Their schedule is horrible and sips have the H2H.

They aren't jumping 2 loss vandy

C'mon, OU, Vandy.and (holding my nose) Bama.